Paper · 2018 · VEGETABLE CROPS OF RUSSIA

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROTECTIVE MEASURES FROM THE DISEASE OF CARROTS

I. A. Vanyushkina; N. P. Kushnareva; Y. G. Mikheev

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

In 2016, 2017 studies on the influence of fungicides on the development of diseases on the leaf surface of carrots were carried out. To study were taken fungicides Akanto Plus, Signum, fast and Rex duo. The research was carried out on the varieties of carrots of the Primorskyaya 22 and Taiphun. The work was carried out at the seaside vegetable Experimental Station – branch of the federal State budget scientific institution "Federal Scientific Center of vegetable growing" in coastal zone of Primorsky Krai in conditions of monsoon climate with annual quantity Precipitation 700-800 mm, most of which falls on the summer period. Natural climatic factors of Primorsky Krai create the most favorable conditions for development of high infectious background of pathogenic flora. The leaves of carrots here are amazed fitopatogenami from childbirth Alternaria, Cercospora, Xanthomonas. Diseases appear in the sowing of carrots usually in the second half of the growing season, after clamping tops in rows. The first treatment of drugs was carried out at the appearance of the first signs of disease on the leaf surface of the carrot, two subsequent treatments-in 14-16 days, depending on weather conditions. The most biological efficacy after three treatment showed the fungicide Signum: 53.2% on the variety of Primorskyaya 22 and 54.3% on the grade Taiphun, which contributed to the highest yield of carrots in this variant. The increase in the yield of standard root crops was here 10.0 t/ha or 41.0% on the grade of the Primorskyaya 22 and 7.6 t/ha or 28.4% on the grade Taiphun compared to the control version.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Signum had 53.2% biological efficacy on Primorskyaya 22 after three treatments.

Taxon
CARROTSDaucus carotat0
Material
Primorskyaya 22e0
Treatment
fungicide Signume0
Outcome
biological efficacye0
Direction
moste0
Value
53.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most biological efficacy after three treatment showed the fungicide Signum: 53.2% on the variety of Primorskyaya 22”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“CARROTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Signum had 54.3% biological efficacy on Taiphun after three treatments.

Taxon
CARROTSDaucus carotat0
Material
Taiphune0
Treatment
fungicide Signume0
Outcome
biological efficacye0
Direction
moste0
Value
54.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most biological efficacy after three treatment showed the fungicide Signum: 53.2% on the variety of Primorskyaya 22 and 54.3% on the grade Taiphun”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1357 · show in text ↑
t0

“CARROTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Signum increased standard carrot root yield by 10.0 t/ha or 41.0% in Primorskyaya 22 versus control.

Taxon
CARROTSDaucus carotat0
Material
Primorskyaya 22e0
Treatment
fungicide Signume1
Outcome
yield of standard root cropse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
10.0 t/ha or 41.0%e0
Comparator
control versione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in the yield of standard root crops was here 10.0 t/ha or 41.0% on the grade of the Primorskyaya 22 and 7.6 t/ha or 28.4% on the grade Taiphun compared to the control version.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1614 · show in text ↑
e1

“fungicide Signum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“CARROTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Signum increased standard carrot root yield by 7.6 t/ha or 28.4% in Taiphun versus control.

Taxon
CARROTSDaucus carotat0
Material
Taiphune0
Treatment
fungicide Signume1
Outcome
yield of standard root cropse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
7.6 t/ha or 28.4%e0
Comparator
control versione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in the yield of standard root crops was here 10.0 t/ha or 41.0% on the grade of the Primorskyaya 22 and 7.6 t/ha or 28.4% on the grade Taiphun compared to the control version.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1614 · show in text ↑
e1

“fungicide Signum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“CARROTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–68 · show in text ↑

fungicide · control · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fungicide · yield · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.