Paper · 2017 · Journal of Plant Production

Impact of Plant Arrangement and Density on Yield and its Components of Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.).

Dalia El Hag

18
claims
35
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In order to study the effect of plant arrangement (2 plants hill-1 on one side and plant hill-1 on two side of ridge) and hill spacing (15, 30 and 45 cm between hills) on seed yield and its components of two faba bean cultivars (Sakha 1 and Giza 843), an experiment was conducted in two growing seasons 2013/14 and 2014/15 winter seasons, in the farm of the Faculty of Agriculture, kafrelshiekh university, kafre-Elshiekh Governorate, Egypt. A split-split plot with four replications was used. The main plots were assigned to cultivars, the sub plots to plant arrangements and the sub-sub plots to hill spacing. The data collected were: plant height, number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod, 100 seed weight, seed yield and harvest index. Results indicated that, the cultivar Sakha 1 was superior to Giza 843 on plant height, number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant, Seeds/pod, seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight, seed yield and harvest index % .Plants arranged on one side of ridge recorded taller height and higher harvest index than those arranged on two sides of ridges. The inverse was true in the other characters. The increases in plant density by narrowing the distance between hills resulted in significant decrease in number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod, seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield. However, plant height was increased by increasing plant density. Seed yield was significantly increased by increasing hill space from 15 to 30 cm. It can be concluded that sowing the faba bean cultivar ''Sakha 1'' on two sides of ridges 60 cm apart at 30 cm space between hills is the recommended treatment for optimum seed yield in Kafre El-Sheikh area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 1 was superior to Giza 843 in plant height.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Material
Sakha 1e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Giza 843e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cultivar Sakha 1 was superior to Giza 843 on plant height, number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant, Seeds/pod, seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight, seed yield and harvest index %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 1 was superior to Giza 843 in number of branches/plant.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Material
Sakha 1e0
Outcome
number of branches/plante0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Giza 843e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cultivar Sakha 1 was superior to Giza 843 on plant height, number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant, Seeds/pod, seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight, seed yield and harvest index %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 1 was superior to Giza 843 in number of pods/plant.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Material
Sakha 1e0
Outcome
number of pods/plante0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Giza 843e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cultivar Sakha 1 was superior to Giza 843 on plant height, number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant, Seeds/pod, seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight, seed yield and harvest index %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 1 was superior to Giza 843 in Seeds/pod.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Material
Sakha 1e0
Outcome
Seeds/pode0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Giza 843e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cultivar Sakha 1 was superior to Giza 843 on plant height, number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant, Seeds/pod, seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight, seed yield and harvest index %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 1 was superior to Giza 843 in seed weight/plant.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Material
Sakha 1e0
Outcome
seed weight/plante0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Giza 843e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cultivar Sakha 1 was superior to Giza 843 on plant height, number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant, Seeds/pod, seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight, seed yield and harvest index %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 1 was superior to Giza 843 in 100-seed weight.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Material
Sakha 1e0
Outcome
100-seed weighte0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Giza 843e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cultivar Sakha 1 was superior to Giza 843 on plant height, number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant, Seeds/pod, seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight, seed yield and harvest index %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 1 was superior to Giza 843 in seed yield.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Material
Sakha 1e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Giza 843e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cultivar Sakha 1 was superior to Giza 843 on plant height, number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant, Seeds/pod, seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight, seed yield and harvest index %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 1 was superior to Giza 843 in harvest index %.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Material
Sakha 1e0
Outcome
harvest index %e0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Giza 843e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cultivar Sakha 1 was superior to Giza 843 on plant height, number of branches/plant, number of pods/plant, Seeds/pod, seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight, seed yield and harvest index %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One-sided ridge planting produced taller plants than two-sided planting.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Treatment
one side of ridgee0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
tallere0
Comparator
two sides of ridgese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants arranged on one side of ridge recorded taller height and higher harvest index than those arranged on two sides of ridges. The inverse was true in the other characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One-sided planting had higher harvest index.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Treatment
one side of ridgee0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
two sides of ridgese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants arranged on one side of ridge recorded taller height and higher harvest index than those arranged on two sides of ridges. The inverse was true in the other characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing plant density decreased number of pods/plant.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Treatment
increases in plant density by narrowing the distance between hillse0
Outcome
number of pods/plante0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increases in plant density by narrowing the distance between hills resulted in significant decrease in number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod, seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing plant density decreased number of seeds/pod.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Treatment
increases in plant density by narrowing the distance between hillse0
Outcome
number of seeds/pode0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increases in plant density by narrowing the distance between hills resulted in significant decrease in number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod, seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing plant density decreased seed weight/plant.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Treatment
increases in plant density by narrowing the distance between hillse0
Outcome
seed weight/plante0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increases in plant density by narrowing the distance between hills resulted in significant decrease in number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod, seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing plant density decreased 100-seed weight.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Treatment
increases in plant density by narrowing the distance between hillse0
Outcome
100-seed weighte0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increases in plant density by narrowing the distance between hills resulted in significant decrease in number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod, seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing plant density decreased seed yield.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Treatment
increases in plant density by narrowing the distance between hillse0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increases in plant density by narrowing the distance between hills resulted in significant decrease in number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod, seed weight/plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing plant density increased plant height.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Treatment
increasing plant densitye0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, plant height was increased by increasing plant density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing hill space from 15 to 30 cm increased seed yield.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Treatment
increasing hill space from 15 to 30 cme0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed yield was significantly increased by increasing hill space from 15 to 30 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Two Faba Bean Cultivars (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Sakha 1 on both sides of 60 cm ridges at 30 cm between hills for optimum seed yield in Kafre El-Sheikh.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Material
Sakha 1e0
Outcome
recommended treatment for optimum seed yielde0
Setting
Kafre El-Sheikh areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sowing the faba bean cultivar ''Sakha 1'' on two sides of ridges 60 cm apart at 30 cm space between hills is the recommended treatment for optimum seed yield in Kafre El-Sheikh area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1710 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

density · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 41 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.