Paper · 1995 · Weed Science

Dissipation and Water Activation of UCC-C4243

Terry R. Wright; Alex G. Ogg; E. Patrick Fuerst

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1992 and 1993 to determine the timing and amount of rainfall required to activate UCC-C4243 applied preemergence. UCC-C4243 at 0, 70, and 140 g ai ha −1 was applied 1, 7, 14, and 21 d before 0.5 or 2 cm of simulated rainfall. Temporary rainshelters protected field plots from natural rainfall during the 21 d dry period. Herbicide activity was determined in the field by seeding lentil, wheat, common lambsquarters, and field pennycress and in the greenhouse by a sugarbeet bioassay of soil samples (0 to 3 cm depth) taken from all plots immediately before irrigation. UCC-C4243 did not injure wheat; however, lentil population was reduced when simulated rainfall occurred within 7 d after application. Lentil injury was greater with higher herbicide rate and higher water level. UCC-C4243 at 70 and 140 g ha −1 reduced populations of both weed species by 75 and 90%, respectively, when either 0.5 or 2 cm simulated rainfall was received within 1 d after herbicide application. Weed control was reduced with a 21 d delay between herbicide application and water activation. The sugarbeet bioassay showed a linear decrease of herbicide activity over time and also with accumulated photosynthetically active radiation. After 17.9 d, herbicide activity on a dry soil surface decreased 50%. Laboratory investigations show that [ 14 C]-UCC-C4243 on glass slides was photodegraded by near ultraviolet light (290 to 400 nm). Volatilization of 14 C-labeled herbicide from glass slides was less than 5% after exposure to turbulent air for 48 h.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UCC-C4243 did not injure wheat.

Treatment
UCC-C4243e0
Outcome
injure wheate0
Direction
did note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UCC-C4243 did not injure wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil population fell when rainfall occurred within 7 days of herbicide application.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
simulated rainfall occurred within 7 d after applicatione0
Outcome
lentil populatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lentil population was reduced when simulated rainfall occurred within 7 d after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“UCC-C4243 did not injure wheat; however, lentil population was reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–675 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil injury grew with higher herbicide rate.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
higher herbicide ratee0
Outcome
Lentil injurye0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lentil injury was greater with higher herbicide rate and higher water level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–814 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil injury grew with higher water level.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
higher water levele0
Outcome
Lentil injurye0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lentil injury was greater with higher herbicide rate and higher water level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 70 g ha −1, UCC-C4243 reduced weed populations by 75% after prompt rainfall.

Taxon
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume1
Treatment
UCC-C4243 at 70 and 140 g ha −1e0
Interactor
field pennycressThlaspi arvensee1weed
Outcome
populations of both weed speciese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
75e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thlaspi arvense
Thlaspi arvense · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UCC-C4243 at 70 and 140 g ha −1 reduced populations of both weed species by 75 and 90%, respectively, when either 0.5 or 2 cm simulated rainfall was received within 1 d after herbicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1012 · show in text ↑
e1

“common lambsquarters, and field pennycress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 140 g ha −1, UCC-C4243 reduced weed populations by 90% after prompt rainfall.

Taxon
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume1
Treatment
UCC-C4243 at 70 and 140 g ha −1e0
Interactor
field pennycressThlaspi arvensee1weed
Outcome
populations of both weed speciese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · TaxonOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thlaspi arvense
Thlaspi arvense · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UCC-C4243 at 70 and 140 g ha −1 reduced populations of both weed species by 75 and 90%, respectively, when either 0.5 or 2 cm simulated rainfall was received within 1 d after herbicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–1012 · show in text ↑
e1

“common lambsquarters, and field pennycress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying water activation 21 days reduced weed control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
21 d delay between herbicide application and water activatione0
Outcome
Weed controle0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control was reduced with a 21 d delay between herbicide application and water activation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1107 · show in text ↑
e1

“seeding lentil, wheat, common lambsquarters, and field pennycress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–472 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sugarbeet bioassay showed herbicide activity decreasing over time.

Outcome
herbicide activitye0
Direction
linear decreasee0
Comparator
over timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sugarbeet bioassay showed a linear decrease of herbicide activity over time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“a sugarbeet bioassay of soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–534 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sugarbeet bioassay showed herbicide activity decreasing with accumulated photosynthetically active radiation.

Outcome
herbicide activitye0
Direction
linear decreasee0
Comparator
accumulated photosynthetically active radiatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sugarbeet bioassay showed a linear decrease of herbicide activity over time and also with accumulated photosynthetically active radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1250 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide activity on dry soil decreased 50% after 17.9 days.

Outcome
herbicide activity on a dry soil surfacee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
After 17.9 de0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 17.9 d, herbicide activity on a dry soil surface decreased 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1320 · show in text ↑
e1

“a sugarbeet bioassay of soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–534 · show in text ↑

herbicide · weed · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.