Paper · 2013 · University of Alberta Library

Grassland plant community assembly: The role of environmental heterogeneity, evolutionary history, competition, and pollination

Bennett, Jonathan A.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Plant community assembly is not a simple process; any factor that can affect the recruitment or coexistence of individuals can alter the outcome (e.g. nutrients, symbionts). In this thesis, I address a diverse subset of these potential factors, focusing on environmental variation, evolutionary history, competition, and pollination. I begin by testing whether evolutionary history constrains how species respond to 14 environmental factors. From this study, I conclude that evolutionary history has a weak effect on how species respond to changes in their environment, but that it can be important under certain circumstances. Next, I test whether competition is stronger when neighboring species are more related, which is hypothesized to leave a phylogenetic signature on plant communities if competition is important in community assembly. Competition did not increase with relatedness, potentially because competition was diffuse. As such, there was no measurable signature within the community. From these results, I expand existing theory to explore the conditions where competition should leave a phylogenetic signature. The importance of competition in community assembly is expected to increase or remain invariant with productivity, depending on the theory. I tested these ideas using a competition experiment with 22 species, but found competition declined with productivity, which is consistent with theories emphasizing resource supply and demand. Community assembly can also be dictated by recruitment, but few studies address how pollination, an important step in the recruitment process, varies across the community. I used a broad survey to examine whether pollination varied with environmental conditions and a manipulative experiment to test whether pollination can be predicted by abundance changes. Both flowering and flower visitation were highly dependent on environmental conditions and while they were correlated with abundance, they responded independently to environmental manipulations. This suggests that pollination and potentially seed production may become decoupled from abundance under a variety of conditions. Combined, my results suggest that many processes contribute to community assembly and that each of these processes is only important under certain conditions. More generally, my results cast doubt on the presence of general assembly rules that are applicable beyond the very smallest scales.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Evolutionary history weakly affected species responses to environmental change.

Taxon
Grassland plantt0
Outcome
how species respond to changes in their environmente0
Qualifier
under certain circumstancese0
Setting
environmente0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Grassland plant community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e0

“evolutionary history has a weak effect on how species respond to changes in their environment, but that it can be important under certain circumstances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–626 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition did not increase with relatedness.

Taxon
Grassland plantt0
Outcome
Competitione1
Direction
did not increasee1
Comparator
relatednesse1

Verbatim

t0

“Grassland plant community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e1

“Competition did not increase with relatedness, potentially because competition was diffuse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–934 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No measurable phylogenetic signature was found in the community.

Taxon
Grassland plantt0
Outcome
no measurable signature within the communitye2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Grassland plant community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e2

“there was no measurable signature within the community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–999 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition declined as productivity increased.

Taxon
Grassland plantt0
Outcome
competitione3
Direction
declinede3
Comparator
productivitye3

Verbatim

t0

“Grassland plant community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e3

“competition declined with productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1386 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering depended strongly on environmental conditions.

Taxon
Grassland plantt0
Outcome
floweringe4
Setting
environmental conditionse4

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Grassland plant community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e4

“Both flowering and flower visitation were highly dependent on environmental conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1821–1907 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower visitation depended strongly on environmental conditions.

Taxon
Grassland plantt0
Outcome
flower visitatione4
Setting
environmental conditionse4

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Grassland plant community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e4

“Both flowering and flower visitation were highly dependent on environmental conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1821–1907 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering and visitation correlated with abundance.

Taxon
Grassland plantt0
Outcome
flowering and flower visitatione4
Comparator
abundancee5

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Grassland plant community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e4

“Both flowering and flower visitation were highly dependent on environmental conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1821–1907 · show in text ↑
e5

“they were correlated with abundance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1918–1953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering and visitation responded independently to environmental manipulations.

Taxon
Grassland plantt0
Treatment
environmental manipulationse6
Outcome
flowering and flower visitatione4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Grassland plant community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e4

“Both flowering and flower visitation were highly dependent on environmental conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1821–1907 · show in text ↑
e6

“they responded independently to environmental manipulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1955–2014 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollination and possibly seed production may decouple from abundance.

Taxon
Grassland plantt0
Outcome
pollination and potentially seed productione7
Qualifier
under a variety of conditionse7
Comparator
abundancee7

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Grassland plant community”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
e7

“pollination and potentially seed production may become decoupled from abundance under a variety of conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2035–2144 · show in text ↑