Paper · 2019 · The American Midland Naturalist

Witness Tree Records for the Early Colonial Period (1623-1700) of Eastern Virginia

Marc D. Abrams; Sarah E. Johnson

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The composition and dominance of 1256 witness (land survey) trees were compiled for the early Colonial era (pre-1700) in two locations in eastern Virginia, a region where studies of such information are lacking. The study locations are the Marine Corps Base Quantico and the Cheatham Annex Naval Supply Center, both along major rivers of Tidewater Virginia. At Quantico, a total of 754 witness trees comprising 22 species were recorded. Oak (Quercus) species made up 67% of these trees, followed by hickory (Carya; 15%), poplar (Liriodendron), gum (Nyssa), and pine (Pinus) each representing 4% of the forest composition. At Cheatham Annex a total of 502 witness trees from 24 species were recorded. Oaks made up 57% of the total composition followed by hickory (13%), pine (10%), poplar (5%), and gum (5%). There was a dearth of late successional, fire sensitive species at both locations, despite the presence of many mesic locations that should support such species. This suggests Native American activity (e.g., burning and land clearing) was an important factor affecting forests in eastern Virginia. This research provides a better understanding of the original forests of eastern Virginia and can serve as a baseline for making comparisons with present day forests to assess forest change since the Colonial era.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quantico records contained 754 witness trees from 22 species.

Taxon
witness treese0
Outcome
witness trees comprising 22 speciese0
Value
754 witness treese0
Setting
Quanticoe0

Verbatim

e0

“At Quantico, a total of 754 witness trees comprising 22 species were recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–435 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oaks comprised 67% of Quantico witness trees.

Taxon
Oak (Quercus)Quercuse0
Outcome
made up 67% of these treese0
Value
67%e0
Setting
Quanticoe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus
Quercus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)WikiVagant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oak (Quercus) species made up 67% of these trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–485 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Quantico”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–369 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hickory comprised 15% of Quantico witness trees.

Taxon
hickorye0
Outcome
hickory (Carya; 15%)e0
Value
15%e0
Setting
Quanticoe1

Verbatim

e0

“hickory (Carya; 15%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–519 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Quantico”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–369 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poplar, gum and pine each represented 4% of Quantico forest composition.

Taxon
poplar (Liriodendron), gum (Nyssa), and pine (Pinus)PinusLiriodendronNyssae0
Outcome
forest compositione0
Value
4%e0
Setting
Quanticoe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus
Pinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest Service Northern Region from Missoula, MT, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Liriodendron
Liriodendron · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bruce Marlin · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nyssa
Nyssa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Charles T. Bryson, USDA Agricultural Research Service · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“poplar (Liriodendron), gum (Nyssa), and pine (Pinus) each representing 4% of the forest composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–620 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Quantico”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–369 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cheatham Annex records contained 502 witness trees from 24 species.

Taxon
witness treese0
Outcome
witness trees from 24 speciese0
Value
502 witness treese0
Setting
Cheatham Annexe0

Verbatim

e0

“At Cheatham Annex a total of 502 witness trees from 24 species were recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–698 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oaks comprised 57% of Cheatham Annex trees.

Taxon
OaksQuercuse0
Outcome
total compositione0
Value
57%e0
Setting
Cheatham Annexe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus
Quercus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)WikiVagant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oaks made up 57% of the total composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–741 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Cheatham Annex a total of 502 witness trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–668 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hickory comprised 13% of Cheatham Annex trees.

Taxon
hickorye0
Outcome
hickory (13%)e0
Value
13%e0
Setting
Cheatham Annexe1

Verbatim

e0

“hickory (13%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–767 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Cheatham Annex a total of 502 witness trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–668 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pine comprised 10% of Cheatham Annex trees.

Taxon
pinePinuse0
Outcome
pine (10%)e0
Value
10%e0
Setting
Cheatham Annexe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus
Pinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest Service Northern Region from Missoula, MT, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pine (10%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–779 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Cheatham Annex a total of 502 witness trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–668 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poplar and gum each comprised 5% of Cheatham Annex trees.

Taxon
poplar (5%), and gume0
Outcome
poplar (5%), and gum (5%)e0
Value
5%e0
Setting
Cheatham Annexe1

Verbatim

e0

“poplar (5%), and gum (5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–806 · show in text ↑
e1

“At Cheatham Annex a total of 502 witness trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–668 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late successional fire-sensitive species were scarce at both sites.

Taxon
late successional, fire sensitive speciese0
Outcome
dearth of late successional, fire sensitive speciese0
Setting
both locationse0

Verbatim

e0

“There was a dearth of late successional, fire sensitive species at both locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–889 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Native American burning and clearing was suggested to have affected eastern Virginia forests.

Taxon
forestse0
Outcome
affecting forestse0
Qualifier
Native American activity (e.g., burning and land clearing)e0
Setting
eastern Virginiae0

Verbatim

e0

“This suggests Native American activity (e.g., burning and land clearing) was an important factor affecting forests in eastern Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1104 · show in text ↑