Abstract
The demontration was carried out during Kharif 2016 in three villages of Tumkur district where 25 demonstrations on Pigeonpea crop were carried out in an area of 10 ha by the active participation of farmers with the objective to demonstrate the improved technologies in pigeonpea to exploit production potential. The improved technologies consisted of use of improved wilt resistant variety, seed treatment with Rhizobium culture, soil application Trichoderma and phosphate solubilising bacteria, balanced fertilizer application and integrated pest management. Frontline demonstrations (FLDs) recorded higher yield as compared to farmers' local practice. The improved technology recorded higher yield of 10.5 q/ha compared to 8.25 q/ha in farmers' local practice. In spite of increase in yield, technological gap, extension gap existed. The improved technology gave higher gross return, net return with higher benefit/cost ratio than farmers' practices.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
The improved technology package gave a higher pigeonpea yield of 10.5 q/ha compared with 8.25 q/ha under farmers local practice.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- The improved technologye0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 10.5 q/hae0
- Qualifier
- 8.25 q/hae0
- Comparator
- farmers' local practicee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The improved technology recorded higher yield of 10.5 q/ha compared to 8.25 q/ha in farmers' local practice”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
A technological gap and an extension gap existed in the pigeonpea demonstrations.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Outcome
- technological gap, extension gap existede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“technological gap, extension gap existed”
t0“pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The improved technology gave higher gross return, net return and benefit/cost ratio than farmers practices.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- improved technologye0
- Outcome
- gross return, net return with higher benefit/cost ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- farmers' practicese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The improved technology gave higher gross return, net return with higher benefit/cost ratio than farmers' practices”
t0“pigeonpea”