Abstract
Frontline demonstrations resulted in a yield of 80.83 q ha-1 with 14.01 per cent increase over farmer’s practice of 70.90 q ha-1which was much more than the district average yield of 47.33 q ha-1and increased net returns of Rs. 18,106 per hectare (53.16 %) over farmers practice. During the study period extension gap of 9.93 q ha-1 was found to be more than technology gap of 6.17 q ha-1 which emphasized the need to educate the farmers through various means for the adoption of this resource conservation technology for improved maize production with reduced cost of cultivation. Technology index of 18.51 per cent, indices of realized potential yield of 81.49 per cent and potential farm yield of 87.71 per cent had shown the feasibility of the demonstrated technology at the farmers’ fields.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Demonstration yield was 80.83 q ha-1, 14.01 per cent above farmer practice.
- Treatment
- Frontline demonstrationse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 80.83 q ha-1e0
- Qualifier
- 70.90 q ha-1e0
- Comparator
- farmer’s practicee0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Frontline demonstrations resulted in a yield of 80.83 q ha-1 with 14.01 per cent increase over farmer’s practice of 70.90 q ha-1”
t0“Zero Tillage Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Demonstration net returns increased by Rs. 18,106 per hectare over farmer practice.
- Treatment
- Zero Tillaget0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- Rs. 18,106 per hectaree0
- Qualifier
- 53.16 %e0
- Comparator
- farmers practicee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increased net returns of Rs. 18,106 per hectare (53.16 %) over farmers practice”
t0“Zero Tillage Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
The extension gap of 9.93 q ha-1 exceeded the technology gap of 6.17 q ha-1.
- Outcome
- extension gape0
- Direction
- more thane0
- Value
- 9.93 q ha-1e0
- Qualifier
- 6.17 q ha-1e0
- Comparator
- technology gape0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“extension gap of 9.93 q ha-1 was found to be more than technology gap of 6.17 q ha-1”
t0“Zero Tillage Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
The technology index was 18.51 per cent.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Technology index of 18.51 per cent”
t0“Zero Tillage Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
The realized potential yield index was 81.49 per cent.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“indices of realized potential yield of 81.49 per cent”
t0“Zero Tillage Maize”
Claim · model-written summary
The potential farm yield index was 87.71 per cent.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“potential farm yield of 87.71 per cent”
t0“Zero Tillage Maize”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.