Paper · 2018 · Crop Science

Development of Genomic Prediction in Sorghum

Colleen H. Hunt; Fred A. van Eeuwijk; Emma S. Mace; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
47
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Genomic selection can increase the rate of genetic gain in plant breeding programs by shortening the breeding cycle. Gain can also be increased through higher selection intensities, as the size of the population available for selection can be increased by predicting performance of non‐phenotyped, but genotyped, lines. This paper demonstrates the application of genomic prediction in a sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] breeding program and compares different genomic prediction models incorporating relationship information derived from molecular markers and pedigree information. In cross‐validation, the models using marker‐based relationships had higher selection accuracy than the selection accuracy for models that used pedigree‐based relationships. It was demonstrated that genotypes that have not been included in the trials could be predicted quite accurately using marker information alone. The accuracy of prediction declined as the genomic relationship of the predicted individual to the training population declined. We also demonstrate that the accuracy of genomic breeding values from the prediction error variance derived from the mixed model equations is a useful indicator of the accuracy of prediction. This will be useful to plant breeders, as the accuracy of the genomic predictions can be assessed with confidence before phenotypes are available. Four distinct environments were studied and shown to perform very differently with respect to the accuracy of predictions and the composition of estimated breeding values. This paper shows that there is considerable potential for sorghum breeding programs to benefit from the implementation of genomic selection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marker-based relationship models had higher selection accuracy than pedigree-based models.

Outcome
selection accuracye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
models that used pedigree‐based relationshipse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In cross‐validation, the models using marker‐based relationships had higher selection accuracy than the selection accuracy for models that used pedigree‐based relationships.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–761 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marker data alone predicted sorghum genotypes absent from trials quite accurately.

Outcome
predicted quite accuratelye0
Comparator
genotypes that have not been included in the trialse0

Not reportedTaxonValue

Verbatim

e0

“It was demonstrated that genotypes that have not been included in the trials could be predicted quite accurately using marker information alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–906 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prediction accuracy declined with decreasing genomic relatedness to the training population.

Outcome
accuracy of predictione0
Direction
declinede0
Comparator
genomic relationship of the predicted individual to the training populatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The accuracy of prediction declined as the genomic relationship of the predicted individual to the training population declined.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1035 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Accuracy from prediction error variance was a useful indicator of genomic prediction accuracy.

Outcome
accuracy of predictione0
Comparator
accuracy of genomic breeding values from the prediction error variancee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the accuracy of genomic breeding values from the prediction error variance derived from the mixed model equations is a useful indicator of the accuracy of prediction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1227 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four sorghum environments differed substantially in prediction accuracy and estimated breeding value composition.

Outcome
accuracy of predictions and the composition of estimated breeding valuese0
Direction
very differentlye0
Setting
Four distinct environmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Four distinct environments were studied and shown to perform very differently with respect to the accuracy of predictions and the composition of estimated breeding values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1546 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors see considerable potential for genomic selection in sorghum breeding.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Outcome
implementation of genomic selectione0
Qualifier
considerable potentiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This paper shows that there is considerable potential for sorghum breeding programs to benefit from the implementation of genomic selection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1687 · show in text ↑