Abstract
The study was conducted in 2017 main cropping season at two locations in North Gondar Zone, Ethiopia, to determine the optimum inter- and intra-row spacing of mung bean for maximum yield and yield components. The experiment was laid in a randomized complete block design with three replications in a factorial arrangement of four inter-row (20, 30, 40 and 50 cm) and three intra-row (5, 10 and 15 cm) spacing using mung bean variety Rasa (N-26). Significant interaction effect of inter- and intra-row spacing was observed for days to maturity, number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, grain yield, harvest index, days to flowering, plant height and aboveground dry biomass yield. The highest grain yield (1882.67 kg ha−1) was obtained at interaction of 40 × 10 cm spacing, while the lowest (1367.8 kg ha−1) was obtained from 20 × 5 cm spacing. However, the result of economic analysis showed that the maximum net benefit was obtained at spacing of 40 × 15 cm. Based on agronomic performance and economic analysis, use of 40 × 15 cm is promising for mung bean production in Metema District and similar agroecologies.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
The highest grain yield of mung bean was obtained at 40 × 10 cm spacing
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- 40 × 10 cm spacinge1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 1882.67 kg ha−1e1
- Setting
- North Gondar Zone, Ethiopiae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”
e0“The study was conducted in 2017 main cropping season at two locations in North Gondar Zone, Ethiopia”
e1“The highest grain yield (1882.67 kg ha−1) was obtained at interaction of 40 × 10 cm spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
The lowest grain yield of mung bean was obtained at 20 × 5 cm spacing
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- 20 × 5 cm spacinge2
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- loweste2
- Value
- 1367.8 kg ha−1e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”
e1“The highest grain yield (1882.67 kg ha−1) was obtained at interaction of 40 × 10 cm spacing”
e2“while the lowest (1367.8 kg ha−1) was obtained from 20 × 5 cm spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
The maximum net benefit of mung bean was obtained at 40 × 15 cm spacing
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- spacing of 40 × 15 cme3
- Outcome
- net benefite3
- Direction
- maximume3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”
e3“the maximum net benefit was obtained at spacing of 40 × 15 cm”
Claim · model-written summary
Use of 40 × 15 cm spacing is promising for mung bean production in Metema District and similar agroecologies
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Outcome
- use of 40 × 15 cme4
- Setting
- Metema Districte4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”
e4“Based on agronomic performance and economic analysis, use of 40 × 15 cm is promising for mung bean production in Metema District”
Claim · model-written summary
Spacing had a significant interaction effect on days to maturity, number of branches per plant and number of pods per plant
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- inter- and intra-row spacinge5
- Outcome
- days to maturity, number of branches per plant, number of pods per plante5
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”
e5“Significant interaction effect of inter- and intra-row spacing was observed for days to maturity, number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, grain yield, harvest index, days to flowering, plant height and aboveground dry biomass yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Spacing had a significant interaction effect on harvest index, days to flowering and plant height
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- inter- and intra-row spacinge5
- Outcome
- harvest index, days to flowering, plant heighte5
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”
e5“Significant interaction effect of inter- and intra-row spacing was observed for days to maturity, number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, grain yield, harvest index, days to flowering, plant height and aboveground dry biomass yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Spacing had a significant interaction effect on aboveground dry biomass yield
- Taxon
- mung bean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- inter- and intra-row spacinge5
- Outcome
- aboveground dry biomass yielde5
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)”
e5“Significant interaction effect of inter- and intra-row spacing was observed for days to maturity, number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, grain yield, harvest index, days to flowering, plant height and aboveground dry biomass yield”
The same questions in other papers
density · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.