Paper · 2019 · Planta Daninha

Response of Wheat Plants to Combinations of Herbicides with Insecticides and Fungicides

M. VIECELLI; F.B. PAGNONCELLI JR.; M.M. TREZZI; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The combination of herbicides and other pesticides can influence weed and crop management. This study aimed to evaluate the response of the combination of different herbicides with insecticides or fungicides of different chemical groups on the development and yield of wheat grains of the cultivar ORS Vintecinco. The experimental design was a randomized block design with three replications. The experiment consisted of 33 treatments, as follows: control without application and application of the herbicides 2,4-D (1,005 g a.e. ha-1), bentazon (756 g a.i. ha-1), metsulfuron-methyl (3 g a.i. ha-1), and pyroxsulam (16 g a.i. ha-1), isolated or combined with the insecticides chlorfluazuron (15 g a.i. ha-1), chlorpyrifos (720 g a.i. ha-1), deltamethrin (5 g a.i. ha-1), and methomyl (5 g a.i. ha-1) or with the fungicides azoxystrobin (100 g a.i. ha-1), carbendazim (250 g a.i. ha-1), and propiconazole (190 g a.i. ha-1). Relative tolerance (RT), shoot dry matter (SDM), yield components, and grain yield were evaluated. In general, pyroxsulam had the highest number of synergistic interactions with insecticides and fungicides, reducing RT and SDM, especially the combination pyroxsulam + chlorpyrifos due to a lower RT level (45%) and higher SDM reduction (52%). All combinations of herbicides with the insecticide chlorpyrifos and most of the combinations with the fungicide propiconazole led to a reduction of grain yield when compared to their isolated application or to control without application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxsulam had the highest number of synergistic interactions with insecticides and fungicides.

Treatment
pyroxsulame0
Outcome
number of synergistic interactions with insecticides and fungicidese0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pyroxsulam had the highest number of synergistic interactions with insecticides and fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxsulam combinations reduced wheat relative tolerance.

Treatment
pyroxsulame0
Outcome
RTe0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pyroxsulam had the highest number of synergistic interactions with insecticides and fungicides, reducing RT and SDM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxsulam combinations reduced wheat shoot dry matter.

Treatment
pyroxsulame0
Outcome
SDMe0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pyroxsulam had the highest number of synergistic interactions with insecticides and fungicides, reducing RT and SDM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxsulam plus chlorpyrifos produced a low wheat relative tolerance level of 45%.

Treatment
pyroxsulam + chlorpyrifose0
Outcome
RT levele0
Direction
lowere0
Value
45%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination pyroxsulam + chlorpyrifos due to a lower RT level (45%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxsulam plus chlorpyrifos reduced wheat shoot dry matter by 52%.

Treatment
pyroxsulam + chlorpyrifose0
Outcome
SDMe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
52%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination pyroxsulam + chlorpyrifos due to a lower RT level (45%) and higher SDM reduction (52%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Every chlorpyrifos and herbicide combination reduced wheat grain yield relative to isolated application or untreated control.

Treatment
combinations of herbicides with the insecticide chlorpyrifose0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
their isolated application or to control without applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All combinations of herbicides with the insecticide chlorpyrifos and most of the combinations with the fungicide propiconazole led to a reduction of grain yield when compared to their isolated application or to control without application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1516 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most propiconazole and herbicide combinations reduced wheat grain yield relative to isolated application or untreated control.

Treatment
combinations with the fungicide propiconazolee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
most of the combinationse0
Comparator
their isolated application or to control without applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All combinations of herbicides with the insecticide chlorpyrifos and most of the combinations with the fungicide propiconazole led to a reduction of grain yield when compared to their isolated application or to control without application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1516 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–24 · show in text ↑

chlorpyrifos · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

propiconazole · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

22 papers: 19 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

chlorpyrifos · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

insecticide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

69 papers: 51 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 232 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 466 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.