Paper · 2018 · Genetika

Stability analysis of bread wheat landraces and lines using biometrical genetic models

Fatemeh Bavandpori; Jafar Ahmadi; Sayyed Hossaini

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In order to evaluate yield stability of twenty genotypes of bread wheat, an experiment was conducted in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications under irrigated and rainfed conditions in Razi University of Kermanshah for three years (2011-2013). Combined analysis of variance showed highly significant differences for the GEI. Stability determined by AMMI analysis indicated that the first two AMMI model (AMMI1-AMMI2) were highly significant (P<0.01). The GEI was three times higher than that of the genotype effect. The results of Biplot AMMI2 showed that, genotypes WC-47359, WC-47472, WC-4611, WC-47388 and WC-47403 had general adaptability. Based on the ASV and GSI, the genotypes number WC-47403 and WC-47472 revealed the highest stability. GGE biplot analysis of yield displaying main effect G and GEI justified 57.5 percent of the total variation. The first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) were used to create a 2-dimensional GGE biplot and explained 34.3, 23.2 of GGE sum of squares (SS), respectively. Genotypes WC-47403, PISHGAM2 exhibited the highest mean yield and stability. Based on the results obtained the best genotypes were WC-47403, PISHGAM2, WC-4968, WC-47472 and WC-47528 for breeding programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype-by-environment interaction differences were highly significant among bread wheat genotypes.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
differences for the GEIe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Stability analysis of bread wheat landraces and lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combined analysis of variance showed highly significant differences for the GEI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–348 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GEI variance was three times higher than the genotype effect.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
GEIe2
Direction
highere2
Value
three timese2
Comparator
genotype effecte2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Stability analysis of bread wheat landraces and lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e2

“The GEI was three times higher than that of the genotype effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–539 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The first two AMMI models (AMMI1-AMMI2) were highly significant (P<0.01).

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
first two AMMI model (AMMI1-AMMI2)e3
Value
P<0.01e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Stability analysis of bread wheat landraces and lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e3

“Stability determined by AMMI analysis indicated that the first two AMMI model (AMMI1-AMMI2) were highly significant (P<0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–474 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes WC-47359, WC-47472 and WC-4611 had general adaptability in the Biplot AMMI2 analysis.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
WC-47359, WC-47472, WC-4611e4
Outcome
general adaptabilitye4
Qualifier
Biplot AMMI2e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Stability analysis of bread wheat landraces and lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e4

“The results of Biplot AMMI2 showed that, genotypes WC-47359, WC-47472, WC-4611, WC-47388 and WC-47403 had general adaptability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–667 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes WC-47388 and WC-47403 had general adaptability in the Biplot AMMI2 analysis.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
WC-47388 and WC-47403e4
Outcome
general adaptabilitye4
Qualifier
Biplot AMMI2e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Stability analysis of bread wheat landraces and lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e4

“The results of Biplot AMMI2 showed that, genotypes WC-47359, WC-47472, WC-4611, WC-47388 and WC-47403 had general adaptability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–667 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes WC-47403 and WC-47472 showed the highest stability based on ASV and GSI.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
WC-47403 and WC-47472e5
Outcome
stabilitye5
Direction
higheste5
Qualifier
Based on the ASV and GSIe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Stability analysis of bread wheat landraces and lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e5

“Based on the ASV and GSI, the genotypes number WC-47403 and WC-47472 revealed the highest stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–768 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GGE biplot analysis of yield explained 57.5 percent of the total variation.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
total variatione6
Value
57.5 percente6
Qualifier
main effect G and GEIe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Stability analysis of bread wheat landraces and lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e6

“GGE biplot analysis of yield displaying main effect G and GEI justified 57.5 percent of the total variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PC1 of the GGE biplot explained 34.3 of the GGE sum of squares.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
GGE sum of squares (SS)e7
Value
34.3e7
Qualifier
PC1e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Stability analysis of bread wheat landraces and lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e7

“The first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) were used to create a 2-dimensional GGE biplot and explained 34.3, 23.2 of GGE sum of squares (SS), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1040 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PC2 of the GGE biplot explained 23.2 of the GGE sum of squares.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
GGE sum of squares (SS)e7
Value
23.2e7
Qualifier
PC2e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Stability analysis of bread wheat landraces and lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e7

“The first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) were used to create a 2-dimensional GGE biplot and explained 34.3, 23.2 of GGE sum of squares (SS), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1040 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes WC-47403 and PISHGAM2 had the highest mean yield and stability.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
WC-47403, PISHGAM2e7
Outcome
mean yield and stabilitye7
Direction
higheste7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Stability analysis of bread wheat landraces and lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e7

“Genotypes WC-47403, PISHGAM2 exhibited the highest mean yield and stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1117 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The best genotypes WC-47403, PISHGAM2, WC-4968, WC-47472 and WC-47528 are recommended for breeding programs.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
WC-47403, PISHGAM2, WC-4968, WC-47472 and WC-47528e7
Outcome
best genotypese7
Qualifier
for breeding programse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Stability analysis of bread wheat landraces and lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e7

“Based on the results obtained the best genotypes were WC-47403, PISHGAM2, WC-4968, WC-47472 and WC-47528 for breeding programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1245 · show in text ↑