Paper · 1980 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Sorghum-pigeonpea intercropping and the effects of plant population density

M. Natarajan; R. W. Willey

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
61
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary An intercropping experiment is described in which three plant population densities of an early sorghum (82 days) were factorially combined with three plant population densities of a later-maturing pigeonpea (173 days) in a standard 2 sorghum:1 pigeonpea row arrangement. Sorghum growth was not affected by the presence of pigeonpea, and the farmers' primary objective of maintaining a ‘full’ sorghum yield was achieved if the density of the intercropped sorghum was equivalent to the sole crop optimum. The spatial distribution of roots after 30 and 60 days of growth did not appear to be altered by intercropping, and roots of the two crops were found to intermingle freely.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum growth was not affected by the presence of intercropped pigeonpea.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume0
Treatment
presence of pigeonpeae0
Outcome
Sorghum growthe0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum growth was not affected by the presence of pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–339 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A full sorghum yield was maintained if the density of the intercropped sorghum equalled the sole crop optimum.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
density of the intercropped sorghume0
Outcome
sorghum yielde0
Direction
equivalente0
Comparator
sole crop optimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maintaining a ‘full’ sorghum yield was achieved if the density of the intercropped sorghum was equivalent to the sole crop optimum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The spatial distribution of roots after 30 and 60 days did not appear to be altered by intercropping.

Taxon
Sorghum-pigeonpeat0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
spatial distribution of rootse0
Direction
not appear to be alterede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum-pigeonpea intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e0

“The spatial distribution of roots after 30 and 60 days of growth did not appear to be altered by intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–621 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots of the two intercropped crops intermingled freely.

Taxon
Sorghum-pigeonpeat0
Outcome
roots of the two crops were found to intermingle freelye0

Verbatim

t0

“Sorghum-pigeonpea intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
e0

“roots of the two crops were found to intermingle freely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–682 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · SorghumResults differ

165 papers: 118 positive, 47 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.