Abstract
The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of the thiophene-derived aminophosphonates 1–6 on seedling emergence and growth of monocotyledonous oat (Avena sativa) and dicotyledonous radish (Raphanus sativus L.), and phytotoxicity against three persistent and resistant weeds (Galinsoga parviflora Cav., Rumex acetosa L., and Chenopodium album). Aminophosphonates 1–6 have never been described in the literature. The phytotoxicity of tested aminophosphonates toward their potential application as soil-applied herbicides was evaluated according to the OECD (Organization for Economic and Cooperation Development Publishing) 208 Guideline. In addition, their ecotoxicological impact on crustaceans Heterocypris incongruens and bacteria Aliivibrio fischeri was measured using the OSTRACODTOXKITTM and Microtox® tests. Obtained results showed that none of the tested compounds were found sufficiently phytotoxic and none of them have any herbicidal potential. None of the tested compounds showed important toxicity against Aliivibrio fischeri but they should be considered as slightly harmful. Harmful impacts of compounds 1–6 on Heterocypris incongruens were found to be significant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
None of the aminophosphonates 1-6 were sufficiently phytotoxic to the tested weeds and none has herbicidal potential.
- Taxon
- Galinsoga parviflora Cav., Rumex acetosa L., and Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album
Rumex acetosa.jpg?width=60)
Galinsoga parviflorae2 - Treatment
- thiophene-derived aminophosphonates 1–6e0
- Outcome
- phytotoxice1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The aim of this work was to evaluate the impact of the thiophene-derived aminophosphonates 1–6 on seedling emergence”
e1“none of the tested compounds were found sufficiently phytotoxic and none of them have any herbicidal potential”
e2“phytotoxicity against three persistent and resistant weeds (Galinsoga parviflora Cav., Rumex acetosa L., and Chenopodium album)”
Claim · model-written summary
Compounds 1-6 had significant harmful impacts on the crustacean Heterocypris incongruens.
- Taxon
- Heterocypris incongruens
.jpg?width=60)
Heterocypris incongruense3 - Treatment
- compounds 1–6e3
- Outcome
- Harmful impactse3
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e3“Harmful impacts of compounds 1–6 on Heterocypris incongruens were found to be significant”
Claim · model-written summary
None of the compounds showed important toxicity to the bacterium Aliivibrio fischeri, though they should be considered slightly harmful.
- Taxon
- Aliivibrio fischeri
Aliivibrio fischerie4 - Treatment
- tested compoundse4
- Outcome
- toxicitye4
- Qualifier
- slightly harmfule4
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“None of the tested compounds showed important toxicity against Aliivibrio fischeri but they should be considered as slightly harmful”