Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management

Influence of Method and Application Time of Nitrogen on Pest Incidence of Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] Genotypes

Neelesh Raypuriya; R. K. Choudhary; P. Swathi; et al.

17
claims
37
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted under open field condition in the month of June to December in the year of 2013 at College of Agriculture, Indore, R.V.S.K.V.V. (M.P.), India. Nitrogen application time and cultivars were significantly effective but their interaction was non-significantly effective for incidence of insect pest (exception of ear head bug), whereas both factor and interaction were significantly effective to growth parameter. CSV20 was recorded with significantly lowest incidence of pests and maximum for growth parameters in comparison to CSH16 in nitrogen application time treatment N1: 50% at sowing+50% at 30 DAS maximum incidence of Shoot fly (57.87% and 64.39%) at 14 and 21 days, while minimum in stem borer dead hearts (41.15%) at 45 DAE, Ear head pests (3.75 bug & 3.0 worm) at milk stage, N2: 50% at sowing+25% at 30 DAS+25% at boot leaf stage was found highest height of plant (182.33 cm.), N3: 25% at sowing+50% at 30 DAS+25% at BLS has been recorded higher stem borer dead hearts (51.42%), N4: 25% at sowing+50% at 30 DAS+15% at BLS+10% at grain filling stage reported maximum ear head pests (6.78% and 4.27%), treatment N5: 25% at sowing+45% at 30 DAS+5% foliar spray at 45 DAS+15% BLS+10% GFS) recorded minimum incidence of shoot fly (43.85% and 51.12%). Among the treatment maximum number of grains ear head-1 was recorded in the treatment N4, (2369.33) at GFS and N5 (2111.17) at GFS with and higher yield plot-1 and stover yield was recorded in the treatment N5 (2.79 kg and 2.88 kg) respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application time significantly affected the incidence of insect pests in sorghum (except ear head bug).

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
Nitrogen application timee0
Outcome
incidence of insect peste0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrogen application time and cultivars were significantly effective but their interaction was non-significantly effective for incidence of insect pest (exception of ear head bug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum cultivars differed significantly in the incidence of insect pests (except ear head bug).

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
cultivarse0
Outcome
incidence of insect peste0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrogen application time and cultivars were significantly effective but their interaction was non-significantly effective for incidence of insect pest (exception of ear head bug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of nitrogen application time and cultivar was not significant for the incidence of insect pests (except ear head bug).

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
their interactione0
Outcome
incidence of insect peste0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nitrogen application time and cultivars were significantly effective but their interaction was non-significantly effective for incidence of insect pest (exception of ear head bug)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both nitrogen application time and cultivar and their interaction significantly affected sorghum growth parameters.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
both factor and interactione0
Outcome
growth parametere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“both factor and interaction were significantly effective to growth parameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar CSV20 had significantly lower pest incidence than CSH16.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
CSV20e0
Treatment
CSV20e0
Outcome
incidence of pestse0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
CSH16e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“CSV20 was recorded with significantly lowest incidence of pests and maximum for growth parameters in comparison to CSH16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar CSV20 had higher growth parameters than CSH16.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Material
CSV20e0
Treatment
CSV20e0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
CSH16e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“CSV20 was recorded with significantly lowest incidence of pests and maximum for growth parameters in comparison to CSH16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen schedule N1 (50% at sowing + 50% at 30 DAS) gave the maximum shoot fly incidence, 57.87% and 64.39% at 14 and 21 days.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
N1: 50% at sowing+50% at 30 DASe0
Interactor
Shoot flye0pest
Outcome
incidence of Shoot flye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
57.87% and 64.39%e0
Qualifier
at 14 and 21 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“N1: 50% at sowing+50% at 30 DAS maximum incidence of Shoot fly (57.87% and 64.39%) at 14 and 21 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen schedule N1 gave the minimum stem borer dead hearts, 41.15% at 45 DAE.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
N1: 50% at sowing+50% at 30 DASe0
Interactor
stem borere1pest
Outcome
stem borer dead heartse1
Direction
minimume1
Value
41.15%e1
Qualifier
at 45 DAEe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“N1: 50% at sowing+50% at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–629 · show in text ↑
e1

“minimum in stem borer dead hearts (41.15%) at 45 DAE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen schedule N1 gave low ear head pest numbers, 3.75 bugs and 3.0 worms at milk stage.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
N1: 50% at sowing+50% at 30 DASe0
Interactor
Ear head pestse1pest
Outcome
Ear head pestse1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
3.75 bug & 3.0 worme1
Qualifier
at milk stagee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“N1: 50% at sowing+50% at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–629 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ear head pests (3.75 bug & 3.0 worm) at milk stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen schedule N2 (50% at sowing + 25% at 30 DAS + 25% at boot leaf stage) gave the highest plant height, 182.33 cm.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
N2: 50% at sowing+25% at 30 DAS+25% at boot leaf stagee0
Outcome
height of plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
182.33 cm.e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“N2: 50% at sowing+25% at 30 DAS+25% at boot leaf stage was found highest height of plant (182.33 cm.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen schedule N3 (25% at sowing + 50% at 30 DAS + 25% at BLS) gave higher stem borer dead hearts, 51.42%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
N3: 25% at sowing+50% at 30 DAS+25% at BLSe0
Interactor
stem borere0pest
Outcome
stem borer dead heartse0
Direction
highere0
Value
51.42%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“N3: 25% at sowing+50% at 30 DAS+25% at BLS has been recorded higher stem borer dead hearts (51.42%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen schedule N4 (25% at sowing + 50% at 30 DAS + 15% at BLS + 10% at grain filling) gave maximum ear head pests, 6.78% and 4.27%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
N4: 25% at sowing+50% at 30 DAS+15% at BLS+10% at grain filling stagee0
Interactor
ear head pestse0pest
Outcome
ear head pestse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
6.78% and 4.27%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“N4: 25% at sowing+50% at 30 DAS+15% at BLS+10% at grain filling stage reported maximum ear head pests (6.78% and 4.27%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen schedule N5 (with 5% foliar spray at 45 DAS) gave the minimum shoot fly incidence, 43.85% and 51.12%.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
N5: 25% at sowing+45% at 30 DAS+5% foliar spray at 45 DAS+15% BLS+10% GFSe0
Interactor
shoot flye0pest
Outcome
incidence of shoot flye0
Direction
minimume0
Value
43.85% and 51.12%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“treatment N5: 25% at sowing+45% at 30 DAS+5% foliar spray at 45 DAS+15% BLS+10% GFS) recorded minimum incidence of shoot fly (43.85% and 51.12%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1281 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen schedule N4 gave the maximum number of grains per ear head, 2369.33 at grain filling stage.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
N4e0
Outcome
number of grains ear head-1e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2369.33e0
Qualifier
at GFSe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum number of grains ear head-1 was recorded in the treatment N4, (2369.33) at GFS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen schedule N5 also gave a high number of grains per ear head, 2111.17 at grain filling stage.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
N5e1
Outcome
number of grains ear head-1e0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2111.17e1
Qualifier
at GFSe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum number of grains ear head-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1338 · show in text ↑
e1

“N5 (2111.17) at GFS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen schedule N5 gave higher plot grain yield, 2.79 kg.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
N5e0
Outcome
yield plot-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.79 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher yield plot-1 and stover yield was recorded in the treatment N5 (2.79 kg and 2.88 kg) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen schedule N5 gave higher stover yield, 2.88 kg.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
N5e0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.88 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum bicolor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher yield plot-1 and stover yield was recorded in the treatment N5 (2.79 kg and 2.88 kg) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1527 · show in text ↑

application · disease · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.