Paper · 2018 · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)

Nutrient and dose dependent microbiome-mediated protection against a plant pathogen. Berg & Koskella

Berg, Maureen

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Plant-associated microbial communities can promote plant nutrient uptake, growth, and resistance to pathogens. Host resistance to infection can increase directly through commensal-pathogen interactions or indirectly through priming of host defenses, and the specific mechanisms are currently best described for rhizosphere bacteria. For example, Arabidopsis plants infected with the foliar pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato (Pst), increase their root secretion of malate, which attracts Bacillus subtillis to the roots and leads to a stronger host immune response against Pst. While there are numerous examples of individual defensive symbionts, it is less clear whether this type of protection can be an emergent property of whole microbial communities. In particular, relatively little is known about if and how the presence of phyllosphere (above ground) microbial communities can increase host resistance against pathogens. In this study, we examined the ability of augmented tomato phyllosphere microbiomes to confer resistance against the causal agent of bacterial speck, Pst. Across 5 independent experiments, the phyllosphere microbiome was found to decrease pathogen colonization. Furthermore, the dose of commensal bacteria applied affected the degree of protection conferred, and although the effect is dependent on microbial composition, it is not clearly related to overall diversity. Finally, our results suggest that microbial resource community dynamics play an important role in protection, as the addition of fertilizer abolished the observed microbiome-mediated protection. Together, these results have clear relevance to microbiome-mediated protection within agricultural settings, and the use of plant probiotics to increase disease resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Augmented tomato phyllosphere microbiomes decreased colonization by the bacterial speck pathogen Pst across 5 independent experiments.

Treatment
augmented tomato phyllosphere microbiomese1
Interactor
Pste2pathogen
Outcome
pathogen colonizatione0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
Across 5 independent experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across 5 independent experiments, the phyllosphere microbiome was found to decrease pathogen colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1201 · show in text ↑
e1

“augmented tomato phyllosphere microbiomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1024 · show in text ↑
e2

“the causal agent of bacterial speck, Pst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1094 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dose of commensal bacteria applied affected the degree of protection against Pst.

Treatment
dose of commensal bacteriae3
Interactor
Pste2pathogen
Outcome
degree of protectione3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“augmented tomato phyllosphere microbiomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1024 · show in text ↑
e2

“the causal agent of bacterial speck, Pst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1094 · show in text ↑
e3

“the dose of commensal bacteria applied affected the degree of protection conferred”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1298 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The protective effect of the phyllosphere microbiome depends on microbial composition.

Treatment
microbial compositione3
Interactor
Pste2pathogen
Outcome
protectione3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“augmented tomato phyllosphere microbiomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1024 · show in text ↑
e2

“the causal agent of bacterial speck, Pst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1094 · show in text ↑
e3

“protection conferred, and although the effect is dependent on microbial composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1361 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The protective effect is not clearly related to overall microbial diversity.

Treatment
overall diversitye3
Interactor
Pste2pathogen
Outcome
protectione3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“augmented tomato phyllosphere microbiomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1024 · show in text ↑
e2

“the causal agent of bacterial speck, Pst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1094 · show in text ↑
e3

“protection conferred, and although the effect is dependent on microbial composition, it is not clearly related to overall diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1409 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Addition of fertilizer abolished the observed microbiome-mediated protection.

Treatment
addition of fertilizere3
Interactor
Pste2pathogen
Outcome
microbiome-mediated protectione3
Direction
abolishede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“augmented tomato phyllosphere microbiomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1024 · show in text ↑
e2

“the causal agent of bacterial speck, Pst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1094 · show in text ↑
e3

“the addition of fertilizer abolished the observed microbiome-mediated protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1604 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest microbial resource community dynamics play an important role in protection.

Interactor
Pste2pathogen
Outcome
protectione3
Qualifier
microbial resource community dynamicse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“augmented tomato phyllosphere microbiomes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1024 · show in text ↑
e2

“the causal agent of bacterial speck, Pst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1094 · show in text ↑
e3

“microbial resource community dynamics play an important role in protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedcited backgroundmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arabidopsis plants infected with the foliar pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato increase root secretion of malate.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsise4
Treatment
infected with the foliar pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato (Pst)e4
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomatoPseudomonas syringaee4pathogen
Outcome
root secretion of malatee4
Direction
increasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas syringae
Pseudomonas syringae · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Arabidopsis plants infected with the foliar pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato (Pst), increase their root secretion of malate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–483 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedcited backgroundpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malate secreted by infected Arabidopsis attracts Bacillus subtilis to the roots and leads to a stronger host immune response against Pst.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsise4
Interactor
Pste5pathogen
Second interactor
Bacillus subtillise5biocontrol_agent
Compound
malatee4
Outcome
stronger host immune responsee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Arabidopsis plants infected with the foliar pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato (Pst), increase their root secretion of malate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–483 · show in text ↑
e5

“which attracts Bacillus subtillis to the roots and leads to a stronger host immune response against Pst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–588 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: biology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.