Abstract
To improve yield and cup quality, mature coffee tree as rootstock could be grafted with scion of selected genotype. This research aimed to study growth performance of mature trees resulted from intra and inter-specific grafting on Robusta coffee. The research was arranged in Randomized Complete Block Design with 3 replications. There were 12 treatments of entrees/under-stump genotype for coffee grafting including 8 treatments of intraspecific local Robusta/Robusta grafting and 4 treatments of interspecific coffee grafting of Robusta/Liberica and Arabica/Robusta. The results showed that intraspecific grafting of Robusta/Robusta, Robusta/Liberica, and Arabica/Robusta resulted in grafting mortality of 9.8%, 10.9%, and 24.8%, respectively. Until 28 weeks after grafting, branch growth variables were significantly affected by scion/rootstock of Robusta/Robusta, Robusta/Liberica, and Arabica/Robusta grafting. Grafted Arabica/Robusta coffee showed the poor growth performance. In second year of Robusta/Robusta and Robusta/Liberica growth, generative growth of cherry inflorescence per branch and number of cherries per inflorescence were not affected by scion and rootstock genotypes. Leaf and branch growth were very important variables correlating with other variables.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Robusta/Robusta grafting had 9.8% mortality.
- Taxon
- Robusta Coffee
Coffea canephorat0 - Material
- Robusta/Robustae0
- Outcome
- grafting mortalitye0
- Value
- 9.8%e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Robusta/Robusta, Robusta/Liberica, and Arabica/Robusta resulted in grafting mortality of 9.8%, 10.9%, and 24.8%, respectively”
t0“Robusta Coffee”
Claim · model-written summary
Robusta/Liberica grafting had 10.9% mortality.
- Taxon
- Robusta CoffeeCoffea canephorat0
- Material
- Robusta/Libericae0
- Outcome
- grafting mortalitye0
- Value
- 10.9%e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Robusta/Robusta, Robusta/Liberica, and Arabica/Robusta resulted in grafting mortality of 9.8%, 10.9%, and 24.8%, respectively”
t0“Robusta Coffee”
Claim · model-written summary
Arabica/Robusta grafting had 24.8% mortality.
- Taxon
- Robusta CoffeeCoffea canephorat0
- Material
- Arabica/Robustae0
- Outcome
- grafting mortalitye0
- Value
- 24.8%e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Robusta/Robusta, Robusta/Liberica, and Arabica/Robusta resulted in grafting mortality of 9.8%, 10.9%, and 24.8%, respectively”
t0“Robusta Coffee”
Claim · model-written summary
Scion/rootstock combinations significantly affected branch growth through 28 weeks.
- Taxon
- Robusta CoffeeCoffea canephorat0
- Material
- scion/rootstocke0
- Outcome
- branch growth variablese0
- Qualifier
- Until 28 weeks after graftinge0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Until 28 weeks after grafting, branch growth variables were significantly affected by scion/rootstock of Robusta/Robusta, Robusta/Liberica, and Arabica/Robusta grafting”
t0“Robusta Coffee”
Claim · model-written summary
Grafted Arabica/Robusta coffee had poor growth performance.
CoffeaOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grafted Arabica/Robusta coffee showed the poor growth performance”
Claim · model-written summary
Scion and rootstock genotypes did not affect cherry inflorescences per branch in year two.
- Taxon
- Robusta CoffeeCoffea canephorat0
- Material
- scion and rootstock genotypese0
- Outcome
- cherry inflorescence per branche0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In second year of Robusta/Robusta and Robusta/Liberica growth, generative growth of cherry inflorescence per branch and number of cherries per inflorescence were not affected by scion and rootstock genotypes”
t0“Robusta Coffee”
Claim · model-written summary
Scion and rootstock genotypes did not affect cherries per inflorescence in year two.
- Taxon
- Robusta CoffeeCoffea canephorat0
- Material
- scion and rootstock genotypese0
- Outcome
- number of cherries per inflorescencee0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In second year of Robusta/Robusta and Robusta/Liberica growth, generative growth of cherry inflorescence per branch and number of cherries per inflorescence were not affected by scion and rootstock genotypes”
t0“Robusta Coffee”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf and branch growth correlated with other growth variables.
- Taxon
- Robusta CoffeeCoffea canephorat0
- Outcome
- Leaf and branch growthe0
- Comparator
- other variablese0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Leaf and branch growth were very important variables correlating with other variables”
t0“Robusta Coffee”