Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola in Rice Using Bacterial Strains

Ram Sharan; Gurpreet Singh; Raj kumar; et al.

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To study the effect of eleven strains of rhizobacteria, namely Azotobacter chroococcum (103, MSX-9, HT-54 and BNR-6), Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus (CO 99-70, 35-47 and 760-50), Bacillus spp (91 and 65), Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas maltophila were used on rice (cv. PR-106) infected with Meloidogyne graminicola under greenhouse conditions. Soaking of seed for five minutes in plain water was treated as untreated check. After 45 days of sowing results indicated that all the rhizobacterial strains significantly increased the plant height and weight and reduced the number of galls/plant and multiplication of M. graminicola on rice significantly over untreated check, except A. chroococcum strain 103. Maximum plant height (6.75cm) was recorded in G. diazotrophicus strain 760-50 and B. spp. 91. Similarly, maximum plant weight 0.83g and 0.93g recorded in both treatments, respectively. However, maximum reduction of nematode population (0.5 and 0.6) times was observed in G. diazotrophicus strain 760-50 and A. chroococcum strain BNR-6, respectively over untreated check (1.5).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All rhizobacterial strains except A. chroococcum strain 103 significantly increased rice plant height and weight.

Treatment
rhizobacterial strainse1
Outcome
plant height and weighte1
Direction
significantly increasede1
Qualifier
except A. chroococcum strain 103e2
Comparator
untreated checke2
Setting
greenhouse conditionse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the rhizobacterial strains significantly increased the plant height and weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–565 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly over untreated check, except A. chroococcum strain 103”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–717 · show in text ↑
e3

“under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–354 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacterial strains reduced galls per plant and M. graminicola multiplication on rice.

Treatment
rhizobacterial strainse2
Interactor
M. graminicolaMeloidogyne graminicolae1pest
Second interactor
rhizobacterial strainse2symbiont
Outcome
number of galls/plant and multiplicatione1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
untreated checke3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduced the number of galls/plant and multiplication of M. graminicola on rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–648 · show in text ↑
e2

“all the rhizobacterial strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–513 · show in text ↑
e3

“significantly over untreated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus strain 760-50 gave the maximum rice plant height of 6.75 cm.

Treatment
G. diazotrophicus strain 760-50e1
Interactor
G. diazotrophicus strain 760-50Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicuse1symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
Maximume1
Value
6.75cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum plant height (6.75cm) was recorded in G. diazotrophicus strain 760-50 and B. spp. 91”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus spp. strain 91 gave the maximum rice plant height of 6.75 cm.

Treatment
B. spp. 91e1
Interactor
B. spp. 91e1symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
Maximume1
Value
6.75cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum plant height (6.75cm) was recorded in G. diazotrophicus strain 760-50 and B. spp. 91”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum plant weight of 0.83 g and 0.93 g was recorded for the two top strains.

Treatment
G. diazotrophicus strain 760-50 and B. spp. 91e1
Outcome
plant weighte2
Direction
maximume2
Value
0.83g and 0.93ge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“G. diazotrophicus strain 760-50 and B. spp. 91”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–811 · show in text ↑
e2

“Similarly, maximum plant weight 0.83g and 0.93g recorded in both treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus strain 760-50 gave the largest reduction in nematode population, 0.5-fold over untreated check.

Treatment
G. diazotrophicus strain 760-50e1
Interactor
G. diazotrophicus strain 760-50Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicuse1symbiont
Outcome
nematode populatione1
Direction
maximum reductione1
Value
0.5e1
Qualifier
1.5e1
Comparator
untreated checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, maximum reduction of nematode population (0.5 and 0.6) times was observed in G. diazotrophicus strain 760-50 and A. chroococcum strain BNR-6, respectively over untreated check (1.5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter chroococcum strain BNR-6 gave the largest reduction of nematode population after the top strain, 0.6-fold over untreated check.

Treatment
A. chroococcum strain BNR-6e1
Interactor
A. chroococcum strain BNR-6Azotobacter chroococcume1symbiont
Outcome
nematode populatione1
Direction
maximum reductione1
Value
0.6e1
Qualifier
1.5e1
Comparator
untreated checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, maximum reduction of nematode population (0.5 and 0.6) times was observed in G. diazotrophicus strain 760-50 and A. chroococcum strain BNR-6, respectively over untreated check (1.5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1094 · show in text ↑

Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azotobacter chroococcum · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.