Paper · 2019 · Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo

Sugarcane Root Development and Yield under Different Soil Tillage Practices

Emmerson Rodrigues de Moraes; José Geraldo Mageste; Regina Maria Quintão Lana; et al.

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

New strategies for sugarcane production have been very important since the incorporation of ethanol in the Brazilian energy mix in the early 1970s. Prior to planting sugarcane, the soil is prepared, and this process can affect root development and, consequently, sugarcane production. This study was conducted in an area of sugarcane crop renewal in the Cerrado biome (Brazilian tropical savanna), with the objective of identifying which tillage system generates the better root development and improved yield in sugarcane. The treatments were: 1) weed desiccation + moldboard plowing (0.4 m) + mild spike tooth harrowing (0.15 m); 2) subsoiler (0.3 m) + mild spike tooth harrowing (0.15 m); 3) weed desiccation + no-tillage (furrow opening and fertilizer); 4) weed desiccation + subsoiler (0.4 m); 5) ratoon destruction + subsoiler (0.4 m); 6) ratoon destruction + spike tooth harrowing (0.2 m) + moldboard plowing (0.4 m) + mild spike tooth harrowing (0.15 m). Characteristics of the sugarcane root system, such as the root length density, average distance between roots, and root soil exploration, after the first harvest (1.5 years) were studied. Root length density was greater for the treatments that included plowing (0.4 m) and harrowing (0.15 m) operations. The average distance between roots was low in the no-tillage system. The highest sugarcane yield in the plant crop was achieved by management practices with more extensive soil profile disturbances, like plowing followed by harrowing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length density in sugarcane was greater for treatments that included plowing (0.4 m) and harrowing (0.15 m) operations.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
Roote1
Treatment
plowing (0.4 m) and harrowing (0.15 m) operationse1
Outcome
Root length densitye1
Direction
greatere1
Setting
Cerrado biomee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Root Development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Root length density was greater for the treatments that included plowing (0.4 m) and harrowing (0.15 m) operations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1265 · show in text ↑
e2

“This study was conducted in an area of sugarcane crop renewal in the Cerrado biome (Brazilian tropical savanna)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average distance between sugarcane roots was low in the no-tillage system.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
no-tillage systeme3
Outcome
average distance between rootse3
Direction
lowe3
Setting
Cerrado biomee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Root Development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
e3

“The average distance between roots was low in the no-tillage system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1334 · show in text ↑
e2

“This study was conducted in an area of sugarcane crop renewal in the Cerrado biome (Brazilian tropical savanna)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest sugarcane yield in the plant crop was achieved by management with more extensive soil profile disturbances, like plowing followed by harrowing.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
management practices with more extensive soil profile disturbances, like plowing followed by harrowinge4
Outcome
sugarcane yield in the plant crope4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane Root Development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest sugarcane yield in the plant crop was achieved by management practices with more extensive soil profile disturbances, like plowing followed by harrowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1500 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

tillage · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 35 positive, 13 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.