Paper · 2017 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Response of baby corn based intercropping system as influenced by nitrogen management practices

Rekha Rg; Umesh; BK Desai; et al.

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on a clayey soil of North Eastern Dry Zone of Karnataka during kharif 2015 to study the effect of source of nitrogen on yield and economics of baby corn based intercropping systems. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with five main factors and three sub- factors, replicated thrice. Results showed that growth parameters like Plant height, Number of green leaves per plant, Leaf area, Leaf area index and Total dry matter production and among the yield attributes, Cobs plant-1, length of the dehusked cob, cob weight with husk and cob weight without husk was significantly higher with sole baby corn and among nitrogen practices with application of 100% RDN trough chemical fertilizer. Sole baby corn recorded significantly higher green cob yield and green stalk yield among nitrogen practices with application of 100% RDN trough chemical fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole baby corn had significantly higher growth and cob attributes.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
sole baby corne0
Outcome
Plant height, Number of green leaves per plant, Leaf areae0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“growth parameters like Plant height, Number of green leaves per plant, Leaf area, Leaf area index and Total dry matter production and among the yield attributes, Cobs plant-1, length of the dehusked cob, cob weight with husk and cob weight without husk was significantly higher with sole baby corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDN via chemical fertilizer gave significantly higher growth and cob attributes.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
application of 100% RDN trough chemical fertilizere0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparatorOutcome

Verbatim

e0

“was significantly higher with sole baby corn and among nitrogen practices with application of 100% RDN trough chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole baby corn had significantly higher green cob and stalk yield.

Taxon
baby corne0
Treatment
Sole baby corne0
Outcome
green cob yield and green stalk yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sole baby corn recorded significantly higher green cob yield and green stalk yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDN via chemical fertilizer had significantly higher green cob and stalk yield.

Taxon
baby corne1
Treatment
application of 100% RDN trough chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
green cob yield and green stalk yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“green cob yield and green stalk yield among nitrogen practices with application of 100% RDN trough chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–897 · show in text ↑
e1

“sole baby corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–647 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

292 papers: 196 positive, 96 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

94 papers: 60 positive, 34 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.