Abstract
The soybean (Glycine max L.) plant is economically important for the food and animal feed industries due to its nutritional qualities. Soybean crops are highly productive and responsive to new technologies. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of Penergetic-P and Penergetic-K on the dry weight of shoot (DWS), dry weight of root (DWR), total dry weight (DWT), dry weight of nodules (DWN), number of nodules per plant (NNP), level of N in the shoot (NS), chlorophyll index, plant height and soybean yield. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design with three replications. The means were compared by ANOVA and Duncan test (p ≤ 0.05). Differences among treatments for NNP were not significantly evident, but observed for DWN. The application of Penergetic-K in soil increased significantly the DWN in comparison with the application of only NPK and micronutrients. The DWR, DWS, DWT and the DWS/DWR ratio didn’t differ significantly among the treatments as well as the chlorophyll index and NS. The grain yield was significantly lower with the addition of NPK + micronutrients and significantly higher with the addition of Penergetic-K. The Penergetic-K promoted an increased soybean yield, up to 20% compared to the treatment with only NPK + micronutrients. It was concluded that the use of Penergetic benefits the soybean production and the soil quality.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Penergetic-K applied in soil significantly increased nodule dry weight compared with NPK and micronutrients alone in soybean.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- application of Penergetic-K in soile1
- Outcome
- DWNe1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- only NPK and micronutrientse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The application of Penergetic-K in soil increased significantly the DWN in comparison with the application of only NPK and micronutrients”
t0“GROWTH AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN WITH PENERGETIC APPLICATION”
Claim · model-written summary
Differences among Penergetic treatments in number of nodules per plant were not significant in soybean.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- Penergetic-P and Penergetic-Ke0
- Outcome
- NNPe2
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede2
- Comparator
- among treatmentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The aim of this study was to assess the effect of Penergetic-P and Penergetic-K on the dry weight of shoot (DWS), dry weight of root (DWR), total dry weight (DWT), dry weight of nodules (DWN), number of nodules per plant (NNP), level of N in the shoot (NS), chlorophyll index, plant height and soybean yield”
e2“Differences among treatments for NNP were not significantly evident”
t0“GROWTH AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN WITH PENERGETIC APPLICATION”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry weight of root, shoot and total plant did not differ significantly among treatments in soybean.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- Penergetic-P and Penergetic-Ke0
- Outcome
- DWR, DWS, DWTe3
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede3
- Comparator
- among the treatmentse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The aim of this study was to assess the effect of Penergetic-P and Penergetic-K on the dry weight of shoot (DWS), dry weight of root (DWR), total dry weight (DWT), dry weight of nodules (DWN), number of nodules per plant (NNP), level of N in the shoot (NS), chlorophyll index, plant height and soybean yield”
e3“The DWR, DWS, DWT and the DWS/DWR ratio didn’t differ significantly among the treatments as well as the chlorophyll index and NS”
t0“GROWTH AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN WITH PENERGETIC APPLICATION”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoot-to-root dry weight ratio did not differ significantly among treatments in soybean.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- Penergetic-P and Penergetic-Ke0
- Outcome
- DWS/DWR ratioe3
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede3
- Comparator
- among the treatmentse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The aim of this study was to assess the effect of Penergetic-P and Penergetic-K on the dry weight of shoot (DWS), dry weight of root (DWR), total dry weight (DWT), dry weight of nodules (DWN), number of nodules per plant (NNP), level of N in the shoot (NS), chlorophyll index, plant height and soybean yield”
e3“The DWR, DWS, DWT and the DWS/DWR ratio didn’t differ significantly among the treatments as well as the chlorophyll index and NS”
t0“GROWTH AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN WITH PENERGETIC APPLICATION”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorophyll index did not differ significantly among treatments in soybean.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- Penergetic-P and Penergetic-Ke0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll indexe3
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede3
- Comparator
- among the treatmentse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The aim of this study was to assess the effect of Penergetic-P and Penergetic-K on the dry weight of shoot (DWS), dry weight of root (DWR), total dry weight (DWT), dry weight of nodules (DWN), number of nodules per plant (NNP), level of N in the shoot (NS), chlorophyll index, plant height and soybean yield”
e3“The DWR, DWS, DWT and the DWS/DWR ratio didn’t differ significantly among the treatments as well as the chlorophyll index and NS”
t0“GROWTH AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN WITH PENERGETIC APPLICATION”
Claim · model-written summary
Level of N in the shoot did not differ significantly among treatments in soybean.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- Penergetic-P and Penergetic-Ke0
- Outcome
- level of N in the shoote0
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede3
- Comparator
- among the treatmentse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The aim of this study was to assess the effect of Penergetic-P and Penergetic-K on the dry weight of shoot (DWS), dry weight of root (DWR), total dry weight (DWT), dry weight of nodules (DWN), number of nodules per plant (NNP), level of N in the shoot (NS), chlorophyll index, plant height and soybean yield”
e3“The DWR, DWS, DWT and the DWS/DWR ratio didn’t differ significantly among the treatments as well as the chlorophyll index and NS”
t0“GROWTH AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN WITH PENERGETIC APPLICATION”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield was significantly lower with the addition of NPK plus micronutrients in soybean.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- addition of NPK + micronutrientse4
- Outcome
- grain yielde4
- Direction
- lowere4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The grain yield was significantly lower with the addition of NPK + micronutrients and significantly higher with the addition of Penergetic-K”
t0“GROWTH AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN WITH PENERGETIC APPLICATION”
Claim · model-written summary
Penergetic-K significantly increased soybean yield by up to 20% compared with NPK plus micronutrients alone.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- addition of Penergetic-Ke4
- Outcome
- soybean yielde5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Value
- up to 20%e5
- Comparator
- treatment with only NPK + micronutrientse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The grain yield was significantly lower with the addition of NPK + micronutrients and significantly higher with the addition of Penergetic-K”
e5“The Penergetic-K promoted an increased soybean yield, up to 20% compared to the treatment with only NPK + micronutrients”
t0“GROWTH AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN WITH PENERGETIC APPLICATION”
Claim · model-written summary
The use of Penergetic is concluded to benefit soybean production and soil quality.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- use of Penergetice6
- Outcome
- soybean production and the soil qualitye6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“It was concluded that the use of Penergetic benefits the soybean production and the soil quality”
t0“GROWTH AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN WITH PENERGETIC APPLICATION”
The same questions in other papers
micronutrient · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,021 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,188 papers more in this group
See all 1,192 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.