Paper · 2007 · Plant Protection Science

Differences in growth and yield responses to Aphis gossypii Glover between different okra varieties

Hail K. Shannag; Jafer M. Al-Qudah; Ibrahim M. Makhadmeh; et al.

15
claims
23
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The reactions of five commercial varieties of okra, Abelmoschus esculentus, to A. gossypii were evaluated under semiarid field conditions. Each experimental plant of varieties Clemson spineless, Clemson spineless 80, Lee, Perkins dwarf, and Local was infested 60 days after emergence by three late-nymphal instars of the aphid. The results showed that aphid populations increased constantly on the varieties, except for days 42 and 49 after infestation, attaining a peak at about the end of the growing season. Differences in aphid densities were recorded between varieties. The aphids were most numerous on var. Local, while lowest in number on var. Lee. Infestation by aphids on okra varieties reduced yield by 57% on var. Perkins dwarf, 56% on var. Lee, 24% on var. Clemson spineless, 21% on var. Clemson spineless 80, and 5% on var. Local. Reduction in the number of pods produced per plant followed the same pattern as observed for total yield. Aphids had not altered significantly the vegetative plant growth at day 37 following infestation. At day 66, a substantial decrease in shoot fresh and dry weights and also leaf area was evident on var. Perkins dwarf while on var. Clemson spineless only the leaf area was significantly reduced. Moreover, aphid-free controls varied widely in their growth and productivity at the end of growing season. Varieties Clemson spineless and Clemson spineless 80 produced the highest total yield and pod numbers, var. Local the lowest. The varieties Perkins dwarf and Clemson spineless produced significantly higher shoot fresh and dry weight, as well as leaf area, than vars. Lee and Local.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid populations rose through the season with exceptions on days 42 and 49.

Taxon
varietiese0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populationse0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that aphid populations increased constantly on the varieties, except for days 42 and 49 after infestation, attaining a peak at about the end of the growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–510 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid densities differed among okra varieties, highest on Local and lowest on Lee.

Taxon
varietiese0
Material
Locale0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
aphid densitiese0
Comparator
Leee0

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in aphid densities were recorded between varieties. The aphids were most numerous on var. Local, while lowest in number on var. Lee.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphids reduced Perkins dwarf yield by 57%.

Material
Perkins dwarfe0
Treatment
Infestation by aphidse0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
57%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infestation by aphids on okra varieties reduced yield by 57% on var. Perkins dwarf, 56% on var. Lee, 24% on var. Clemson spineless, 21% on var. Clemson spineless 80, and 5% on var. Local.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphids reduced Lee yield by 56%.

Material
Leee0
Treatment
Infestation by aphidse0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
56%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infestation by aphids on okra varieties reduced yield by 57% on var. Perkins dwarf, 56% on var. Lee, 24% on var. Clemson spineless, 21% on var. Clemson spineless 80, and 5% on var. Local.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphids reduced Clemson spineless yield by 24%.

Material
Clemson spinelesse0
Treatment
Infestation by aphidse0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infestation by aphids on okra varieties reduced yield by 57% on var. Perkins dwarf, 56% on var. Lee, 24% on var. Clemson spineless, 21% on var. Clemson spineless 80, and 5% on var. Local.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphids reduced Clemson spineless 80 yield by 21%.

Material
Clemson spineless 80e0
Treatment
Infestation by aphidse0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infestation by aphids on okra varieties reduced yield by 57% on var. Perkins dwarf, 56% on var. Lee, 24% on var. Clemson spineless, 21% on var. Clemson spineless 80, and 5% on var. Local.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphids reduced Local yield by 5%.

Material
Locale0
Treatment
Infestation by aphidse0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Infestation by aphids on okra varieties reduced yield by 57% on var. Perkins dwarf, 56% on var. Lee, 24% on var. Clemson spineless, 21% on var. Clemson spineless 80, and 5% on var. Local.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod number per plant followed the same reduction pattern as total yield.

Interactor
Aphis gossypii GloverAphis gossypiit0peste0
Outcome
number of pods produced per plante0
Direction
Reductione0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction in the number of pods produced per plant followed the same pattern as observed for total yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphis gossypii Glover between different okra varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphids had no significant effect on vegetative growth at day 37.

Treatment
Aphidse0
Interactor
AphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
vegetative plant growthe0
Qualifier
day 37 following infestatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aphids had not altered significantly the vegetative plant growth at day 37 following infestation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perkins dwarf shoot fresh and dry weight and leaf area declined at day 66.

Material
Perkins dwarfe0
Interactor
Aphis gossypii GloverAphis gossypiit0peste0
Outcome
shoot fresh and dry weights and also leaf areae0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At day 66, a substantial decrease in shoot fresh and dry weights and also leaf area was evident on var. Perkins dwarf while on var. Clemson spineless only the leaf area was significantly reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1243 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphis gossypii Glover between different okra varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clemson spineless leaf area decreased significantly at day 66.

Material
Clemson spinelesse0
Interactor
Aphis gossypii GloverAphis gossypiit0peste0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At day 66, a substantial decrease in shoot fresh and dry weights and also leaf area was evident on var. Perkins dwarf while on var. Clemson spineless only the leaf area was significantly reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1243 · show in text ↑
t0

“Aphis gossypii Glover between different okra varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–99 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid free controls varied widely in growth and productivity.

Outcome
growth and productivitye0
Qualifier
aphid-free controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, aphid-free controls varied widely in their growth and productivity at the end of growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clemson spineless and Clemson spineless 80 had the highest yield and pod counts.

Material
Clemson spineless and Clemson spineless 80e0
Outcome
total yield and pod numberse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Locale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Varieties Clemson spineless and Clemson spineless 80 produced the highest total yield and pod numbers, var. Local the lowest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Local had the lowest yield and pod counts.

Material
Locale0
Outcome
total yield and pod numberse0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Varieties Clemson spineless and Clemson spineless 80 produced the highest total yield and pod numbers, var. Local the lowest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Perkins dwarf and Clemson spineless had higher shoot weight and leaf area than Lee and Local.

Material
Perkins dwarf and Clemson spinelesse0
Outcome
shoot fresh and dry weight, as well as leaf areae0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Lee and Locale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The varieties Perkins dwarf and Clemson spineless produced significantly higher shoot fresh and dry weight, as well as leaf area, than vars. Lee and Local.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1632 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑