Paper · 2017 · PLoS ONE

Effects of precipitation and clipping intensity on net primary productivity and composition of a Leymus chinensis temperate grassland steppe

Feng He; Kun Wang; David B. Hannaway; et al.

13
claims
31
verbatim quotes
24
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Leymus chinensis (Trin.) is the dominant vegetation type in eastern Eurasian temperate grasslands but is decreasing due to the combined pressure of reduced precipitation and overgrazing. This study evaluated the separate and combined effects of precipitation and defoliation on net primary productivity (NPP) and composition of a L. chinensis steppe to promote the sustainable development of temperate grasslands through improved management practices. The effects of three precipitation gradients (precipitation unchanged, reduced by 50%, and increased by 50%) and two clipping intensities (clipping once or twice per year) were examined on NPP and composition of the L. chinensis community using a 7-year in situ controlled trial at the Guyuan State Key Monitoring and Research Station of Grassland Ecosystem in China. The results showed that: (1) a 50% reduction in natural precipitation significantly decreased NPP; a 50% increase in precipitation did not significantly increase NPP, but it decreased the importance value of L. chinensis because more water promoted the growth of competing species. (2) Clipping twice per year increased NPP, but the increase was from the dry matter of other species (DMO) component, and not from the dry matter of L. chinensis. (3) The standardized coefficients of a regression model (β) for DMO, NPP, and the importance value of L. chinensis were 0.685, 0.532, and -0.608 for precipitation, and 0.369, 0.419, and -0.276 for clipping mode, respectively. This study demonstrated that variation in precipitationis the key driver of NPP and composition of a L. chinensis steppe under the precipitation range and clipping intensities evaluated. This improved understanding of the effects of precipitation and clipping on NPP and composition will allow for improved, sustainable management of L. chinensis temperate grassland steppes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 50% reduction in natural precipitation significantly decreased NPP.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.)Leymus chinensise0
Treatment
50% reduction in natural precipitatione1
Outcome
NPPe1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
natural precipitatione1

Verbatim

e0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“a 50% reduction in natural precipitation significantly decreased NPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 50% precipitation increase did not significantly increase NPP.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.)Leymus chinensise0
Treatment
50% increase in precipitatione1
Outcome
NPPe1
Direction
did not significantly increasee1
Comparator
precipitatione1

Verbatim

e0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“a 50% increase in precipitation did not significantly increase NPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 50% precipitation increase decreased the importance value of L. chinensis.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.)Leymus chinensise0
Treatment
50% increase in precipitatione1
Outcome
importance value of L. chinensise1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
precipitatione1

Verbatim

e0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“a 50% increase in precipitation did not significantly increase NPP, but it decreased the importance value of L. chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1040 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More water promoted competing species growth.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.)Leymus chinensise0
Treatment
more watere1
Outcome
growth of competing speciese1
Direction
promotede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“more water promoted the growth of competing species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping twice per year increased NPP.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.)Leymus chinensise0
Treatment
Clipping twice per yeare1
Outcome
NPPe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“Clipping twice per year increased NPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping twice per year increased the dry matter of other species component.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.)Leymus chinensise0
Treatment
Clipping twice per yeare2
Outcome
dry matter of other species (DMO)e1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“the increase was from the dry matter of other species (DMO) component”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1218 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clipping twice per year increased NPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1143 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping twice per year did not increase L. chinensis dry matter.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.)Leymus chinensise0
Treatment
Clipping twice per yeare2
Outcome
dry matter of L. chinensise1
Direction
note1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“not from the dry matter of L. chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1263 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clipping twice per year increased NPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1143 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Precipitation had a standardized regression coefficient of 0.685 for DMO.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.)Leymus chinensise0
Treatment
precipitatione1
Outcome
DMOe1
Value
0.685e1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“standardized coefficients of a regression model (β) for DMO, NPP, and the importance value of L. chinensis were 0.685, 0.532, and -0.608 for precipitation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1427 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Precipitation had a standardized regression coefficient of 0.532 for NPP.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.)Leymus chinensise0
Treatment
precipitatione1
Outcome
NPPe1
Value
0.532e1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“standardized coefficients of a regression model (β) for DMO, NPP, and the importance value of L. chinensis were 0.685, 0.532, and -0.608 for precipitation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1427 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Precipitation had a standardized regression coefficient of -0.608 for L. chinensis importance value.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.)Leymus chinensise0
Treatment
precipitatione1
Outcome
importance value of L. chinensise1
Value
-0.608e1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“standardized coefficients of a regression model (β) for DMO, NPP, and the importance value of L. chinensis were 0.685, 0.532, and -0.608 for precipitation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1427 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping mode had a standardized regression coefficient of 0.369 for DMO.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.)Leymus chinensise0
Treatment
clipping modee1
Outcome
DMOe2
Value
0.369e1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“0.369, 0.419, and -0.276 for clipping mode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1475 · show in text ↑
e2

“the increase was from the dry matter of other species (DMO) component”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1218 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping mode had a standardized regression coefficient of 0.419 for NPP.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.)Leymus chinensise0
Treatment
clipping modee1
Outcome
NPPe2
Value
0.419e1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“0.369, 0.419, and -0.276 for clipping mode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1475 · show in text ↑
e2

“a 50% reduction in natural precipitation significantly decreased NPP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–917 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping mode had a standardized regression coefficient of -0.276 for L. chinensis importance value.

Taxon
Leymus chinensis (Trin.)Leymus chinensise0
Treatment
clipping modee1
Outcome
importance value of L. chinensise2
Value
-0.276e1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Leymus chinensis (Trin.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–24 · show in text ↑
e1

“0.369, 0.419, and -0.276 for clipping mode”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1475 · show in text ↑
e2

“a 50% increase in precipitation did not significantly increase NPP, but it decreased the importance value of L. chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1040 · show in text ↑

rainfall · yield · Leymus chinensisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mechanical · yield · Leymus chinensisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mechanical · growth · Leymus chinensisPositive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

rainfall · organism · Leymus chinensisResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.