Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Evaluation of Different Establishment Methods for Enhancing Productivity and Profitability of Rice under Puddle Condition

M. Mali; M. Kumar; P.K. Salam; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment conducted during Kharif season of 2017 under AICRIP, in Alfisols at Instructional cum Research of Shaheed Gundadhoor College and Agricultural Research Station, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh, to study grain yield of rice as influenced by different establishment methods under puddle condition. Results indicated that highest grain yield (q ha-1) was registered under the treatment line transplanting method (T1) which was at par with treatment wet direct seeded rice using drum seeder (T3). The lowest grain yield (q ha-1) was recorded with treatment dry direct sowing method (T5).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line transplanting gave the highest rice grain yield.

Treatment
line transplanting method (T1)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest grain yield (q ha-1) was registered under the treatment line transplanting method (T1) which was at par with treatment wet direct seeded rice using drum seeder (T3).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wet direct seeding with a drum seeder gave grain yield at par with line transplanting.

Treatment
wet direct seeded rice using drum seeder (T3)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
line transplanting method (T1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest grain yield (q ha-1) was registered under the treatment line transplanting method (T1) which was at par with treatment wet direct seeded rice using drum seeder (T3).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry direct sowing gave the lowest rice grain yield.

Treatment
dry direct sowing method (T5)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest grain yield (q ha-1) was recorded with treatment dry direct sowing method (T5).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–98 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.