Paper · 2017 · OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries)

Heterosis and Combining Ability for Yield and Fiber Qualities of Upland Cotton Under High Density Planting Conditions for India

Vishal Madhukar Saitwal

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

India is the leading producer of cotton in the world producing 33.8 million bales (170 kg each) from 11.5 million ha. However, the lower yields per unit area stimulated the concept of high density planting system in India. India grows Gossypium hirsutum (upland cotton) hybrids with Bt transgenic technology over 90% of the total hectareage. Current genotypes require a long growing season and the non-synchronous maturity demands multiple cycles of hand harvest. Breeding programs are working aggressively on product development suitable for high density planting. Identification of phenotypes that can be planted at higher densities, compact phenology, and improved agronomics will help India achieve an average yield of 766 kg ha^-1, which is the global average for upland cotton. This study was conducted to compare level of heterosis and combining ability of compact and synchronous maturity US upland cotton cultivars when grown in US and India. Findings from this study should help Indian breeders to identify promising US cultivars for use in their breeding programs to transform the current robust, long duration genotypes to compact and synchronous maturity suitable for high density planting. Of the thirty three diverse upland cotton cultivars from US used for line x tester study, significantly high best parent heterosis was observed in F1 hybrids for yield (72.1% in US and 136.7% at India) and yield contributing traits. For fiber qualities medium to high heterosis was observed. Select US upland cotton cultivars were observed to be good general combiners for yield and quality traits. Tamcot 73 had good GCA for seed cotton yield both at US (805 kg ha-^1) and India (259 kg ha^-1). For fiber length UA48 and TAM 94L-25 combined well at US and India while UA48 and Acala 1717-99 had significant GCA for fiber strength. To reduce the plant height TAM 73840 and TAM 0155 can be used since they had negative GCA both at India and US locations. The line x tester results indicated preponderance of additive gene action over non additive for all the traits since variance due to line x tester interaction was less than variance to lines or testers. The results suggest that careful selection of US cultivars and utilizing them to transform current Indian upland cotton genotypes suitable for high density planting is possible. Secondly, reasonably high heterosis observed for yield and other agronomic traits indicates that compact x compact F1 hybrids can be bred without losing yield. Lastly pure line breeding scheme is recommended for improving fiber quality traits considering preponderance of additive gene action observed in this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 hybrids showed best parent heterosis for yield of 72.1% in the US.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Material
F1 hybridse0
Outcome
best parent heterosise0
Direction
highe0
Value
72.1%e0
Setting
USe0

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly high best parent heterosis was observed in F1 hybrids for yield (72.1% in US and 136.7% at India)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1405 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 hybrids showed best parent heterosis for yield of 136.7% in India.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Material
F1 hybridse0
Outcome
best parent heterosise0
Direction
highe0
Value
136.7%e0
Setting
Indiae0

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly high best parent heterosis was observed in F1 hybrids for yield (72.1% in US and 136.7% at India)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1405 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F1 hybrids showed significant high heterosis for yield contributing traits.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Material
F1 hybridse0
Outcome
yield contributing traitse0
Direction
highe0

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly high best parent heterosis was observed in F1 hybrids for yield (72.1% in US and 136.7% at India) and yield contributing traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1435 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber qualities showed medium to high heterosis.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Outcome
fiber qualitiese0
Direction
medium to highe0

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“For fiber qualities medium to high heterosis was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1494 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Selected US cultivars were good general combiners for yield and quality traits.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Material
US upland cotton cultivarse0
Outcome
good general combiners for yield and quality traitse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Select US upland cotton cultivars were observed to be good general combiners for yield and quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1601 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tamcot 73 had good general combining ability for seed cotton yield in the US, at 805 kg ha-^1.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Material
Tamcot 73e0
Outcome
GCA for seed cotton yielde0
Direction
goode0
Value
805 kg ha-^1e0
Setting
USe0

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tamcot 73 had good GCA for seed cotton yield both at US (805 kg ha-^1) and India (259 kg ha^-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1698 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tamcot 73 had good general combining ability for seed cotton yield in India, at 259 kg ha^-1.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Material
Tamcot 73e0
Outcome
GCA for seed cotton yielde0
Direction
goode0
Value
259 kg ha^-1e0
Setting
Indiae0

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tamcot 73 had good GCA for seed cotton yield both at US (805 kg ha-^1) and India (259 kg ha^-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1698 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UA48 combined well for fiber length in the US and India.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Material
UA48e0
Outcome
fiber lengthe0
Direction
welle0
Setting
US and Indiae0

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“For fiber length UA48 and TAM 94L-25 combined well at US and India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1766 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 94L-25 combined well for fiber length in the US and India.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Material
TAM 94L-25e0
Outcome
fiber lengthe0
Direction
welle0
Setting
US and Indiae0

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“For fiber length UA48 and TAM 94L-25 combined well at US and India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1766 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UA48 had significant general combining ability for fiber strength.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Material
UA48e0
Outcome
GCA for fiber strengthe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“UA48 and Acala 1717-99 had significant GCA for fiber strength”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1773–1834 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acala 1717-99 had significant general combining ability for fiber strength.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Material
Acala 1717-99e0
Outcome
GCA for fiber strengthe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“UA48 and Acala 1717-99 had significant GCA for fiber strength”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1773–1834 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 73840 had negative general combining ability for plant height in India and the US.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Material
TAM 73840e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
negativee0
Setting
India and USe0

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“To reduce the plant height TAM 73840 and TAM 0155 can be used since they had negative GCA both at India and US locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1956 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 0155 had negative general combining ability for plant height in India and the US.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Material
TAM 0155e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
negativee0
Setting
India and USe0

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“To reduce the plant height TAM 73840 and TAM 0155 can be used since they had negative GCA both at India and US locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1956 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line by tester analysis indicated additive gene action predominated for all traits.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Outcome
additive gene actione0
Direction
preponderancee0
Qualifier
variance due to line x tester interaction was less than variance to lines or testerse0

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“preponderance of additive gene action over non additive for all the traits since variance due to line x tester interaction was less than variance to lines or testers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1994–2159 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude compact by compact F1 hybrids can be bred without losing yield.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Outcome
compact x compact F1 hybrids can be bred without losing yielde0

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“compact x compact F1 hybrids can be bred without losing yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2436–2497 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend careful selection of US cultivars for transforming Indian genotypes for high density planting.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Outcome
careful selection of US cultivars and utilizing them to transform current Indian upland cotton genotypes suitable for high density plantinge0

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“careful selection of US cultivars and utilizing them to transform current Indian upland cotton genotypes suitable for high density planting is possible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2186–2337 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend pure line breeding to improve fiber quality traits.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Outcome
pure line breeding scheme is recommended for improving fiber quality traitse0

Verbatim

t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“pure line breeding scheme is recommended for improving fiber quality traits considering preponderance of additive gene action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2506–2631 · show in text ↑