Paper · 2018 · Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

Food web associations and effect of trophic resources and environmental factors on parasitoids expanding their host range into non‐native hosts

Henry Murillo Pacheco; Sherah L. Vanlaerhoven; M. Ángeles Marcos García; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Trophic interactions and environmental conditions determine the structure of food webs and the host expansion of parasitoids into novel insect hosts. In this study, we investigate plant–insect–parasitoid food web interactions, specifically the effect of trophic resources and environmental factors on the presence of the parasitoids expanding their host range after the invasion of C hrysodeixis chalcites ( E sper) ( L epidoptera: N octuidae). We also consider potential candidates for biological control of this non‐native pest. A survey of larval stages of P lusiinae ( L epidoptera: N octuidae) and their larval parasitoids was conducted in field and vegetable greenhouse crops in 2009 and 2010 in various locations of Essex and Chatham‐Kent counties in O ntario, C anada. Twenty‐one plant–host insect–host parasitoid associations were observed among T richoplusia ni ( H übner) ( L epidoptera: N octuidae), C . chalcites , and larval parasitoids in three trophic levels of interaction. C hrysodeixis chalcites , an old‐world species that had just arrived in the region, was the most common in our samples. The larval parasitoids C ampoletis sonorensis ( C ameron) ( H ymenoptera: I chneumonidae), C otesia vanessae ( R einhard), C otesia sp., M icroplitis alaskensis ( A shmead), and M eteorus rubens ( N ees) (all H ymenoptera: B raconidae) expanded their host range into C . chalcites changing the structure of the food web. C opidosoma floridanum ( A shmead) ( H ymenoptera: E ncyrtidae) was the most common parasitoid of T . ni that was not found in the invasive species. Plant species, host abundance, and agro‐ecosystem were the most common predictors for the presence of the parasitoids expanding their host range into C . chalcites . Our results indicate that C . sonorensis , C . vanessae , and C . floridanum should be evaluated for their potential use in biological control of C . chalcites and T . ni .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The crop food web contained twenty-one plant–host insect–parasitoid associations.

Outcome
plant–host insect–host parasitoid associationse0
Value
Twenty‐onee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Twenty‐one plant–host insect–host parasitoid associations were observed among T richoplusia ni ( H übner) ( L epidoptera: N octuidae), C . chalcites , and larval parasitoids in three trophic levels of interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–998 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysodeixis chalcites was the most common sampled host insect.

Interactor
C hrysodeixis chalcitese0pest
Outcome
most common in our samplese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“C hrysodeixis chalcites , an old‐world species that had just arrived in the region, was the most common in our samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five larval parasitoid taxa expanded their host range into C. chalcites, changing the food web.

Interactor
C . chalcitese0pest
Outcome
expanded their host rangee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The larval parasitoids C ampoletis sonorensis ( C ameron) ( H ymenoptera: I chneumonidae), C otesia vanessae ( R einhard), C otesia sp., M icroplitis alaskensis ( A shmead), and M eteorus rubens ( N ees) (all H ymenoptera: B raconidae) expanded their host range into C . chalcites changing the structure of the food web”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1439 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copidosoma floridanum was the most common parasitoid of T. ni and was absent from the invasive species.

Interactor
T . nie0pest
Outcome
most common parasitoid of T . nie0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“C opidosoma floridanum ( A shmead) ( H ymenoptera: E ncyrtidae) was the most common parasitoid of T . ni that was not found in the invasive species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1588 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant species, host abundance and agro-ecosystem were the most common predictors of host expanding parasitoid presence.

Taxon
Plant speciese0
Interactor
C . chalcitese0pest
Outcome
presence of the parasitoidse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Plant species, host abundance, and agro‐ecosystem were the most common predictors for the presence of the parasitoids expanding their host range into C . chalcites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1753 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend evaluating C. sonorensis, C. vanessae and C. floridanum for biological control of C. chalcites and T. ni.

Outcome
biological control of C . chalcites and T . nie0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“C . sonorensis , C . vanessae , and C . floridanum should be evaluated for their potential use in biological control of C . chalcites and T . ni”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1926 · show in text ↑