Abstract
The field experiment was conducted during kharif season of 2015 at Crop Research Farm SHUATS, Allahabad. The experiment was carried out to find the performance of different Levels of phosphorus and biofertilizers (PSB and VAM) on Growth and Yield of Hybrid Maize, which laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) & replicated thrice. The experiment finding revealed that the treatment T9 (80 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM) significantly performed better than all other treatments viz; Plant height (187.08 cm), Number of leaves (10.58), while treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM) performed better than all other treatments viz; Dry weight (51.72 g), Cob length (18.94 cm), Cob weight (241.08 g), Grain yield (4.95 t ha–1), Straw yield (7.45 t ha–1), Test weight (28.10 g) and Harvest index (39.98%). While the same treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM) recorded highest gross return (65653.75 Rs ha–1), net return (38416.75 Rs ha–1) and B: C ratio (1.41), however treatment T3 (40 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM) was found statistically at par with treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
T9 had the best maize plant height at 187.08 cm.
- Treatment
- treatment T9 (80 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM)e0
- Outcome
- Plant heighte0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 187.08 cme0
- Comparator
- all other treatmentse0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T9 (80 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM) significantly performed better than all other treatments viz; Plant height (187.08 cm)”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
T9 had the best maize leaf number at 10.58.
- Treatment
- treatment T9 (80 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM)e0
- Outcome
- Number of leavese0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 10.58e0
- Comparator
- all other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T9 (80 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM) significantly performed better than all other treatments viz; Plant height (187.08 cm), Number of leaves (10.58)”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 led other treatments in maize dry weight at 51.72 g.
- Treatment
- treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM)e0
- Outcome
- Dry weighte0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 51.72 ge0
- Comparator
- all other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM) performed better than all other treatments viz; Dry weight (51.72 g)”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 led other treatments in cob length at 18.94 cm.
- Treatment
- treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM)e0
- Outcome
- Cob lengthe0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 18.94 cme0
- Comparator
- all other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM) performed better than all other treatments viz; Dry weight (51.72 g), Cob length (18.94 cm)”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 led other treatments in cob weight at 241.08 g.
- Treatment
- treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM)e0
- Outcome
- Cob weighte0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 241.08 ge0
- Comparator
- all other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM) performed better than all other treatments viz; Dry weight (51.72 g), Cob length (18.94 cm), Cob weight (241.08 g)”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 led other treatments in grain yield at 4.95 t ha–1.
- Treatment
- treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM)e0
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 4.95 t ha–1e0
- Comparator
- all other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM) performed better than all other treatments viz; Dry weight (51.72 g), Cob length (18.94 cm), Cob weight (241.08 g), Grain yield (4.95 t ha–1)”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 led other treatments in straw yield at 7.45 t ha–1.
- Treatment
- treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM)e0
- Outcome
- Straw yielde0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 7.45 t ha–1e0
- Comparator
- all other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM) performed better than all other treatments viz; Dry weight (51.72 g), Cob length (18.94 cm), Cob weight (241.08 g), Grain yield (4.95 t ha–1), Straw yield (7.45 t ha–1)”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 led other treatments in test weight at 28.10 g.
- Treatment
- treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM)e0
- Outcome
- Test weighte0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 28.10 ge0
- Comparator
- all other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM) performed better than all other treatments viz; Dry weight (51.72 g), Cob length (18.94 cm), Cob weight (241.08 g), Grain yield (4.95 t ha–1), Straw yield (7.45 t ha–1), Test weight (28.10 g)”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 led other treatments in harvest index at 39.98%.
- Treatment
- treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM)e0
- Outcome
- Harvest indexe0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 39.98%e0
- Comparator
- all other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM) performed better than all other treatments viz; Dry weight (51.72 g), Cob length (18.94 cm), Cob weight (241.08 g), Grain yield (4.95 t ha–1), Straw yield (7.45 t ha–1), Test weight (28.10 g) and Harvest index (39.98%)”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 recorded the highest gross return at 65653.75 Rs ha–1.
- Treatment
- treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM)e0
- Outcome
- gross returne0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 65653.75 Rs ha–1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM) recorded highest gross return (65653.75 Rs ha–1)”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 recorded the highest net return at 38416.75 Rs ha–1.
- Treatment
- treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM)e0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 38416.75 Rs ha–1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM) recorded highest gross return (65653.75 Rs ha–1), net return (38416.75 Rs ha–1)”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
T6 recorded the highest benefit to cost ratio at 1.41.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM) recorded highest gross return (65653.75 Rs ha–1), net return (38416.75 Rs ha–1) and B: C ratio (1.41)”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
T3 was statistically at par with T6.
- Treatment
- treatment T3 (40 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM)e0
- Outcome
- statistically at pare0
- Comparator
- treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM)e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“treatment T3 (40 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM) was found statistically at par with treatment T6 (60 kg ha-1 P + PSB+VAM)”
t0“maize”
The same questions in other papers
mycorrhiza · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
109 papers more in this group
See all 113 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
168 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
184 papers more in this group
See all 188 papers →mycorrhiza · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.