Abstract
A field study was conducted during 2015 and 2016 to evaluate the response of the nutrient sources and sowing dates on dry matter accumulation pattern of the Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). The treatments consisted three sowing dates (November 17, November 27 and December 7) and eight nutrient sources (Control, 100% RDF, 100% RDF + Azotobactor, 100% RDF + PSB, 100% RDF + Azotobactor + PSB, 75% RDF + 25 % N through Pressmud+ Azotobactor, 75% RDF + 25 % N through PM + PSB, 75% RDF + 25 % N through PM + Azotobactor + PSB). Results revealed that interaction effect of sowing dates and nutrient sources was observed significant on dry matter accumulation. The application 75% RDF and 25% N through pressmud + Azotobactor + PSB on November 17 highest dry matter was recorded at 45 DAS (14.1, 13.4 and 13.8 g plant-1), 90 DAS (49.2, 45.3 and 47.3 g plant-1) and at harvest (53.9, 48.9 and 51.4 g plant-1), during both the years and in pooled analysis, respectively. Moreover, higher dry matter accumulation was observed at the time of harvesting (59.7, 62.5, 61.1 per cent) on 17 November sowing with the application of 75% RDF and 25% N through pressmud + Azotobactor + PSB over control of all three sowing dates during both the years, respectively. The present study highlighted the practical importance of the sowing dates and nutrient sources combination effect on dry matter accumulation of Indian mustard.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
The interaction of sowing date and nutrient source had a significant effect on dry matter accumulation of Indian mustard.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat0 - Treatment
- sowing dates and nutrient sourcese0
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulatione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”
e0“interaction effect of sowing dates and nutrient sources was observed significant on dry matter accumulation”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest dry matter (14.1, 13.4 and 13.8 g plant-1) was recorded with 75% RDF and 25% N through pressmud plus Azotobacter and PSB on November 17, at 45 DAS.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- 75% RDF and 25% N through pressmud + Azotobactor + PSB on November 17e0
- Interactor
- Azotobactore0other
- Second interactor
- PSBe0other
- Outcome
- dry mattere0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 14.1, 13.4 and 13.8 g plant-1e1
- Qualifier
- 45 DASe1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”
e0“The application 75% RDF and 25% N through pressmud + Azotobactor + PSB on November 17 highest dry matter was recorded”
e1“at 45 DAS (14.1, 13.4 and 13.8 g plant-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest dry matter (49.2, 45.3 and 47.3 g plant-1) was recorded with 75% RDF and 25% N through pressmud plus Azotobacter and PSB on November 17, at 90 DAS.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- 75% RDF and 25% N through pressmud + Azotobactor + PSB on November 17e0
- Interactor
- Azotobactore0other
- Second interactor
- PSBe0other
- Outcome
- dry mattere0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 49.2, 45.3 and 47.3 g plant-1e1
- Qualifier
- 90 DASe1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”
e0“The application 75% RDF and 25% N through pressmud + Azotobactor + PSB on November 17 highest dry matter was recorded”
e1“90 DAS (49.2, 45.3 and 47.3 g plant-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest dry matter (53.9, 48.9 and 51.4 g plant-1) was recorded with 75% RDF and 25% N through pressmud plus Azotobacter and PSB on November 17, at harvest.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- 75% RDF and 25% N through pressmud + Azotobactor + PSB on November 17e0
- Interactor
- Azotobactore0other
- Second interactor
- PSBe0other
- Outcome
- dry mattere0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 53.9, 48.9 and 51.4 g plant-1e1
- Qualifier
- harveste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”
e0“The application 75% RDF and 25% N through pressmud + Azotobactor + PSB on November 17 highest dry matter was recorded”
e1“at harvest (53.9, 48.9 and 51.4 g plant-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Dry matter accumulation at harvest was higher (59.7, 62.5 and 61.1 per cent) with 17 November sowing and 75% RDF plus 25% N through pressmud + Azotobactor + PSB than in the control.
- Taxon
- Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
- Treatment
- 17 November sowing with the application of 75% RDF and 25% N through pressmud + Azotobactor + PSBe0
- Interactor
- Azotobactore0other
- Second interactor
- PSBe0other
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulatione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 59.7, 62.5, 61.1 per cente0
- Comparator
- control of all three sowing datese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.)”
e0“higher dry matter accumulation was observed at the time of harvesting (59.7, 62.5, 61.1 per cent) on 17 November sowing with the application of 75% RDF and 25% N through pressmud + Azotobactor + PSB over control of all three sowing dates”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results
65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →fertilization · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results
137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
135 papers more in this group
See all 139 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.