Paper · 2018 · Agronomy Journal

Maize Yield Response to Nitrogen Rate and Plant Density under Film Mulching

Ting Li; Jianliang Liu; Shaojie Wang; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
36
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas Film mulching significantly improved soil moisture. Film mulching required a higher N rate and plant density for maximum maize productivity. Optimum management can improve maize production and water use in semiarid regions. Film mulching has significantly improved crop productivity in semiarid areas. We hypothesized that plants grown under the film‐mulched system (FM) require higher N rates and higher plant densities than the non‐mulched system (NM) to optimize grain yield and water use efficiency (WUE). A 2‐yr field experiment was conducted at the Changwu experimental station to evaluate the effects of N supply and plant density on grain yield, yield components, evapotranspiration, and WUE in spring maize ( Zea mays L.) with and without film mulching. Results showed that FM improved topsoil water content. Mulch practice × N rate and mulch practice × plant density interactions existed for yield and WUE in both years. Regression analysis showed that yield and WUE increased with increasing N rate and plant density for FM. The predicted maximum yield (14.3 and 15.1 Mg ha −1 in 2013 and 2014, respectively) and WUE (31.3 and 38.4 kg ha −1 mm −1 in 2013 and 2014, respectively) for FM were obtained at 280 kg N ha −1 and 80,000 plants ha −1 . Lower N amounts and lower plant densities were required for NM to obtain the maximum yield and WUE. However, field experiments showed that the N amount of 225 kg ha −1 in FM increased N use efficiency while yielding >94% of the maximum. In conclusion, film mulching together with optimum N application rates and plant densities can improve maize production and WUE in semiarid regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulching increased topsoil water content.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
FMe0
Outcome
topsoil water contente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that FM improved topsoil water content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Yield Response to Nitrogen Rate and Plant Density under Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch practice interacted with nitrogen rate for yield and water use efficiency in both years.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Mulch practice × N ratee0
Outcome
yield and WUEe0
Qualifier
in both yearse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulch practice × N rate and mulch practice × plant density interactions existed for yield and WUE in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Yield Response to Nitrogen Rate and Plant Density under Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulch practice interacted with plant density for yield and water use efficiency in both years.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mulch practice × plant densitye0
Outcome
yield and WUEe0
Qualifier
in both yearse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulch practice × N rate and mulch practice × plant density interactions existed for yield and WUE in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Yield Response to Nitrogen Rate and Plant Density under Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under film mulch, yield increased with nitrogen rate and plant density.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increasing N rate and plant densitye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
FMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and WUE increased with increasing N rate and plant density for FM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Yield Response to Nitrogen Rate and Plant Density under Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under film mulch, water use efficiency increased with nitrogen rate and plant density.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increasing N rate and plant densitye0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
FMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and WUE increased with increasing N rate and plant density for FM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1046 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Yield Response to Nitrogen Rate and Plant Density under Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted maximum film mulch yield in 2013 was 14.3 Mg ha −1 at 280 kg N ha −1 and 80,000 plants ha −1.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
280 kg N ha −1 and 80,000 plants ha −1e0
Outcome
maximum yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
14.3 and 15.1 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
in 2013 and 2014, respectivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The predicted maximum yield (14.3 and 15.1 Mg ha −1 in 2013 and 2014, respectively) and WUE (31.3 and 38.4 kg ha −1 mm −1 in 2013 and 2014, respectively) for FM were obtained at 280 kg N ha −1 and 80,000 plants ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Yield Response to Nitrogen Rate and Plant Density under Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Predicted maximum film mulch water use efficiency was 31.3 and 38.4 kg ha −1 mm −1 in 2013 and 2014.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
280 kg N ha −1 and 80,000 plants ha −1e0
Outcome
WUEe0
Value
31.3 and 38.4 kg ha −1 mm −1e0
Qualifier
in 2013 and 2014, respectivelye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WUE (31.3 and 38.4 kg ha −1 mm −1 in 2013 and 2014, respectively) for FM were obtained at 280 kg N ha −1 and 80,000 plants ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Yield Response to Nitrogen Rate and Plant Density under Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nonmulched system needed lower nitrogen and density for maximum yield and water use efficiency.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
NMe0
Outcome
maximum yield and WUEe0
Direction
Lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower N amounts and lower plant densities were required for NM to obtain the maximum yield and WUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Yield Response to Nitrogen Rate and Plant Density under Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In film mulch, 225 kg ha −1 nitrogen increased nitrogen use efficiency while achieving over 94% of maximum yield.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
225 kg ha −1 in FMe0
Outcome
N use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
yielding >94% of the maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the N amount of 225 kg ha −1 in FM increased N use efficiency while yielding >94% of the maximum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Yield Response to Nitrogen Rate and Plant Density under Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Film mulch with optimum nitrogen and density can improve maize production and water use efficiency in semiarid regions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
film mulching together with optimum N application rates and plant densitiese0
Setting
semiarid regionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“film mulching together with optimum N application rates and plant densities can improve maize production and WUE in semiarid regions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1651 · show in text ↑

mulching · nutrient: efficiency · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

mulching · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

112 papers: 97 positive, 15 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

108 papers more in this group

See all 112 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.