Paper · 2018 · Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources

Technical efficiency of hybrid maize production in eastern terai of Nepal: A stochastic frontier approach

Surya P. Adhikari; Krishna P. Timsina; Peter R. Brown; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
17
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Maize is the second most important crop after rice in terms of area and production in Nepal. This article analyzes the technical efficiency and its determinants of hybrid maize production in eastern Nepal. Using a randomly selected data from 98 farmers (41 from Morang and 57 from Sunsari) in eastern Nepal, the study employed a stochastic frontier production model to find the production elasticity coefficients of inputs, determinants of efficiency and technical efficiency of hybrid maize farmers. The results showed that maize production responds positively to increase in amount of urea, DAP and the area planted, where as it is negative to seed quantity. The study indicate that farmers are not technically efficient with a mean technical efficiency 79 %. Socioeconomic variable age had a negative and significant while the household size had a positive and significant related to maize output. The younger farmers were observed more technically efficient than older farmers. Larger the members in the household higher the maize production. It is recommended that farmers should increase their fertilizer dose and farm size while they should decrease their seed rate for efficient production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Maize output responded positively to urea.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
maize productione0
Direction
positivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize production responds positively to increase in amount of urea, DAP and the area planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–617 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Maize output responded positively to DAP.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
DAPe0
Outcome
maize productione0
Direction
positivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize production responds positively to increase in amount of urea, DAP and the area planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–617 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Maize output increased with planted area.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
area plantede0
Outcome
maize productione0
Direction
positivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize production responds positively to increase in amount of urea, DAP and the area planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–617 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Maize production responded negatively to seed quantity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
seed quantitye0
Outcome
maize productione1
Direction
negativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“where as it is negative to seed quantity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–659 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize production responds positively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–561 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Mean technical efficiency of maize farmers was 79 %.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
mean technical efficiencye0
Value
79 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers are not technically efficient with a mean technical efficiency 79 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–760 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid maize farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–499 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Farmer age was negatively associated with maize output.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
maize outpute0
Direction
negativee0
Qualifier
agee0
Setting
eastern Nepale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“age had a negative and significant while the household size had a positive and significant related to maize output”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–899 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid maize production in eastern Nepal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–204 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Household size was positively associated with maize output.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
maize outpute0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
household sizee0
Setting
eastern Nepale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“household size had a positive and significant related to maize output”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–899 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid maize production in eastern Nepal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–204 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Younger farmers were more technically efficient than older farmers.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
technically efficiente0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
older farmerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The younger farmers were observed more technically efficient than older farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–980 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid maize farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–499 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers should raise fertilizer dose and farm size and lower seed rate.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
increase their fertilizer dose and farm size while they should decrease their seed ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers should increase their fertilizer dose and farm size while they should decrease their seed rate for efficient production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1197 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid maize farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–499 · show in text ↑