Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

The Effect of Chemical and Non-Chemical Control Methods on Weeds and Yield in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Cultivation under Potato Based Organic Cropping System

Varsha Gupta; Ekta Joshi; Deep Singh; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Potato is one of the most important commercial vegetable crops in India and on an average this crop is affected by weeds damage which should be prevented by various control methods. Cultural operations and mulches are non-chemical methods of weed control in sustainable agricultural systems. The aim of present study was to investigate the effect of chemical and non-chemical control methods on weeds and yield of potato crop. Field experiments were conducted during rabi 2016-17 and 2017-18 at Research Farm College of Agriculture, RVSKVV, Gwalior in a randomized block design (RBD) with three replications. The treatments were as follows: 1) white plastic mulch, 2) black plastic mulch, 3) straw mulching after 5 DAP as 5 t/ha, 4) one hand weeding at 20 DAP + straw mulching at 25 DAP, 5) two hand weeding at 20 & 40 DAP, 6) one hand hoeing at 20 DAP, 7) one hand hoeing at 20 DAP + one hand weeding at 40 DAP, 8) Recommended herbicide (metribuzin 500 g/ha), 9) Recommended herbicide (metribuzin 500 g/ha) + one hand weeding at 40 DAP and 10) Weedy check. Based on results, all treatments were affected by weed control methods. At 60 DAP the highest weeds density was counted as 567.83 plants/m2 of weedy check treatment. The two hand weeding at 20 & 40 DAP deceased weed density 86% as compared to weedy check. The hoeing at 20 DAP with one hand weeding at 40 DAP and straw mulching with one hand weeding were also deceased weeds density around 75% comparing to weedy check. However, at harvest stage weed biomass in the treatments of white and black plastic mulch compared to the weed infested treatment had the highest weeds biomass around 46% in both. The lowest weed biomass was observed in two hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAP by 19.22% after the weedy check. It can be concluded that, the two hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAP and straw mulching with one hand weeding can provide more proper control of weeds compared to the use of herbicides and the use of straw mulches reduces the use of herbicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weedy check had the highest weed density, 567.83 plants/m2 at 60 DAP.

Organ / stage
60 DAPe0
Treatment
weedy check treatmente0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weeds densitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
567.83 plants/m2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 60 DAP the highest weeds density was counted as 567.83 plants/m2 of weedy check treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DAP decreased weed density 86% versus the weedy check.

Treatment
two hand weeding at 20 & 40 DAPe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
deceasede0
Value
86%e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two hand weeding at 20 & 40 DAP deceased weed density 86% as compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1312 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hoeing at 20 DAP plus hand weeding at 40 DAP decreased weed density about 75% versus the weedy check.

Treatment
hoeing at 20 DAP with one hand weeding at 40 DAPe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weeds densitye0
Direction
deceasede0
Value
75%e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hoeing at 20 DAP with one hand weeding at 40 DAP and straw mulching with one hand weeding were also deceased weeds density around 75% comparing to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulching plus one hand weeding decreased weed density about 75% versus the weedy check.

Treatment
straw mulching with one hand weedinge0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weeds densitye0
Direction
deceasede0
Value
75%e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw mulching with one hand weeding were also deceased weeds density around 75% comparing to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1476 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White and black plastic mulch had the highest weed biomass at harvest, about 46% relative to weed-infested treatment.

Treatment
white and black plastic mulche0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weeds biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
46%e0
Comparator
weed infested treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at harvest stage weed biomass in the treatments of white and black plastic mulch compared to the weed infested treatment had the highest weeds biomass around 46% in both”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1656 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings at 20 and 40 DAP had the lowest weed biomass at harvest, 19.22% after the weedy check.

Treatment
two hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAPe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
loweste0
Value
19.22%e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest weed biomass was observed in two hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAP by 19.22% after the weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1763 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that two hand weedings or straw mulching with hand weeding provide better weed control than herbicides.

Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
more proper control of weedse0
Comparator
use of herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the two hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAP and straw mulching with one hand weeding can provide more proper control of weeds compared to the use of herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1791–1944 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that straw mulch reduces herbicide use.

Outcome
reduces the use of herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of straw mulches reduces the use of herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1949–2003 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–107 · show in text ↑

organic · weed · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mulching · weed · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

herbicide · weed · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 40 positive, 3 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.