Paper · 2018 · PLoS ONE

Weeds and ground-dwelling predators′ response to two different weed management systems in glyphosate-tolerant cotton: A farm-scale study

Esteban García-Ruiz; Íñigo Loureiro; Gema P. Farinós; et al.

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The use of glyphosate, as a post-emergence broad-spectrum herbicide in genetically modified glyphosate-tolerant (GT) cotton, supposes a big change in weed management programs with respect to a conventional regime. Thus, alterations in arable flora and arthropod fauna must be considered when evaluating their potential impacts. A 3-year farm-scale study was conducted in a 2-ha GT cotton crop, in southern Spain, to compare the effects of conventional and glyphosate herbicide regimes on weed abundance and diversity and their consequences for ground-dwelling predators. Surveys reveal that weed density was relatively low within all treatments with a few dominant species, with significantly higher weed densities and modifications of the floristic composition in glyphosate-treated plots that led to an increase in the abundance of Portulaca oleracea and to a reduction in plant diversity. The activity-density of the main predatory arthropod taxa (spiders, ground beetles, rove beetles and earwigs) varied among years, but no significant differences were obtained between conventional and glyphosate herbicide regimes. However, significant differences between treatments were obtained for ground beetles species richness and diversity, being higher under the glyphosate herbicide regime, and a positive correlation with weed density could be established for both parameters. The implications of these findings to weed control in GT cotton are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed density was low in all cotton treatments.

Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
relatively lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed density was relatively low within all treatments with a few dominant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weeds and ground-dwelling predators′ response to two different weed management systems in glyphosate-tolerant cotton: A farm-scale study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate plots had significantly higher weed density.

Treatment
glyphosate-treated plotse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventionale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher weed densities and modifications of the floristic composition in glyphosate-treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–789 · show in text ↑
e1

“no significant differences were obtained between conventional and glyphosate herbicide regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weeds and ground-dwelling predators′ response to two different weed management systems in glyphosate-tolerant cotton: A farm-scale study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate altered weed floristic composition.

Treatment
glyphosate-treated plotse0
Outcome
floristic compositione0
Comparator
conventionale1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“modifications of the floristic composition in glyphosate-treated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–789 · show in text ↑
e1

“no significant differences were obtained between conventional and glyphosate herbicide regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weeds and ground-dwelling predators′ response to two different weed management systems in glyphosate-tolerant cotton: A farm-scale study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate increased Portulaca oleracea abundance.

Treatment
glyphosate-treated plotse0
Interactor
Portulaca oleraceaPortulaca oleraceae0weed
Outcome
abundance of Portulaca oleraceae0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
conventionale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Portulaca oleracea
Portulaca oleracea · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glyphosate-treated plots that led to an increase in the abundance of Portulaca oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–852 · show in text ↑
e1

“no significant differences were obtained between conventional and glyphosate herbicide regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weeds and ground-dwelling predators′ response to two different weed management systems in glyphosate-tolerant cotton: A farm-scale study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate reduced plant diversity.

Treatment
glyphosate-treated plotse0
Outcome
plant diversitye0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
conventionale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glyphosate-treated plots that led to an increase in the abundance of Portulaca oleracea and to a reduction in plant diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–890 · show in text ↑
e1

“no significant differences were obtained between conventional and glyphosate herbicide regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weeds and ground-dwelling predators′ response to two different weed management systems in glyphosate-tolerant cotton: A farm-scale study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predator activity density varied among years.

Outcome
activity-density of the main predatory arthropod taxae0
Direction
variede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity-density of the main predatory arthropod taxa (spiders, ground beetles, rove beetles and earwigs) varied among years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weeds and ground-dwelling predators′ response to two different weed management systems in glyphosate-tolerant cotton: A farm-scale study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Predator activity density did not differ significantly between herbicide regimes.

Treatment
glyphosate herbicide regimese0
Outcome
activity-densitye1
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
conventionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences were obtained between conventional and glyphosate herbicide regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1120 · show in text ↑
e1

“The activity-density of the main predatory arthropod taxa (spiders, ground beetles, rove beetles and earwigs) varied among years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weeds and ground-dwelling predators′ response to two different weed management systems in glyphosate-tolerant cotton: A farm-scale study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ground beetle species richness and diversity were significantly higher with glyphosate.

Treatment
glyphosate herbicide regimee0
Outcome
ground beetles species richness and diversitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventionale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ground beetles species richness and diversity, being higher under the glyphosate herbicide regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1289 · show in text ↑
e1

“no significant differences were obtained between conventional and glyphosate herbicide regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weeds and ground-dwelling predators′ response to two different weed management systems in glyphosate-tolerant cotton: A farm-scale study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ground beetle richness and diversity correlated positively with weed density.

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
ground beetles species richness and diversitye1
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a positive correlation with weed density could be established for both parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1376 · show in text ↑
e1

“ground beetles species richness and diversity, being higher under the glyphosate herbicide regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“Weeds and ground-dwelling predators′ response to two different weed management systems in glyphosate-tolerant cotton: A farm-scale study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–136 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.