Paper · 1968 · Journal of Range Management

Production and Persistence of Wild Annual Peanuts in Bahia and Bermudagrass Sods

E. R. Beaty; John D. Powell; Robert L. Stanley

11
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A wild annual forage peanut was seeded in Pensacola bahiagrass and Coastal bermudagrass sods and found to persist for at least 3 years and showed indications of persisting for a much longer time. The peanut can be established by either preparation of a seed bed and planting or by seeding directly into the undisturbed sod. Preparation of a seed bed before planting improved peanut establishment but reduced total forage yields for at least one season. The total forage yield of the grass and peanut was not higher than that of the grass alone. Adding P and K fertilizers did not increase forage yields of either the peanut or grass over a 3-year period. A 50 lb/acre application of N increased total forage production but reduced the amount of peanut forage produced. In range areas of the Southeast and probably throughout much of Latin America where little N is applied, the forage peanut is one of the first tropical legumes to show promise in grasslegume mixtures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild annual forage peanut persisted for at least three years in the grass sods.

Taxon
wild annual forage peanute0
Outcome
persist for at least 3 yearse0
Setting
Pensacola bahiagrass and Coastal bermudagrass sodse0

Verbatim

e0

“A wild annual forage peanut was seeded in Pensacola bahiagrass and Coastal bermudagrass sods and found to persist for at least 3 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut could be established with seedbed preparation and planting.

Treatment
preparation of a seed bed and plantinge0
Outcome
establishede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The peanut can be established by either preparation of a seed bed and planting or by seeding directly into the undisturbed sod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–322 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wild Annual Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut could be established by direct seeding into undisturbed sod.

Treatment
seeding directly into the undisturbed sode0
Outcome
establishede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The peanut can be established by either preparation of a seed bed and planting or by seeding directly into the undisturbed sod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedbed preparation improved peanut establishment.

Treatment
Preparation of a seed bed before plantinge0
Outcome
peanut establishmente0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preparation of a seed bed before planting improved peanut establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedbed preparation reduced total forage yield for at least one season.

Treatment
Preparation of a seed bed before plantinge0
Outcome
total forage yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
at least one seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preparation of a seed bed before planting improved peanut establishment but reduced total forage yields for at least one season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–451 · show in text ↑
e1

“The peanut can be established”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass and peanut mixture yield was no higher than grass alone.

Treatment
grass and peanute0
Outcome
total forage yielde0
Direction
not highere0
Comparator
grass alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total forage yield of the grass and peanut was not higher than that of the grass alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P and K fertilizers did not increase peanut forage yields over three years.

Treatment
P and K fertilizerse0
Outcome
forage yields of either the peanute0
Direction
did not increasee0
Qualifier
over a 3-year periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Adding P and K fertilizers did not increase forage yields of either the peanut or grass over a 3-year period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P and K fertilizers did not increase grass forage yields over three years.

Taxon
grasse0
Treatment
P and K fertilizerse0
Outcome
forage yields of either the peanut or grasse0
Direction
did not increasee0
Qualifier
over a 3-year periode0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Adding P and K fertilizers did not increase forage yields of either the peanut or grass over a 3-year period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 50 lb/acre nitrogen increased total forage production.

Treatment
50 lb/acre application of Ne0
Outcome
total forage productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 50 lb/acre application of N increased total forage production but reduced the amount of peanut forage produced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–767 · show in text ↑
e1

“grass and peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–499 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 50 lb/acre nitrogen reduced peanut forage production.

Treatment
50 lb/acre application of Ne0
Outcome
amount of peanut forage producede0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 50 lb/acre application of N increased total forage production but reduced the amount of peanut forage produced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–767 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider forage peanut promising for low nitrogen grass legume mixtures.

Taxon
forage peanute0
Outcome
show promise in grasslegume mixturese0
Qualifier
where little N is appliede0

Verbatim

e0

“where little N is applied, the forage peanut is one of the first tropical legumes to show promise in grasslegume mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–968 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

94 papers: 79 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

145 papers: 125 positive, 20 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

178 papers: 160 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 160 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

174 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

nitrogen · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 635 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

679 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.