Paper · 2018 · Advances in Crop Science and Technology

Yield and Yield Components of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as affected by N and P Fertilizer Rates at Jimma, Southwestern Ethiopia

Abdela Negash; Solomon Tulu; Essubalew Getachew

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Snap bean is one of the newly introduced legume crops in Ethiopia and it is an important crop in the provision of food security and earing forging currency. It responds much better to the application inorganic fertilizer especially N and P fertilizers due to lack of nodule forming bacteria in the soil and low in building of fertile soil. However, information concerning the production package of snap bean at Jimma was scares and due to this there is limited evidence in the response of snap bean to inorganic fertilizers (N and P fertilizers) which can increase yield and quality. Cognizant to this fact, the experiment was conducted to realize the effect N and P fertilizers rates on yield and yield components of snap bean at Jimma, Southwestern Ethiopia. The experiment consisted of two factors, five levels of N (0, 41, 82, 123, and 164 kg/ha) and four levels of P (0, 46, 92 and 138 kg/ha) arranged 5 × 4 in randomized complete block design with three replications. N as urea was applied in split application (50% at sowing and 50% at flowering) whereas the full dose of P was applied at sowing as triple super phosphate. There was a significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) for main effects of N and P fertilizer rates for all yield and yield component variables. Out of the whole variables tap root length were significant by the interaction effects of N and P fertilizers rate. The result showed that the maximum marketable pod yield was obtained from 123 kg/ha N and 92 kg/ha P2O5 fertilizer application rates. While, the minimum marketable pod yield was recorded from the application of 0 N and P fertilizer rate. So, form this experiment application of 123 kg/ha N and 92 kg/ha P2O5 increased the marketable pod yield of snap bean at Jimma. Since, the experiment was conducted in a single location and season. So, repeating the experiment for more seasons and similar location would help us draw sound conclusive recommendations to the end users.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum marketable pod yield of snap bean was obtained with 123 kg/ha N and 92 kg/ha P2O5 at Jimma.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
123 kg/ha N and 92 kg/ha P2O5 fertilizer application ratese2
Outcome
marketable pod yielde2
Direction
maximume2
Setting
Jimma, Southwestern Ethiopiae6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Snap bean is one of the newly introduced legume crops in Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e2

“The result showed that the maximum marketable pod yield was obtained from 123 kg/ha N and 92 kg/ha P2O5 fertilizer application rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1514 · show in text ↑
e6

“at Jimma, Southwestern Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The minimum marketable pod yield of snap bean was recorded with no N and P fertilizer.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
0 N and P fertilizer ratee3
Outcome
marketable pod yielde3
Direction
minimume3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Snap bean is one of the newly introduced legume crops in Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e3

“the minimum marketable pod yield was recorded from the application of 0 N and P fertilizer rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N and P fertilizer rates had significant main effects on all yield and yield component variables of snap bean.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
N and P fertilizer ratese4
Outcome
all yield and yield component variablese4
Value
P ≤ 0.05e4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Snap bean is one of the newly introduced legume crops in Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e4

“There was a significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) for main effects of N and P fertilizer rates for all yield and yield component variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tap root length of snap bean was significant under the interaction of N and P fertilizer rates.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
interaction effects of N and P fertilizers ratee5
Outcome
tap root lengthe5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Snap bean is one of the newly introduced legume crops in Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e5

“tap root length were significant by the interaction effects of N and P fertilizers rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1380 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · quality: postharvest · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.