Paper · 2010 · \n Volume: 39, Issue: 1-2-3\n 1-8\n \n

TÜRKIYE'nin Değişik Yörelerinden Alınan Patates ve Domates Bitkilerinde Görülen Stolbur Phytoplasma Enfeksiyonları

Behçet Kemal Çağlar; Toufic Elbeaino; Mustafa Küsek; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

During August 2012, a survey and identification of phytoplasmas associated with diseased potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and tomato (Solanum lycopersycum L.) plants were conducted in four regions, in Turkey. Potato samples with reddish or purplish discoloration and rolling of leaves symptoms were gathered from “Kayseri and Sivas” provinces, whilst tomato samples were collected form plants exhibiting floral abnormalities, sepal hypertrophy, virescence and phyllody symptoms, from Kahramanmaraş and Adana provinces. All symptomatic plants of both species reacted positively when assayed by direct polymerase chain reactions (PCR) using universal primer pair R16F1/R16R0 and nested PCR using R16F2n/R16R2 primers. Phytoplasmas were detected in 32 symptomatic plants, out of 40 samples collected. However, no PCR amplicon products were obtained from the asymptomatic ones (8 plants). BLAST sequence analysis of the 16SrDNA amplicons (1250 bp) showed that the phytoplasma found in potato and tomato samples resembled “Candidatus phytoplama solani” (16SrXII-A ribosomal subgroup member) and shared with this last 99.8% sequence identity. Similar PCR and sequence results were obtained from Cicadula inornata (Cicadellidae), insects collected from affected tomato plants in surveyed fields, when were assayed by PCR and 16SrDNA-sequenced. The RFLP profile of the 1250 bp PCR fragments, restricted with 7 different endonucleases (EcoRI, TaqI, HhaI, AluI, MseI, RsaI and HpaII) usually used for phytoplasma subgroups differentiation, showed identical patterns to “Candidatus phytoplasma solani”. RFLP results were in harmony with the phylogenetic tree constructed with the sequences obtained, which grouped in one cluster all stolbur phytoplasma from Turkey and those of 16SrXII-A ribosomal subgroup members. To our knowledge, all phytoplasma diseases were detected from potatoes and tomatoes in Kayseri, Sivas, Adana and Kahramanmaraş provinces are same phytoplasma. Further investigations are needed to determine whether Cicadula inornata insect, trapped from affected plants is a potential vector responsible for the transmission of this phytoplasma in that area, where tomatoes are grown in Turkey

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Symptomatic potato and tomato plants tested positive by PCR, with phytoplasmas detected in 32 of 40 samples.

Interactor
PhytoplasmasCandidatus Phytoplasmae0pathogen
Outcome
Phytoplasmas were detectede0
Value
32 symptomatic plants, out of 40 samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Candidatus Phytoplasma
Candidatus Phytoplasma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Estreya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All symptomatic plants of both species reacted positively when assayed by direct polymerase chain reactions (PCR) using universal primer pair R16F1/R16R0 and nested PCR using R16F2n/R16R2 primers. Phytoplasmas were detected in 32 symptomatic plants, out of 40 samples collected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–794 · show in text ↑
e1

“BLAST sequence analysis of the 16SrDNA amplicons (1250 bp) showed that the phytoplasma found in potato and tomato samples resembled “Candidatus phytoplama solani” (16SrXII-A ribosomal subgroup member) and shared with this last 99.8% sequence identity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No PCR products were obtained from eight asymptomatic plants.

Taxon
Patatest0
Outcome
no PCR amplicon productse0
Value
8 plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“However, no PCR amplicon products were obtained from the asymptomatic ones (8 plants).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“Patates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytoplasma sequences from potato and tomato resembled Candidatus phytoplama solani with 99.8% identity.

Interactor
“Candidatus phytoplama solani”e0pathogen
Outcome
sequence identitye0
Value
99.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BLAST sequence analysis of the 16SrDNA amplicons (1250 bp) showed that the phytoplasma found in potato and tomato samples resembled “Candidatus phytoplama solani” (16SrXII-A ribosomal subgroup member) and shared with this last 99.8% sequence identity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cicadula inornata from affected tomato plants gave similar PCR and sequence results.

Taxon
Cicadula inornatae0
Outcome
Similar PCR and sequence resultse0
Setting
surveyed fieldse0

Verbatim

e0

“Similar PCR and sequence results were obtained from Cicadula inornata (Cicadellidae), insects collected from affected tomato plants in surveyed fields, when were assayed by PCR and 16SrDNA-sequenced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1333 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RFLP patterns matched Candidatus phytoplasma solani.

Taxon
“Candidatus phytoplasma solani”Candidatus Phytoplasma solanie0
Outcome
identical patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Candidatus Phytoplasma solani
Candidatus Phytoplasma solani · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RFLP profile of the 1250 bp PCR fragments, restricted with 7 different endonucleases (EcoRI, TaqI, HhaI, AluI, MseI, RsaI and HpaII) usually used for phytoplasma subgroups differentiation, showed identical patterns to “Candidatus phytoplasma solani”.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1588 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phylogenetic analysis grouped Turkey stolbur phytoplasmas with 16SrXII-A subgroup members.

Taxon
stolbur phytoplasmaCandidatus Phytoplasma solanie0
Outcome
grouped in one clustere0
Setting
Turkeye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Candidatus Phytoplasma solani
Candidatus Phytoplasma solani · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RFLP results were in harmony with the phylogenetic tree constructed with the sequences obtained, which grouped in one cluster all stolbur phytoplasma from Turkey and those of 16SrXII-A ribosomal subgroup members.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1801 · show in text ↑