Paper · 2018 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Induced Tomato Plant Resistance Against Tetranychus urticae Triggered by the Phytophagy of Nesidiocoris tenuis

Meritxell Pérez-Hedo; Ángela M. Arias-Sanguino; Alberto Urbaneja

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

TThe zoophytophagous predator Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) (Hemiptera: Miridae) is capable of inducing plant defenses in tomato due to its phytophagous behavior. These induced defenses, which include the release of herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs), have been proven to affect the oviposition behavior and reduce the subsequent performance of some tomato pests. However, the effect of induction of plant defenses by N. tenuis on the preference, development and reproduction of the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae) remains unknown. In this research, T. urticae did not show preference for the odor source emitted by intact tomato plants when compared with N. tenuis-punctured plants and jasmonic acid deficient mutant tomato plants. Furthermore, the number of eggs laid by T. urticae on intact tomato plants or on N. tenuis-punctured plants was similar. However, in a greenhouse experiment conducted to evaluate whether the defense induction mediated by N. tenuis had an effect on T. urticae the infestation of T. urticae was significantly reduced by 35% on those plants previously activated by N. tenuis when compared to the control. The expression of a JA-responsive gene that was upregulated and the transcription of the plant protein inhibitor II was higher on activated plants relative to the control. These results can serve as a basis for the development of new management strategies for T. urticae based on plant defense mechanisms induced from the phytophagous behavior of N. tenuis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tetranychus urticae showed no preference for the odour of intact tomato plants compared with N. tenuis-punctured and jasmonic acid deficient plants.

Interactor
T. urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Second interactor
N. tenuisNesidiocoris tenuise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
preference for the odor sourcee0
Comparator
N. tenuis-punctured plants and jasmonic acid deficient mutant tomato plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nesidiocoris tenuis
Nesidiocoris tenuis · Second interactorGüney Baloğlu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T. urticae did not show preference for the odor source emitted by intact tomato plants when compared with N. tenuis-punctured plants and jasmonic acid deficient mutant tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of T. urticae eggs laid on N. tenuis-punctured tomato plants was similar to that on intact plants.

Treatment
N. tenuis-punctured plantse1
Interactor
T. urticaeTetranychus urticaee1pest
Outcome
number of eggs laid by T. urticaee1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
intact tomato plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Furthermore, the number of eggs laid by T. urticae on intact tomato plants or on N. tenuis-punctured plants was similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato plants previously activated by N. tenuis significantly reduced T. urticae infestation by 35% in the greenhouse compared with the control.

Treatment
previously activated by N. tenuise2
Interactor
T. urticaeTetranychus urticaee2pest
Second interactor
N. tenuisNesidiocoris tenuise2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
infestation of T. urticaee2
Direction
significantly reducede2
Value
35%e2
Comparator
the controle2
Setting
greenhousee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nesidiocoris tenuis
Nesidiocoris tenuis · Second interactorGüney Baloğlu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“However, in a greenhouse experiment conducted to evaluate whether the defense induction mediated by N. tenuis had an effect on T. urticae the infestation of T. urticae was significantly reduced by 35% on those plants previously activated by N. tenuis when compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“Induced Tomato Plant Resistance Against Tetranychus urticae Triggered by the Phytophagy of Nesidiocoris tenuis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato plants activated by N. tenuis showed upregulated expression of a JA-responsive gene relative to the control.

Treatment
previously activated by N. tenuise2
Interactor
N. tenuisNesidiocoris tenuise2biocontrol_agent
Gene
JA-responsive genee3
Outcome
expressione3
Direction
upregulatede3
Comparator
the controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nesidiocoris tenuis
Nesidiocoris tenuis · InteractorGüney Baloğlu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The expression of a JA-responsive gene that was upregulated and the transcription of the plant protein inhibitor II was higher on activated plants relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1351 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, in a greenhouse experiment conducted to evaluate whether the defense induction mediated by N. tenuis had an effect on T. urticae the infestation of T. urticae was significantly reduced by 35% on those plants previously activated by N. tenuis when compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“Induced Tomato Plant Resistance Against Tetranychus urticae Triggered by the Phytophagy of Nesidiocoris tenuis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato plants activated by N. tenuis showed higher transcription of plant protein inhibitor II relative to the control.

Treatment
previously activated by N. tenuise2
Interactor
N. tenuisNesidiocoris tenuise2biocontrol_agent
Gene
plant protein inhibitor IIe3
Outcome
transcription of the plant protein inhibitor IIe3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
the controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nesidiocoris tenuis
Nesidiocoris tenuis · InteractorGüney Baloğlu · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The expression of a JA-responsive gene that was upregulated and the transcription of the plant protein inhibitor II was higher on activated plants relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1351 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, in a greenhouse experiment conducted to evaluate whether the defense induction mediated by N. tenuis had an effect on T. urticae the infestation of T. urticae was significantly reduced by 35% on those plants previously activated by N. tenuis when compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“Induced Tomato Plant Resistance Against Tetranychus urticae Triggered by the Phytophagy of Nesidiocoris tenuis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑

Nesidiocoris tenuis · molecular: expression · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.