Paper · 2018 · 2018 IEEE 4th International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC)

Automatic Classification and Detection of Oranges Based on Computer Vision

Yuwei Chen; Jinghua Wu; Mengtian Cui

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study, an automatic orange grading detection method based on computer vision was proposed. First, the images of orange were collected and preprocessed. Secondly, orange and background are segmented by edge detection and image segmentation. Based on the image segmentation, four main features of orange include fruit surface color, fruit size, fruit surface defect and fruit shape were extracted. These features were studied using BP neural network. Finally, the automatic orange grading detection was performed by using neural network. The experimental results showed that the grading accuracy of this grading method was 94.38% and the classification accuracy of the first grade is 100%. Compared with the artificial method, it has the features of high correct identification rate and good real-time performance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The orange grading method achieved 94.38% accuracy.

Taxon
Orangest0
Outcome
grading accuracye0
Value
94.38%e0

Verbatim

e0

“the grading accuracy of this grading method was 94.38%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–49 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-grade orange classification accuracy was 100%.

Taxon
Orangest0
Outcome
classification accuracy of the first gradee0
Value
100%e0

Verbatim

e0

“the classification accuracy of the first grade is 100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–49 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with manual grading, the method had a high correct identification rate and good real-time performance.

Taxon
Orangest0
Outcome
high correct identification rate and good real-time performancee0
Comparator
the artificial methode0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the artificial method, it has the features of high correct identification rate and good real-time performance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oranges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–49 · show in text ↑