Paper · 2018 · Revista Caatinga

PRODUCTIVE-ECONOMIC BENEFIT OF FORAGE CACTUS-SORGHUM INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS IRRIGATED WITH SALINE WATER

LUCIVANIA RODRIGUES LIMA; THIERES GEORGE FREIRE DA SILVA; POLIANA DE CALDAS PEREIRA; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
49
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the productive and economic performance of a forage cactus and sorghum intercropping system in relation to a forage cactus single cropping system under different irrigation blades with saline water. The study was conducted in Serra Talhada, State of Pernambuco, in a randomized block design, consisting of a factorial arrangement with split-plot parcels (5×2) and four replications. The five plots were the irrigation depths based on the reference evapotranspiration (ETo) (0, 8.75, 17.5, 26.25, and 35% ETo) and the two cropping systems were single forage cactus cropping and cactus intercropped with sorghum. The experiment was conducted for one year, with one forage cactus cycle and two cycles of sorghum. Yields were obtained at the end of the cycles. Economic profitability was analyzed by means of net revenue (NR) and the benefit/cost ratio (B/C), with cactus forage sold as forage or as "seed" and sorghum as forage. Net revenue and B/C simulations were carried out over an eight-year useful life span of the irrigation system. Increasing irrigation depth increased the dry matter yield of the intercropping system because of higher sorghum yield. Based on the NR and B/C ratio values, forage cactus and sorghum produced as forage produced higher economic outcomes in the intercropping system and showed a higher profitability from the 2nd year of implementation of the irrigation system. Forage cactus and sorghum intercropping irrigated with saline water is therefore recommended for forage production in the Brazilian semi-arid region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater irrigation depth increased intercropping dry matter yield.

Taxon
forage cactust0
Treatment
Increasing irrigation depthe0
Outcome
dry matter yield of the intercropping systeme0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing irrigation depth increased the dry matter yield of the intercropping system because of higher sorghum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE CACTUS-SORGHUM INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater irrigation depth increased sorghum yield.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Increasing irrigation depthe0
Outcome
sorghum yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing irrigation depth increased the dry matter yield of the intercropping system because of higher sorghum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE CACTUS-SORGHUM INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping produced higher economic returns for forage production.

Taxon
forage cactust0
Outcome
economic outcomese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
intercropping systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“forage cactus and sorghum produced as forage produced higher economic outcomes in the intercropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1354 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE CACTUS-SORGHUM INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping was more profitable from the second year.

Taxon
forage cactust0
Outcome
profitabilitye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
from the 2nd yeare0

Verbatim

e0

“showed a higher profitability from the 2nd year of implementation of the irrigation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“FORAGE CACTUS-SORGHUM INTERCROPPING SYSTEMS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–74 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend saline-water-irrigated intercropping for Brazilian semi-arid forage production.

Taxon
Forage cactus and sorghume0
Outcome
intercropping irrigated with saline water is therefore recommended for forage productione0
Setting
Brazilian semi-arid regione0

Verbatim

e0

“Forage cactus and sorghum intercropping irrigated with saline water is therefore recommended for forage production in the Brazilian semi-arid region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1599 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

131 papers: 94 positive, 37 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.