Abstract
Spring-applied herbicides were evaluated in the field in 1982 through 1984 in western Nebraska for selective weed control in irrigated seedling alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L. ‘Appollo’). Weed densities were least in plots treated preplant with benefin [ N -butyl- N -ethyl-2,6-dinitro-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenamine] in combination with postemergence applications of 2,4-DB [4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) butyric acid]. Combinations of sethoxydim {2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one} with bromoxynil (3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile) and fluazifop-butyl {(±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl] oxy] phenoxy] propanoic acid} with bromoxynil provided less grass control than sethoxydim or fluazifop-butyl applied alone. Annual weeds did not reduce alfalfa stand density.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Preplant benefin plus postemergence 2,4-DB gave the lowest weed densities.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae1 - Treatment
- preplant with benefine0
- Interactor
- Weede0weed
- Outcome
- Weed densitiese0
- Direction
- leaste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Weed densities were least in plots treated preplant with benefin [ N -butyl- N -ethyl-2,6-dinitro-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenamine] in combination with postemergence applications of 2,4-DB [4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) butyric acid].”
e1“irrigated seedling alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Sethoxydim with bromoxynil controlled grass less than sethoxydim alone.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae1
- Treatment
- sethoxydime0
- Interactor
- grasse0weed
- Outcome
- grass controle0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- sethoxydim or fluazifop-butyl applied alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Combinations of sethoxydim {2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one} with bromoxynil (3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile) and fluazifop-butyl {(±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl] oxy] phenoxy] propanoic acid} with bromoxynil provided less grass control than sethoxydim or fluazifop-butyl applied alone.”
e1“irrigated seedling alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Fluazifop-butyl with bromoxynil controlled grass less than fluazifop-butyl alone.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae1
- Treatment
- fluazifop-butyle0
- Interactor
- grasse0weed
- Outcome
- grass controle0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- sethoxydim or fluazifop-butyl applied alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Combinations of sethoxydim {2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl]-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one} with bromoxynil (3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile) and fluazifop-butyl {(±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl] oxy] phenoxy] propanoic acid} with bromoxynil provided less grass control than sethoxydim or fluazifop-butyl applied alone.”
e1“irrigated seedling alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Annual weeds did not reduce alfalfa stand density.
- Taxon
- alfalfaMedicago sativae0
- Interactor
- Annual weedse0weed
- Outcome
- alfalfa stand densitye0
- Direction
- did not reducee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Annual weeds did not reduce alfalfa stand density.”
The same questions in other papers
Sethoxydim · control · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.