Paper · 2018 · European Scientific Journal ESJ

Diversité Floristique Et Structurale De Deux Forêts Communautaires Sous Exploitation Au Cameroun: Cas De Kompia Et Nkolenyeng

Kengne Olivier Clovis; Zapfack Louis; Garcia Claude; et al.

15
claims
15
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The attribution of community forests to local populations has emerged as a new participative management system of plant biodiversity in Cameroon. Further to the intensification of anthropogenic activities in these forests, the logging impact on this biodiversity remains poorly known. This study was conducted in two different community forests located in the Kompia and Nkolenyeng villages, respectively. It aims to provide information on the state of the flora and plant structure of the community forests subjected to logging activities. Floristic inventories were carried out in nine biotope types using the variable-area sampling method. A total of 2772 individuals with dbh ≥ 10 cm were recorded in the community forests. In the whole biotopes, the species richness ranges from 19 to 98 species, the Shannon diversity index from 3.63 to 5.99 and the Pielou evenness from 0.65 to 0.93. The density of trees ranges from 73 ± 27 to 661 ± 119 stems ha-1 , the basal area from 15.68 ± 13.14 to 70.05 ± 28.76 m² ha-1 , the mean diameter of 18.85 ± 4.80 to 57.39 ± 20.70 cm and the canopy height from 12.26 ± 1.22 to 25.18 ± 1.02 m, on the average between biotopes. The two community forests showed decrease in tree density, a proliferation of the pioneer species, increase of small-diameter light-demanding species, a scarcity of large-diameter trees, and lowering of canopy height. These changes could compromise the sustainable management of these forests and their ability to ensure long-term local development. The large number of useful species identified in the two community forests is a reason to reinforce the preservation and management measures of the plant biodiversity of these forest areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A total of 2772 individuals with dbh of at least 10 cm were recorded in the two community forests.

Outcome
individuals with dbh ≥ 10 cme0
Value
2772e0
Setting
community forestse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“A total of 2772 individuals with dbh ≥ 10 cm were recorded in the community forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–726 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across biotopes, species richness ranged from 19 to 98 species.

Outcome
species richnesse0
Value
19 to 98 speciese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the species richness ranges from 19 to 98 species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across biotopes, the Shannon diversity index ranged from 3.63 to 5.99.

Outcome
Shannon diversity indexe0
Value
3.63 to 5.99e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the Shannon diversity index from 3.63 to 5.99”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–847 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree density ranged from 73 ± 27 to 661 ± 119 stems per hectare across biotopes.

Taxon
treese0
Outcome
density of treese0
Value
73 ± 27 to 661 ± 119 stems ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The density of trees ranges from 73 ± 27 to 661 ± 119 stems ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–955 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal area ranged from 15.68 ± 13.14 to 70.05 ± 28.76 m² per hectare across biotopes.

Outcome
basal areae0
Value
15.68 ± 13.14 to 70.05 ± 28.76 m² ha-1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the basal area from 15.68 ± 13.14 to 70.05 ± 28.76 m² ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1016 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean diameter ranged from 18.85 ± 4.80 to 57.39 ± 20.70 cm across biotopes.

Outcome
mean diametere0
Value
18.85 ± 4.80 to 57.39 ± 20.70 cme0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the mean diameter of 18.85 ± 4.80 to 57.39 ± 20.70 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1072 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy height ranged from 12.26 ± 1.22 to 25.18 ± 1.02 m across biotopes.

Outcome
canopy heighte0
Value
12.26 ± 1.22 to 25.18 ± 1.02 me0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the canopy height from 12.26 ± 1.22 to 25.18 ± 1.02 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two community forests showed an increase of small-diameter light-demanding species.

Outcome
small-diameter light-demanding speciese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“increase of small-diameter light-demanding species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1314 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A large number of useful species was identified in the two community forests.

Outcome
useful speciese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The large number of useful species identified in the two community forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1589 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the useful species present are a reason to reinforce preservation and management measures for plant biodiversity of the forests.

Taxon
plante0
Outcome
preservation and management measurese0

Verbatim

e0

“a reason to reinforce the preservation and management measures of the plant biodiversity of these forest areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1703 · show in text ↑