Paper · 2018 · Journal of Hill Agriculture

Pathological survey of barley, maize, wheat crop grown in Ladakh region of Jammu and Kashmir, India

Anjali Ghai; Manisha Phour; Narendra Singh; et al.

12
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Barley, wheat and maize are the most important cereal crops in Ladakh. More than 200 fields of 16 different regions of Eastern Ladakh were surveyed to assess disease incidence and severity. In barley, Chumathang showed maximum disease incidence (34.67%) while disease severity was at its highest in Spangmik (18.08%) in contrast to which Hanley (Rango) showed minimum disease incidence (16.67%) and minimum disease severity (4.9%). In Nimmo, maximum disease incidence (62%) and maximum disease severity (42%), in maize, was recorded in contrast to Merak which showed 16% disease incidence and 6.67% disease severity. While surveying wheat crop, maximum disease incidence (29.57%) and maximum disease severity (12.11%) was observed in Durbuk as compared to Hanley (Khaldo) showing 12.46% disease incidence and 5.31% disease severity in Merak. The present study is carried to analyse the disease incidence and severity in important cereal crops in Ladakh region of India and could be used as baseline study for planning disease management strategy to protect cereal crops in Ladakh region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In barley, disease incidence was maximum at Chumathang (34.67%).

Outcome
disease incidencee1
Direction
maximume1
Value
34.67%e1
Setting
Chumathange1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In barley, Chumathang showed maximum disease incidence (34.67%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In barley, disease severity was highest at Spangmik (18.08%).

Outcome
disease severitye2
Direction
higheste2
Value
18.08%e2
Setting
Spangmike2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In barley, Chumathang showed maximum disease incidence (34.67%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–253 · show in text ↑
e2

“disease severity was at its highest in Spangmik (18.08%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–316 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In barley, disease incidence was minimum at Hanley (Rango) (16.67%).

Outcome
disease incidencee3
Direction
minimume3
Value
16.67%e3
Setting
Hanley (Rango)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In barley, Chumathang showed maximum disease incidence (34.67%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–253 · show in text ↑
e3

“Hanley (Rango) showed minimum disease incidence (16.67%) and minimum disease severity (4.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–430 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In barley, disease severity was minimum at Hanley (Rango) (4.9%).

Outcome
disease severitye3
Direction
minimume3
Value
4.9%e3
Setting
Hanley (Rango)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In barley, Chumathang showed maximum disease incidence (34.67%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–253 · show in text ↑
e3

“Hanley (Rango) showed minimum disease incidence (16.67%) and minimum disease severity (4.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–430 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In maize, disease incidence was maximum at Nimmo (62%).

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Outcome
disease incidencee4
Direction
maximume4
Value
62%e4
Setting
Nimmoe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In Nimmo, maximum disease incidence (62%) and maximum disease severity (42%), in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–518 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In maize, disease severity was maximum at Nimmo (42%).

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Outcome
disease severitye4
Direction
maximume4
Value
42%e4
Setting
Nimmoe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In Nimmo, maximum disease incidence (62%) and maximum disease severity (42%), in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–518 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In maize, disease incidence at Merak was 16%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Outcome
disease incidencee5
Value
16%e5
Setting
Merake5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In Nimmo, maximum disease incidence (62%) and maximum disease severity (42%), in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–518 · show in text ↑
e5

“Merak which showed 16% disease incidence and 6.67% disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–615 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In maize, disease severity at Merak was 6.67%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Outcome
disease severitye5
Value
6.67%e5
Setting
Merake5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In Nimmo, maximum disease incidence (62%) and maximum disease severity (42%), in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–518 · show in text ↑
e5

“Merak which showed 16% disease incidence and 6.67% disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–615 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat, disease incidence was maximum at Durbuk (29.57%).

Outcome
disease incidencee6
Direction
maximume6
Value
29.57%e6
Setting
Durbuke6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“While surveying wheat crop, maximum disease incidence (29.57%) and maximum disease severity (12.11%) was observed in Durbuk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–740 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat, disease severity was maximum at Durbuk (12.11%).

Outcome
disease severitye6
Direction
maximume6
Value
12.11%e6
Setting
Durbuke6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“While surveying wheat crop, maximum disease incidence (29.57%) and maximum disease severity (12.11%) was observed in Durbuk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–740 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat, disease incidence at Hanley (Khaldo) was 12.46%.

Outcome
disease incidencee7
Value
12.46%e7
Setting
Hanley (Khaldo)e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“While surveying wheat crop, maximum disease incidence (29.57%) and maximum disease severity (12.11%) was observed in Durbuk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–740 · show in text ↑
e7

“Hanley (Khaldo) showing 12.46% disease incidence and 5.31% disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–831 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat, disease severity at Hanley (Khaldo) was 5.31%.

Outcome
disease severitye7
Value
5.31%e7
Setting
Hanley (Khaldo)e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“While surveying wheat crop, maximum disease incidence (29.57%) and maximum disease severity (12.11%) was observed in Durbuk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–740 · show in text ↑
e7

“Hanley (Khaldo) showing 12.46% disease incidence and 5.31% disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–831 · show in text ↑