Paper · 2018 · Environmental Entomology

The Effects of Pest-Resistant Amaranth Accessions on the Performance of the Solitary EndoparasitoidApanteles hemara(Hymenoptera: Braconidae) Against the Amaranth Leaf-WebberSpoladea recurvalis(Lepidoptera: Crambidae)

Stephen T O Othim; Srinivasan Ramasamy; Ruth Kahuthia-Gathu; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The leaf-webber Spoladea recurvalis F. is the most devastating pest of amaranths in East Africa. Recent collaborative research in Asia and East Africa revealed one highly resistant amaranth accession (VI036227) to the pest and seven moderately resistant ones (RVI00053, VI033479, VI044437-A, VI047555-B, VI048076, VI049698, and VI056563). The solitary koinobiontic endoparasitoid Apanteles hemara Nixon has also been reported as efficient against the pest. Plant resistance to herbivores may have bottom-up effects on their parasitoids. In this study, we assessed the effects of the seven moderately resistant amaranth accessions and one susceptible accession (VI033482) on the performance of A. hemara. Except VI056563 that recorded lower parasitism rates compared to the susceptible accession, A. hemara performed well on all the other moderately resistant accessions. The longevity of the parasitoid was significantly extended on the resistant accessions compared to the susceptible one. While the parasitoid's body size, developmental time, and survival differed significantly between resistant accessions, they were similar to results obtained on the susceptible accession. Furthermore, while the parasitoid's sex ratio was male-biased in the susceptible accession, balanced sex ratios were obtained from accessions RVI00053, VI033479, VI044437-A, VI047555-B, VI048076, and VI049698. Significant nonreproductive host larval mortality was induced by A. hemara on all the tested accessions. These results suggest that the moderately resistant accessions can be used in combination with the endoparasitoid A. hemara to manage S. recurvalis and other amaranth leaf-webbers in the context of integrated pest management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VI056563 had lower parasitoid parasitism than the susceptible accession.

Material
VI056563e0
Interactor
A. hemaraApanteles hemarae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
parasitism ratese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
susceptible accessione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Except VI056563 that recorded lower parasitism rates compared to the susceptible accession, A. hemara performed well on all the other moderately resistant accessions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pest-Resistant Amaranth Accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. hemara performed well on the other moderately resistant amaranth accessions.

Material
moderately resistant accessionse0
Interactor
A. hemaraApanteles hemarae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
performed welle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. hemara performed well on all the other moderately resistant accessions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pest-Resistant Amaranth Accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant accessions significantly extended parasitoid longevity versus the susceptible accession.

Material
resistant accessionse0
Interactor
Apanteles hemaraApanteles hemarat0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
longevity of the parasitoide0
Direction
extendede0
Comparator
susceptible onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The longevity of the parasitoid was significantly extended on the resistant accessions compared to the susceptible one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–990 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amaranth Accessions on the Performance of the Solitary EndoparasitoidApanteles hemara”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitoid body size, development time and survival differed among resistant accessions but resembled the susceptible accession.

Material
resistant accessionse0
Interactor
Apanteles hemaraApanteles hemarat0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
body size, developmental time, and survivale0
Direction
differede0
Comparator
susceptible accessione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the parasitoid's body size, developmental time, and survival differed significantly between resistant accessions, they were similar to results obtained on the susceptible accession.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amaranth Accessions on the Performance of the Solitary EndoparasitoidApanteles hemara”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitoid sex ratio was male-biased on the susceptible accession.

Material
susceptible accessione0
Interactor
Apanteles hemaraApanteles hemarat0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
sex ratio was male-biasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the parasitoid's sex ratio was male-biased in the susceptible accession”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amaranth Accessions on the Performance of the Solitary EndoparasitoidApanteles hemara”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six moderately resistant accessions produced balanced parasitoid sex ratios.

Material
accessions RVI00053, VI033479, VI044437-A, VI047555-B, VI048076, and VI049698e0
Interactor
Apanteles hemaraApanteles hemarat0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
balanced sex ratiose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“balanced sex ratios were obtained from accessions RVI00053, VI033479, VI044437-A, VI047555-B, VI048076, and VI049698.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amaranth Accessions on the Performance of the Solitary EndoparasitoidApanteles hemara”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–115 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A. hemara induced significant nonreproductive host larval mortality across all tested accessions.

Material
tested accessionse0
Interactor
A. hemaraApanteles hemarae0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Spoladea recurvalisSpoladea recurvalist0pest
Outcome
nonreproductive host larval mortalitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spoladea recurvalis
Spoladea recurvalis · Second interactorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant nonreproductive host larval mortality was induced by A. hemara on all the tested accessions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1493 · show in text ↑
t0

“Amaranth Leaf-WebberSpoladea recurvalis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–192 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest combining moderately resistant accessions with A. hemara to manage S. recurvalis and other amaranth leaf-webbers.

Material
moderately resistant accessionse0
Interactor
S. recurvalisSpoladea recurvalise0pest
Second interactor
A. hemaraApanteles hemarae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
manage S. recurvalis and other amaranth leaf-webberse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spoladea recurvalis
Spoladea recurvalis · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the moderately resistant accessions can be used in combination with the endoparasitoid A. hemara to manage S. recurvalis and other amaranth leaf-webbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1673 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pest-Resistant Amaranth Accessions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑