Paper · 1977 · Weed Science

Differential Activity of Three Diphenyl Ether Herbicides

Omosuyi Fadayomi; G.F. Warren

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The tolerance of four legume species to nitrofen (2,4-dichloro-phenyl- p -nitrophenyl ether), fluorodifen ( p -nitrophenyl α,α,α -trifluoro-2-nitro- p -tolyl ether), and oxyfluorofen [2-chloro-1-(3-ethoxy-4-nitro-phenoxy)-4-(trifluoro-methyl)benzene] was investigated both pre- and postemergence in the greenhouse. Seedlings of species that emerged most rapidly seemed to be most tolerant to preemergence herbicide applications. There was no direct relationship between preemergence and postemergence tolerance. Oxyfluorfen was found to be at least 10 times as active as the other two herbicides both pre- and postemergence. Field experiments were conducted at two locations in Indiana to test the effect of method of application on the activity and selectivity of fluorodifen and oxyfluorfen on soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Wayne’] and greenbean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L. ‘Spartan Arrow’). Crop injury and grass weed control were reduced by incorporation of the herbicides 8 cm deep in a silt loam. Method of application did not affect the activity of the herbicides on a sandy soil low in organic matter. Soybean was more tolerant than greenbean to both herbicides when applied preemergence but oxyfluorfen was far more active than fluorodifen on both crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxyfluorfen was at least 10 times as active as the other two herbicides pre- and postemergence in legumes

Taxon
legume speciese1
Treatment
Oxyfluorfene4
Outcome
at least 10 times as activee4
Direction
at least 10 times as activee4
Value
at least 10 timese4
Comparator
the other two herbicidese4

Verbatim

e1

“The tolerance of four legume species to nitrofen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e4

“Oxyfluorfen was found to be at least 10 times as active as the other two herbicides both pre- and postemergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–623 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume seedlings that emerged most rapidly were most tolerant to preemergence herbicide applications

Taxon
legume speciese1
Organ / stage
Seedlingse2
Outcome
most tolerant to preemergence herbicide applicationse2
Direction
most tolerante2

Verbatim

e1

“The tolerance of four legume species to nitrofen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e2

“Seedlings of species that emerged most rapidly seemed to be most tolerant to preemergence herbicide applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–427 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was no direct relationship between preemergence and postemergence herbicide tolerance in legumes

Taxon
legume speciese1
Outcome
preemergence and postemergence tolerancee3
Qualifier
no direct relationshipe3
Setting
greenhousee4

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“The tolerance of four legume species to nitrofen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e3

“There was no direct relationship between preemergence and postemergence tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–510 · show in text ↑
e4

“was investigated both pre- and postemergence in the greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporating the herbicides 8 cm deep reduced soybean crop injury and grass weed control in a silt loam

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe2
Treatment
incorporation of the herbicides 8 cm deepe5
Outcome
Crop injury and grass weed controle5
Direction
reducede5
Setting
silt loame5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Crop injury and grass weed control were reduced by incorporation of the herbicides 8 cm deep in a silt loam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1001 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted at two locations in Indiana to test the effect of method of application on the activity and selectivity of fluorodifen and oxyfluorfen on soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Method of application did not affect herbicide activity on a sandy soil low in organic matter

Taxon
legume speciese1
Treatment
Method of applicatione6
Outcome
activity of the herbicidese6
Direction
did not affecte6
Setting
sandy soil low in organic mattere6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The tolerance of four legume species to nitrofen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
e6

“Method of application did not affect the activity of the herbicides on a sandy soil low in organic matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean was more tolerant than greenbean to both herbicides applied preemergence

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe7
Treatment
both herbicidese7
Outcome
tolerante7
Direction
more tolerante7
Comparator
greenbeane7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Soybean was more tolerant than greenbean to both herbicides when applied preemergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1195 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted at two locations in Indiana to test the effect of method of application on the activity and selectivity of fluorodifen and oxyfluorfen on soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxyfluorfen was far more active than fluorodifen on soybean and greenbean

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe2
Treatment
oxyfluorfene3
Outcome
far more activee3
Direction
far more activee3
Comparator
fluorodifene3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“oxyfluorfen was far more active than fluorodifen on both crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1262 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiments were conducted at two locations in Indiana to test the effect of method of application on the activity and selectivity of fluorodifen and oxyfluorfen on soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–803 · show in text ↑

herbicide · crop injury · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

72 papers: 24 positive, 48 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

herbicide · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 6 positive, 11 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.