Paper · 2018 · Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture

Antifungal effect of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of neem leaves, stem bark and seeds on fungal rot diseases of yam and cocoyam

Chukwuma S. Ezeonu; Chinedu Imo; Dawn I. Agwaranze; et al.

12
claims
20
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fungal rot diseases of white yam (Discorea rotundata) tubers and cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta) are the major post-harvest challenges in the availability of these root tubers. The use of biological extract of plants will prevent post-harvest losses without any negative health challenge. Microwave-assisted method of extraction was used for both aqueous and ethanolic extracts of neem samples. Fungal-rotted yam and fungal-rotted cocoyam samples were collected, and fungi from them were cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA). The same medium was used for subculturing until pure fungal isolates were obtained. Pathogenicity tests were carried out on the yam and cocoyam tubers by inoculating with isolated fungi. The neem extracts were integrated into the PDA and their antifungal effects examined. From the yam, Aspergillus ochareus, Sclerotium rolfsii and Lasidiodiplodia theobromae were isolated, while Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae and Rhizopus stolonifer were isolated from cocoyam samples. After 14 days of inoculation, isolated fungi were shown to be highly pathogenic except R. stolonifer and A. ochareus, which showed moderate pathogenicity. All the plant extracts showed antifungal activities at varied percentage mean zones of inhibition. The inhibition against fungal growth from the isolates of the rotted cocoyam gave mean inhibition between 39.53 ± 8.39% and 96.76 ± 1.60%. Except for ethanolic stem bark extract which gave 39.53 ± 8.39% limited zone of inhibition against A. niger growth, the rest of the extract exhibited good zones of inhibition against cocoyam-isolated fungi ranging between 72.87 ± 3.55 and 96.79 ± 1.60%. On fungal isolates from yam, the mean percentage zones of inhibition of all extracts of the neem plant parts showed more effectiveness than the positive control (Ketoconazole) against L. theobromae growth. Aqueous stem bark extract with 93.80 ± 1.78% zone of inhibition showed comparable effectiveness to the control (100% inhibition) against A. ochareus growth, while against S. rolfii growth, there was good inhibition by all the extracts though not to the extent as that of the control. The fungitoxic potential of these plant extracts on rot-inducing fungi of stored yam and cocoyam suggests that the above extracts used in this study can be put to use by farmers as alternative to commercial/synthetic fungicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three fungi were isolated from rotted yam.

Taxon
yame0
Interactor
Aspergillus ochareuse0pathogen
Outcome
Aspergillus ochareus, Sclerotium rolfsii and Lasidiodiplodia theobromae were isolatede0

Verbatim

e0

“From the yam, Aspergillus ochareus, Sclerotium rolfsii and Lasidiodiplodia theobromae were isolated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–898 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three fungi were isolated from rotted cocoyam.

Interactor
Aspergillus nigerAspergillus nigere0pathogen
Outcome
Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae and Rhizopus stolonifer were isolatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus niger · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Y tambe assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae and Rhizopus stolonifer were isolated from cocoyam samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1002 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. stolonifer showed moderate pathogenicity on tubers.

Interactor
R. stoloniferRhizopus stolonifere0pathogen
Outcome
R. stolonifer and A. ochareus, which showed moderate pathogenicitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizopus stolonifer
Rhizopus stolonifer · InteractorW.A. Djatmiko ( Wie146 ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isolated fungi were shown to be highly pathogenic except R. stolonifer and A. ochareus, which showed moderate pathogenicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“cocoyam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–129 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. ochareus showed moderate pathogenicity on tubers.

Taxon
yamt0
Interactor
A. ochareuse0pathogen
Outcome
A. ochareus, which showed moderate pathogenicitye0

Verbatim

e0

“R. stolonifer and A. ochareus, which showed moderate pathogenicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“of yam and cocoyam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–129 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All neem extracts showed varying antifungal activity.

Taxon
yam and cocoyamt0
Outcome
antifungal activities at varied percentage mean zones of inhibitione0

Verbatim

e0

“All the plant extracts showed antifungal activities at varied percentage mean zones of inhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“yam and cocoyam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–129 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibition of cocoyam rot isolates ranged from 39.53 ± 8.39% to 96.76 ± 1.60%.

Outcome
inhibition against fungal growth from the isolates of the rotted cocoyame0
Value
39.53 ± 8.39% and 96.76 ± 1.60%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibition against fungal growth from the isolates of the rotted cocoyam gave mean inhibition between 39.53 ± 8.39% and 96.76 ± 1.60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanolic stem bark extract had 39.53 ± 8.39% inhibition against A. niger.

Treatment
ethanolic stem bark extracte0
Interactor
A. nigerAspergillus nigere0pathogen
Outcome
inhibition against A. niger growthe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
39.53 ± 8.39%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aspergillus niger
Aspergillus niger · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Y tambe assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethanolic stem bark extract which gave 39.53 ± 8.39% limited zone of inhibition against A. niger growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“cocoyam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other neem extracts inhibited cocoyam fungi by 72.87 ± 3.55 to 96.79 ± 1.60%.

Treatment
the rest of the extracte0
Outcome
zones of inhibition against cocoyam-isolated fungie0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
72.87 ± 3.55 and 96.79 ± 1.60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rest of the extract exhibited good zones of inhibition against cocoyam-isolated fungi ranging between 72.87 ± 3.55 and 96.79 ± 1.60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem extracts inhibited L. theobromae more than ketoconazole.

Taxon
yamt0
Treatment
all extracts of the neem plant partse0
Interactor
L. theobromaee0pathogen
Outcome
L. theobromae growthe0
Direction
more effectivenesse0
Comparator
Ketoconazolee0

Verbatim

e0

“all extracts of the neem plant parts showed more effectiveness than the positive control (Ketoconazole) against L. theobromae growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1855 · show in text ↑
t0

“of yam and cocoyam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous stem bark extract gave 93.80 ± 1.78% inhibition against A. ochareus, comparable with control.

Taxon
yamt0
Treatment
Aqueous stem bark extracte0
Interactor
A. ochareuse0pathogen
Outcome
zone of inhibitione0
Direction
comparable effectivenesse0
Value
93.80 ± 1.78%e0
Qualifier
100% inhibitione0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Aqueous stem bark extract with 93.80 ± 1.78% zone of inhibition showed comparable effectiveness to the control (100% inhibition) against A. ochareus growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1857–2012 · show in text ↑
t0

“of yam and cocoyam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All extracts inhibited S. rolfii, less than the control.

Taxon
yamt0
Treatment
all the extractse0
Interactor
S. rolfiie0pathogen
Outcome
S. rolfii growthe0
Direction
good inhibitione0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“against S. rolfii growth, there was good inhibition by all the extracts though not to the extent as that of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2020–2139 · show in text ↑
t0

“of yam and cocoyam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–129 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest neem extracts as alternatives to synthetic fungicides for stored yam and cocoyam.

Taxon
yam and cocoyamt0
Outcome
alternative to commercial/synthetic fungicidese0

Verbatim

e0

“the above extracts used in this study can be put to use by farmers as alternative to commercial/synthetic fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2252–2368 · show in text ↑
t0

“yam and cocoyam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–129 · show in text ↑

botanical · disease · Colocasia esculenta (taro)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

botanical · Aspergillus niger · Colocasia esculenta (taro)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · growth · DioscoreaResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · disease · DioscoreaResults agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.