Paper · 2019 · AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science

Phenotypic Evaluation and Genetic Profiling of Shallot Genotypes Adapted to Peatland of South Kalimantan Using Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Markers

Reflinur Reflinur; Tri Handayani; Iteu M. Hidayat; et al.

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The escalating demand of shallot has forced the increase of domestic production, including through extension of harvest area by utilization of arable land on peatland. This study was aimed to analyze genetic profile of shallot adapted in peatland areas using SSR markers. Twenty-one shallot genotypes were tested in the field and eighteen primers dispersed throughout the genome was applied to analyze genetic diversity of the peatland-adapted shallots. Phenotypic evaluation revealed that shallot yield potential ranged from 6.66 to 14.21 t/ha. Of these, seven shallot clones (11 NA, 1111 TA, 12 NA, 12 NC, 20 NA and 22 N) had good yield potential and comparable with those of five released shallot varieties. Nine out of 12 shallot clones were moderately resistant to A lternaria porii . Clustering analysis showed that shallot genotypes were clustered into two main groups, Clustered I and II which consisted of 13 and 8 genotypes, respectively. The closest genetic relatedness was observed between 8NC and 8NA (0.85), while the farthest ones was between 11NA and Kramat2 (0.51). This result implies that cross combination between 11NA and Kramat2 is valuable and suitable for breeding programs aimed at improving shallot potential yield in the future.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallot yield potential ranged from 6.66 to 14.21 t/ha.

Outcome
yield potentiale0
Value
6.66 to 14.21 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shallot yield potential ranged from 6.66 to 14.21 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–545 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven shallot clones had yield potential comparable with five released varieties.

Material
seven shallot clonese0
Outcome
yield potentiale0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
five released shallot varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seven shallot clones (11 NA, 1111 TA, 12 NA, 12 NC, 20 NA and 22 N) had good yield potential and comparable with those of five released shallot varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–710 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nine of twelve shallot clones were moderately resistant to Alternaria porii.

Material
shallot clonese0
Interactor
A lternaria poriie0pathogen
Outcome
moderately resistante0
Value
Nine out of 12e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nine out of 12 shallot clones were moderately resistant to A lternaria porii .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–789 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallot genotypes formed two genetic clusters containing 13 and 8 genotypes.

Outcome
clustered into two main groupse0
Value
13 and 8 genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shallot genotypes were clustered into two main groups, Clustered I and II which consisted of 13 and 8 genotypes, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–948 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The closest genetic relatedness was between 8NC and 8NA at 0.85.

Material
8NC and 8NAe0
Outcome
closest genetic relatednesse0
Value
0.85e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The closest genetic relatedness was observed between 8NC and 8NA (0.85)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1020 · show in text ↑
e1

“shallot genotypes were clustered into two main groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–875 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The farthest genetic relatedness was between 11NA and Kramat2 at 0.51.

Material
11NA and Kramat2e0
Outcome
farthest onese0
Value
0.51e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the farthest ones was between 11NA and Kramat2 (0.51)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1081 · show in text ↑
e1

“shallot genotypes were clustered into two main groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–875 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend crossing 11NA and Kramat2 to improve shallot yield potential.

Material
11NA and Kramat2e0
Outcome
cross combination between 11NA and Kramat2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cross combination between 11NA and Kramat2 is valuable and suitable for breeding programs aimed at improving shallot potential yield in the future.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1255 · show in text ↑