Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Pest Management

Geographic distribution of false smut disease of rice in India and efficacy of selected fungicides for its management

Ladhalakshmi Duraisamy; Srinivas Prasad Madamsetty; Prakasam Vellaichamy; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

False smut disease of rice caused by the fungus Ustilaginoidea virens, has become a serious production constraint in various rice-growing regions of India. Analysis of rice false smut disease survey data of last 24 years revealed significant changes in the intensity of the disease in various rice-growing regions of India over the years. We evaluated three fungicide formulations viz., trifloxystrobin-tebuconazole (TT) combination (0.04%), kresoxim methyl (KM) (0.1%) and propiconazole (PC) (0.1%) for their effectiveness against false smut disease of rice. Under in vitro condition, TT and PC completely inhibited the fungal growth while KM inhibited the growth by 80%. We evaluated the efficacy of these chemicals in a multi-location trial in 3 hot spot locations, consecutively for three years. A single fungicide spray was given in 3 different crop stages (booting, 50% panicle emergence and 100% panicle emergence). The results indicated that all the treatments significantly reduced the percentage of both infected panicles and spikelets in all the three locations. Both TT and PC were most effective in reducing the disease intensity and increasing the yield when applied either in booting or in 50% panicle emergence stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

False smut intensity changed significantly across rice growing regions of India over 24 years.

Outcome
intensity of the diseasee0
Direction
changese0
Setting
Indiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Analysis of rice false smut disease survey data of last 24 years revealed significant changes in the intensity of the disease in various rice-growing regions of India over the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TT completely inhibited fungal growth in vitro.

Treatment
TTe0
Outcome
fungal growthe0
Direction
completely inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under in vitro condition, TT and PC completely inhibited the fungal growth while KM inhibited the growth by 80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“false smut disease of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PC completely inhibited fungal growth in vitro.

Treatment
PCe0
Outcome
fungal growthe0
Direction
completely inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under in vitro condition, TT and PC completely inhibited the fungal growth while KM inhibited the growth by 80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“false smut disease of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KM inhibited fungal growth by 80% in vitro.

Treatment
KMe0
Outcome
fungal growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under in vitro condition, TT and PC completely inhibited the fungal growth while KM inhibited the growth by 80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“false smut disease of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All fungicide treatments significantly reduced infected rice panicles and spikelets at three locations.

Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Outcome
percentage of both infected panicles and spikeletse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the treatments significantly reduced the percentage of both infected panicles and spikelets in all the three locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“false smut disease of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TT at booting or half panicle emergence reduced false smut intensity most effectively.

Organ / stage
booting or in 50% panicle emergence stagee0
Treatment
TTe0
Outcome
disease intensitye0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both TT and PC were most effective in reducing the disease intensity and increasing the yield when applied either in booting or in 50% panicle emergence stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“false smut disease of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PC at booting or half panicle emergence reduced false smut intensity most effectively.

Treatment
PCe0
Outcome
disease intensitye0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both TT and PC were most effective in reducing the disease intensity and increasing the yield when applied either in booting or in 50% panicle emergence stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“false smut disease of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TT at booting or half panicle emergence most effectively increased rice yield.

Treatment
TTe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both TT and PC were most effective in reducing the disease intensity and increasing the yield when applied either in booting or in 50% panicle emergence stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“false smut disease of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PC at booting or half panicle emergence most effectively increased rice yield.

Treatment
PCe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both TT and PC were most effective in reducing the disease intensity and increasing the yield when applied either in booting or in 50% panicle emergence stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“false smut disease of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–53 · show in text ↑

kresoxim-methyl · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

propiconazole · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

propiconazole · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

31 papers: 31 positive, 0 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.