Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Evaluation of Crop Diversification and Intensification in Rice and Maize Based Cropping Sequences in Central Plain Zone of Uttar Pradesh

Rentapalli Balaji; Karam Husain; Uma Shankar Tiwari

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

An experiment was executed with ten crop sequences during 2010-17 at C.S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh under All India Coordinating Research Project on Cropping Systems. All these sequences were evaluated for yield, economics, profitability and to identify the remunerative cropping sequence among rice and maize based cropping sequences. Results revealed that Hyb. Rice-Wheat and Maize-Mustard-Onion cropping sequences were most economically efficient among rice and maize based cropping sequences respectively. Hyb. Rice-Wheat fetched highest B: C ratio of 3.24 followed by Maize-Mustard-Onion (3.21) while lowest B: C ratio (1.86) was recorded by Maize + Green gram-Potato-Wheat. Highest crop profitability (Rs.774.79 /ha/day) and system profitability (Rs.1075.28 /ha/day) were recorded by Maize + Black gram-Potato-Onion cropping sequence followed by Maize + Garlic-Green gram (G+R) (Rs. 758.34 /ha/day and Rs. 890.04 /ha/day, respectively).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hyb. Rice-Wheat was the most economically efficient rice-based cropping sequence.

Treatment
Hyb. Rice-Wheate1
Outcome
economically efficiente1
Direction
most economically efficiente1
Comparator
rice and maize based cropping sequencese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Hyb. Rice-Wheat and Maize-Mustard-Onion cropping sequences were most economically efficient among rice and maize based cropping sequences respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Maize Based Cropping Sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize-Mustard-Onion was the most economically efficient maize-based cropping sequence.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Maize-Mustard-Onione1
Outcome
economically efficiente1
Direction
most economically efficiente1
Comparator
rice and maize based cropping sequencese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Hyb. Rice-Wheat and Maize-Mustard-Onion cropping sequences were most economically efficient among rice and maize based cropping sequences respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Maize Based Cropping Sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hyb. Rice-Wheat fetched the highest B:C ratio of 3.24.

Treatment
Hyb. Rice-Wheate2
Outcome
B: C ratioe2
Direction
higheste2
Value
3.24e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Hyb. Rice-Wheat fetched highest B: C ratio of 3.24 followed by Maize-Mustard-Onion (3.21)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Maize Based Cropping Sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize-Mustard-Onion had a B:C ratio of 3.21, lower than Hyb. Rice-Wheat.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Maize-Mustard-Onione2
Outcome
B: C ratioe2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
3.21e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Hyb. Rice-Wheat fetched highest B: C ratio of 3.24 followed by Maize-Mustard-Onion (3.21)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Maize Based Cropping Sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize + Green gram-Potato-Wheat had the lowest B:C ratio, 1.86.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Maize + Green gram-Potato-Wheate3
Outcome
B: C ratioe3
Direction
loweste3
Value
1.86e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“lowest B: C ratio (1.86) was recorded by Maize + Green gram-Potato-Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Maize Based Cropping Sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize + Black gram-Potato-Onion had the highest crop profitability, Rs.774.79 /ha/day.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Maize + Black gram-Potato-Onione4
Outcome
crop profitabilitye4
Direction
Higheste4
Value
Rs.774.79 /ha/daye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Highest crop profitability (Rs.774.79 /ha/day) and system profitability (Rs.1075.28 /ha/day) were recorded by Maize + Black gram-Potato-Onion cropping sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Maize Based Cropping Sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize + Black gram-Potato-Onion had the highest system profitability, Rs.1075.28 /ha/day.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Maize + Black gram-Potato-Onione4
Outcome
system profitabilitye4
Direction
Higheste4
Value
Rs.1075.28 /ha/daye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Highest crop profitability (Rs.774.79 /ha/day) and system profitability (Rs.1075.28 /ha/day) were recorded by Maize + Black gram-Potato-Onion cropping sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Maize Based Cropping Sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize + Garlic-Green gram had crop profitability of Rs. 758.34 /ha/day, below the top sequence.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Maize + Garlic-Green gram (G+R)e5
Outcome
crop profitabilitye4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
Rs. 758.34 /ha/daye5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Highest crop profitability (Rs.774.79 /ha/day) and system profitability (Rs.1075.28 /ha/day) were recorded by Maize + Black gram-Potato-Onion cropping sequence followed by Maize + Garlic-Green gram (G+R) (Rs. 758.34 /ha/day and Rs. 890.04 /ha/day, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–984 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maize + Garlic-Green gram (G+R) (Rs. 758.34 /ha/day and Rs. 890.04 /ha/day, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Maize Based Cropping Sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize + Garlic-Green gram had system profitability of Rs. 890.04 /ha/day, below the top sequence.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Maize + Garlic-Green gram (G+R)e5
Outcome
system profitabilitye4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
Rs. 890.04 /ha/daye5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Highest crop profitability (Rs.774.79 /ha/day) and system profitability (Rs.1075.28 /ha/day) were recorded by Maize + Black gram-Potato-Onion cropping sequence followed by Maize + Garlic-Green gram (G+R) (Rs. 758.34 /ha/day and Rs. 890.04 /ha/day, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–984 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maize + Garlic-Green gram (G+R) (Rs. 758.34 /ha/day and Rs. 890.04 /ha/day, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice and Maize Based Cropping Sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–97 · show in text ↑

Vigna radiata var. radiata · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.