Paper · 2018 · Sustainability

Impact of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) Practices on Cotton Production and Livelihood of Farmers in Punjab, Pakistan

Muhammad Ali Imran; Asghar Ali; Muhammad Ashfaq; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
223
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Cotton is the second largest crop of Pakistan in terms of area after wheat and is being suffered by multiple shocks over the time due to conventional agricultural management practices, climate change, and market failures. Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) was introduced by the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) in 2010, as an innovative cleaner production alternative to conventional farming that aimed at increasing the efficiency of natural resources, resilience, and productivity of agricultural production system, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The adverse effects of climate change on cotton production at the farm and regional level can be minimized by using CSA practices and technologies. The present study investigated the financial performance and explored the impact of CSA through sustainable water use management on cotton production in Lower Bari Doab Canal (LBDC) irrigation system of Punjab, Pakistan by using Cobb-Douglas production function. The adopters of CSA in cotton cultivation were identified by conducting six focus group discussions. Data were collected through well-structured questionnaire from 133 adopters of CSA and 65 conventional cotton growers for the cropping season 2016–2017. It was found that water-smart (raising crops on bed, laser land levelling, conjunctive use of water and drainage management), energy-smart (minimum tillage), carbon-smart (less use of chemicals) and knowledge-smart (crop rotation and improved varieties i.e., tolerant to drought, flood and heat/cold stresses) practices and technologies of CSA were adopted by the cotton farmers in the study area. Most of the farmers were of the view that they are adopting CSA practices and technologies due to the limited supply of canal water, climate change, drought-prone, massive groundwater extraction, rapidly declining groundwater table and increasing soil salinity over the time. Results revealed that uniform germination, higher yield and financial returns, the concentration of inputs and increase in resource use efficiency are the main advantages of CSA. The econometric analysis showed that implementation of CSA practices and technologies as judicious use of water and fertilizer, groundwater quality, access to extension services, and appropriate method and time of picking have a significant impact on the gross value of cotton product (GVP). The findings of the study would be helpful for policy makers to formulate policies that can minimize farmer’s financial burden to adopt CSA technologies and implement for scaling out in Punjab and beyond.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Practices and technologies of CSA were adopted by the cotton farmers.

Outcome
adopted by the cotton farmerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“practices and technologies of CSA were adopted by the cotton farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSA gave higher yield and financial returns in cotton.

Treatment
CSAe0
Outcome
higher yield and financial returnse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“uniform germination, higher yield and financial returns, the concentration of inputs and increase in resource use efficiency are the main advantages of CSA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1926–2081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSA gave uniform germination in cotton.

Treatment
CSAe0
Outcome
uniform germinatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“uniform germination, higher yield and financial returns, the concentration of inputs and increase in resource use efficiency are the main advantages of CSA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1926–2081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSA gave an increase in resource use efficiency in cotton.

Treatment
CSAe0
Outcome
increase in resource use efficiencye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“uniform germination, higher yield and financial returns, the concentration of inputs and increase in resource use efficiency are the main advantages of CSA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1926–2081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSA practices and technologies (judicious water and fertilizer use, groundwater quality, extension access, method and time of picking) had a significant impact on the gross value of cotton product.

Treatment
CSA practices and technologiese0
Outcome
gross value of cotton product (GVP)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“implementation of CSA practices and technologies as judicious use of water and fertilizer, groundwater quality, access to extension services, and appropriate method and time of picking have a significant impact on the gross value of cotton product (GVP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2120–2373 · show in text ↑

climate site · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

climate site · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 18 positive, 23 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.