Abstract
Sericea lespedeza ( Lespedeza cuneata (Dumont) G. Don, var. Serala) was planted in three field experiments at three seeding rates with four rates of S -propyl dipropylthiocarbamate (vernolate). Grass and broadleaf weed populations were reduced, but sericea was unaffected by vernolate incorporated preplant. Use of a herbicide permitted a reduction in seeding rate with no decrease in sericea stand or forage yield. This treatment permitted harvesting a cutting of hay the establishment year with only a minor effect on production the next year. The beneficial effect of vernolate on sericea yield continued the second year, mainly because sericea plants were better established and more vigorous. Sericea seeding rate did not affect weed competition or forage yield. A seeding rate of 11 kg/ha with 3.4 kg/ha vernolate was the most practical treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Preplant vernolate reduced grass and broadleaf weed populations in sericea lespedeza.
- Taxon
- Sericea lespedeza
Lespedeza cuneatat0 - Treatment
- vernolate incorporated preplante2
- Interactor
- Grass and broadleaf weede2weed
- Outcome
- Grass and broadleaf weed populationse2
- Direction
- reducede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Establishment of Sericea Lespedeza”
e1“Sericea lespedeza ( Lespedeza cuneata (Dumont) G. Don, var. Serala) was planted in three field experiments at three seeding rates with four rates of S -propyl dipropylthiocarbamate (vernolate)”
e2“Grass and broadleaf weed populations were reduced, but sericea was unaffected by vernolate incorporated preplant”
Claim · model-written summary
Sericea was unaffected by preplant vernolate.
- Taxon
- Sericea lespedezaLespedeza cuneatat0
- Treatment
- vernolate incorporated preplante2
- Outcome
- sericeae2
- Direction
- unaffectede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Establishment of Sericea Lespedeza”
e2“Grass and broadleaf weed populations were reduced, but sericea was unaffected by vernolate incorporated preplant”
Claim · model-written summary
Use of a herbicide allowed a lower seeding rate with no decrease in sericea stand or forage yield.
- Taxon
- Sericea lespedezaLespedeza cuneatat0
- Treatment
- Use of a herbicidee3
- Outcome
- sericea stand or forage yielde3
- Direction
- no decreasee3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Establishment of Sericea Lespedeza”
e3“Use of a herbicide permitted a reduction in seeding rate with no decrease in sericea stand or forage yield”
Claim · model-written summary
The herbicide treatment allowed a hay cutting in the establishment year with only a minor effect on next-year production.
- Taxon
- Sericea lespedezaLespedeza cuneatat0
- Treatment
- This treatmente4
- Outcome
- production the next yeare4
- Direction
- minor effecte4
- Qualifier
- harvesting a cutting of hay the establishment yeare4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Establishment of Sericea Lespedeza”
e4“This treatment permitted harvesting a cutting of hay the establishment year with only a minor effect on production the next year”
Claim · model-written summary
The beneficial effect of vernolate on sericea yield continued into the second year.
- Taxon
- Sericea lespedezaLespedeza cuneatat0
- Treatment
- vernolatee5
- Outcome
- sericea yielde5
- Direction
- beneficial effecte5
- Qualifier
- the second yeare5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Establishment of Sericea Lespedeza”
e5“The beneficial effect of vernolate on sericea yield continued the second year”
Claim · model-written summary
Sericea seeding rate did not affect weed competition or forage yield.
- Taxon
- Sericea lespedezaLespedeza cuneatat0
- Treatment
- Sericea seeding ratee6
- Outcome
- weed competition or forage yielde6
- Direction
- did not affecte6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Establishment of Sericea Lespedeza”
e6“Sericea seeding rate did not affect weed competition or forage yield”
Claim · model-written summary
A seeding rate of 11 kg/ha with 3.4 kg/ha vernolate is the most practical treatment.
- Taxon
- Sericea lespedezaLespedeza cuneatat0
- Treatment
- seeding rate of 11 kg/ha with 3.4 kg/ha vernolatee7
- Outcome
- the most practical treatmente7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Establishment of Sericea Lespedeza”
e7“A seeding rate of 11 kg/ha with 3.4 kg/ha vernolate was the most practical treatment”