Paper · 2015

Evaluation of Certain Insecticides against Gram Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) Infesting Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.)

M. Sreekanth; M. S. M. Lakshmi; Y. K. Raghunatha Rao

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted during Kharif, 2010 and 2011 to evaluate the bio-efficacy and economics of certain insecticides against gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on pigeonpea. Experimental results showed that the pod damage due to pod borer, H. armigera was lowest (5.9%) in plots treated with acetamiprid and dimethoate, followed by fipronil (6.6%) and thiamethoxam (7.2%) with 42.2, 42.2, 35.3 and 29.4 per cent reduction over control respectively. The untreated plot has recorded maximum pod damage of 10.2%. Highest grain yield was recorded in fipronil treated plots (4.5 q/ha), followed by thiacloprid (4.2 q/ha) and dimethoate (4.0 q/ha) with 50.0, 40.0 and 33.3 per cent increase in yield over control respectively as against the minimum yield of 3.0 q/ha in the untreated check. However, the ICBR was highest in thiamethoxam (1: 7.8) and dimethoate (1: 6.2), followed by acetamiprid (1: 4.1) and thiacloprid (1:3.4).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid reduced pod borer pod damage to 5.9%, a 42.2 percent reduction over control.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
acetamipride0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
pod damage due to pod borer, H. armigerae0
Direction
reductione0
Value
5.9%e0
Qualifier
42.2e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pod damage due to pod borer, H. armigera was lowest (5.9%) in plots treated with acetamiprid and dimethoate, followed by fipronil (6.6%) and thiamethoxam (7.2%) with 42.2, 42.2, 35.3 and 29.4 per cent reduction over control respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–475 · show in text ↑
e1

“on pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethoate reduced pod borer pod damage to 5.9%, a 42.2 percent reduction over control.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
dimethoatee0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
pod damage due to pod borer, H. armigerae0
Direction
reductione0
Value
5.9%e0
Qualifier
42.2e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pod damage due to pod borer, H. armigera was lowest (5.9%) in plots treated with acetamiprid and dimethoate, followed by fipronil (6.6%) and thiamethoxam (7.2%) with 42.2, 42.2, 35.3 and 29.4 per cent reduction over control respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–475 · show in text ↑
e1

“on pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fipronil reduced pod damage to 6.6%, a 35.3 percent reduction over control.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
fipronile0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
pod damage due to pod borer, H. armigerae0
Direction
reductione0
Value
6.6%e0
Qualifier
35.3e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pod damage due to pod borer, H. armigera was lowest (5.9%) in plots treated with acetamiprid and dimethoate, followed by fipronil (6.6%) and thiamethoxam (7.2%) with 42.2, 42.2, 35.3 and 29.4 per cent reduction over control respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–475 · show in text ↑
e1

“on pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam reduced pod damage to 7.2%, a 29.4 percent reduction over control.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
thiamethoxame0
Interactor
H. armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae0pest
Outcome
pod damage due to pod borer, H. armigerae0
Direction
reductione0
Value
7.2%e0
Qualifier
29.4e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pod damage due to pod borer, H. armigera was lowest (5.9%) in plots treated with acetamiprid and dimethoate, followed by fipronil (6.6%) and thiamethoxam (7.2%) with 42.2, 42.2, 35.3 and 29.4 per cent reduction over control respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–475 · show in text ↑
e1

“on pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–199 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated plots had maximum pod damage of 10.2%.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Interactor
Helicoverpa armigeraHelicoverpa armigerae1pest
Outcome
pod damagee0
Value
10.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera · InteractorRaimundo Pastor · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The untreated plot has recorded maximum pod damage of 10.2%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–536 · show in text ↑
e1

“gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fipronil gave 4.5 q/ha grain yield, 50.0 percent over control.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
fipronile0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
4.5 q/hae0
Qualifier
50.0e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield was recorded in fipronil treated plots (4.5 q/ha), followed by thiacloprid (4.2 q/ha) and dimethoate (4.0 q/ha) with 50.0, 40.0 and 33.3 per cent increase in yield over control respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–746 · show in text ↑
e1

“on pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiacloprid gave 4.2 q/ha grain yield, 40.0 percent over control.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
thiaclopride0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
4.2 q/hae0
Qualifier
40.0e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield was recorded in fipronil treated plots (4.5 q/ha), followed by thiacloprid (4.2 q/ha) and dimethoate (4.0 q/ha) with 50.0, 40.0 and 33.3 per cent increase in yield over control respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–746 · show in text ↑
e1

“on pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–199 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethoate gave 4.0 q/ha grain yield, 33.3 percent over control.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
dimethoatee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
4.0 q/hae0
Qualifier
33.3e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield was recorded in fipronil treated plots (4.5 q/ha), followed by thiacloprid (4.2 q/ha) and dimethoate (4.0 q/ha) with 50.0, 40.0 and 33.3 per cent increase in yield over control respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–746 · show in text ↑
e1

“on pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–199 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated pigeonpea yielded 3.0 q/ha.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Outcome
yielde0
Value
3.0 q/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum yield of 3.0 q/ha in the untreated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–810 · show in text ↑
e1

“on pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–199 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam had the highest ICBR of 1: 7.8.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
thiamethoxame0
Outcome
ICBRe0
Value
1: 7.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ICBR was highest in thiamethoxam (1: 7.8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–866 · show in text ↑
e1

“on pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–199 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethoate had ICBR of 1: 6.2.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane2
Treatment
dimethoatee0
Outcome
ICBRe1
Value
1: 6.2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dimethoate (1: 6.2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–890 · show in text ↑
e1

“the ICBR was highest in thiamethoxam (1: 7.8) and dimethoate (1: 6.2), followed by acetamiprid (1: 4.1) and thiacloprid (1:3.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–948 · show in text ↑
e2

“on pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–199 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetamiprid had ICBR of 1: 4.1.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
acetamipride0
Outcome
ICBRe0
Value
1: 4.1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ICBR was highest in thiamethoxam (1: 7.8) and dimethoate (1: 6.2), followed by acetamiprid (1: 4.1) and thiacloprid (1:3.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–948 · show in text ↑
e1

“on pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–199 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiacloprid had ICBR of 1:3.4.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
thiaclopride0
Outcome
ICBRe0
Value
1:3.4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ICBR was highest in thiamethoxam (1: 7.8) and dimethoate (1: 6.2), followed by acetamiprid (1: 4.1) and thiacloprid (1:3.4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–948 · show in text ↑
e1

“on pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–199 · show in text ↑

acetamiprid · Helicoverpa armigera · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

thiacloprid · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fipronil · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Fipronil 5SC gave the highest net profit.

    Efficacy of biorationals against pod bugs in pigeon pea · 2016 · compared with thiamethoxam 25WG and imidacloprid 17.8SL

    Same direction

  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

dimethoate · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.