Paper · 2015 · African Journal of Plant Science

Planting date and cultivar effects on growth and yield performance of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)

E Ezeaku I; N Mbah B; P Baiyeri K

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
18
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Genotype by environment interaction results in significant differences in the performance of cultivars when tested in diverse environments. Nine improved cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) cultivars obtained from International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria and a local check were evaluated for growth, reproductive and grain yield components in a non-traditional cowpea growing region of south eastern Nigeria with the aim of identifying high yielding genotypes and optimum planting date. The study was conducted in two locations namely Mgbakwu (06°17ʹN, 07°04ʹE; 83 masl) and Ishiagu (05°58ʹN, 07°34ʹE; 197 masl) across two years and two seasons in each year. A split-plot design was used with three replications. The results indicated that early planting date gave significantly higher yield and yield components than late planting date in both years and locations. IT 98K-131-2 produced mean grain yield of 1220 kg ha-1 in early planting date and 732 kg ha-1 in late season planting in Ishiagu, while in Mgbakwu, it produced 921 and 326 kg ha-1 in early and late planting dates, respectively. IT 97K-556-4 on the other hand produced mean grain yield of 1154 and 424 kg ha-1 in early and late planting dates, respectively in Ishiagu; while in Mgbakwu, the mean grain yield were 1594 and 251 kg ha-1 for early and late planting dates, respectively. IT 98K-131-2 exhibited the highest mean grain yield attributes in all the environments, indicating broad adaptation; while IT 97K-556-4 was the next highest grain yielder with specific adaptation to early season in Mgbakwu. The two cultivars are therefore recommended to farmers for multiplication and general cultivation in south eastern Nigeria. Key words: Cowpea, growth and yield components, planting date.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early planting gave significantly higher cowpea yield and yield components than late planting in both years and locations.

Treatment
early planting datee1
Outcome
yield and yield componentse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
late planting datee1
Setting
in both years and locationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nine improved cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“early planting date gave significantly higher yield and yield components than late planting date in both years and locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–900 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IT 98K-131-2 gave higher mean grain yield in early than in late planting at Ishiagu.

Material
IT 98K-131-2e2
Treatment
early planting datee2
Outcome
mean grain yielde2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
1220 kg ha-1e2
Qualifier
732 kg ha-1e2
Comparator
late season plantinge2
Setting
Ishiague2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nine improved cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–200 · show in text ↑
e2

“IT 98K-131-2 produced mean grain yield of 1220 kg ha-1 in early planting date and 732 kg ha-1 in late season planting in Ishiagu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IT 98K-131-2 gave higher mean grain yield in early than in late planting at Mgbakwu.

Treatment
earlye3
Outcome
producede3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
921 and 326 kg ha-1e3
Comparator
late planting datese3
Setting
Mgbakwue3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nine improved cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–200 · show in text ↑
e3

“while in Mgbakwu, it produced 921 and 326 kg ha-1 in early and late planting dates, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IT 97K-556-4 gave higher mean grain yield in early than in late planting at Ishiagu.

Material
IT 97K-556-4e4
Treatment
earlye4
Outcome
mean grain yielde4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
1154 and 424 kg ha-1e4
Comparator
late planting datese4
Setting
Ishiague4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nine improved cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–200 · show in text ↑
e4

“IT 97K-556-4 on the other hand produced mean grain yield of 1154 and 424 kg ha-1 in early and late planting dates, respectively in Ishiagu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IT 97K-556-4 gave higher mean grain yield in early than in late planting at Mgbakwu.

Treatment
earlye5
Outcome
mean grain yielde5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Value
1594 and 251 kg ha-1e5
Comparator
late planting datese5
Setting
Mgbakwue5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nine improved cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–200 · show in text ↑
e5

“while in Mgbakwu, the mean grain yield were 1594 and 251 kg ha-1 for early and late planting dates, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1382 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IT 98K-131-2 had the highest mean grain yield in all environments, indicating broad adaptation.

Material
IT 98K-131-2e6
Outcome
highest mean grain yield attributese6
Qualifier
indicating broad adaptatione6
Setting
all the environmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nine improved cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–200 · show in text ↑
e6

“IT 98K-131-2 exhibited the highest mean grain yield attributes in all the environments, indicating broad adaptation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1499 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IT 97K-556-4 was the next highest grain yielder, with specific adaptation to early season in Mgbakwu.

Material
IT 97K-556-4e7
Outcome
specific adaptation to early seasone7
Setting
Mgbakwue7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nine improved cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–200 · show in text ↑
e7

“IT 97K-556-4 was the next highest grain yielder with specific adaptation to early season in Mgbakwu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1606 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The two cultivars are recommended to farmers for multiplication and general cultivation in south eastern Nigeria.

Outcome
multiplication and general cultivatione5
Setting
south eastern Nigeriae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nine improved cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–200 · show in text ↑
e5

“The two cultivars are therefore recommended to farmers for multiplication and general cultivation in south eastern Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1730 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 18 positive, 13 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.